Abstract
The results of joint analysis of temperature variations near mesopause from long-term measurements at the Zvenigorod Scientific Station of the Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics RAS in 1960–2015 and variations of surface air temperature characterizing global climate change. Together with variations of temperature at the mesopause T ms from measurements of the hydroxyl emissions we analyzed the temperature variations near mesopause T m reduced to the same level of solar activity. The observed strong decrease in temperature near mesopause during last decades, particularly in winter, with its tendency to slow down since the 1980’s is was detected against the background of general increase in the surface air temperature of the Northern Hemisphere T NHs and the Earth as a whole. It was revealed a sharp drop in winter temperature near mesopause in 1970s. and its synchronicity with the shift in climatic features at the surface associated with changes in formation of El Nino events and their impact on the global climate. The general significant negative correlation of temperature variations near mesopause and T NHs detected from 56-year observational data was not accompanied by any significant coherence between the most long-period temperature variations from the cross-wavelet analysis. To assess the possible manifestation of this coherence the results of numerical simulations with a global climate model were used. According to model simulations for the 20–21 centuries taking into account anthropogenic forcings for significant coherence between long-term variations T m and T NHs the prolonged observations are required for temperature near mesopause–about a century or more.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. G. Roble and R. E. Dickinson, “How will changes in carbon dioxide and methane modify the mean structure of the mesosphere and thermosphere?,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 1441–1444 (1989).
G. S. Golitsyn, A. I. Semenov, N. N. Shefov, et al., “Long-term temperature trends in the middle and upper atmosphere,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 1741–1744 (1996).
I. I. Mokhov and A. V. Eliseev, “Tropospheric and stratospheric temperature annual cycle: Tendencies of change,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 33 (4), 415–426 (1997).
A. I. Semenov, N. N. Shefov, G. V. Givishvili, et al., “Seasonal peculiarities of long-term temperature trends of the middle atmosphere,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 375 (8), 1286–1289 (2000).
A. I. Semenov, N. N. Shefov, E. N. Lysenko, et al., “The season peculiarities of behavior of the long-term temperature trends in the middle atmosphere on the mid-latitudes,” Phys. Chem. Earth 27, 529–534 (2002).
G. Beig, P. Keckhut, R. P. Lowe, et al., “Review of mesospheric temperature trends,” Rev. Geophys. 41 (4), 1015 (2003). doi 10.1029/2002RG000121
N. N. Shefov, A. I. Semenov, and V. Yu. Khomich, Airglow as an Indicator of the Upper Atmospheric Structure and Dynamics (Geos, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis—Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Ed. by S. Solomon, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
L. Qian, J. Laštovicka, R. G. Roble, et al., “Progress in observations and simulations of global change in the upper atmosphere,” J. Geophys. Res. 116, A00H03 (2011). doi 10.1029/2010JA016317
I. I. Mokhov and A. I. Semenov, “Nonlinear temperature changes in the atmospheric mesopause region of the atmosphere against the background of global climate changes, 1960–2012,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 456 (2), 741–744 (2014).
I. I. Mokhov, “Contemporary climate changes in the Arctic,” Herald Russ. Acad. Sci. 85 (3), 265–271 (2015).
G. Beig, “Long-term trends in the temperature of the mesosphere/lower thermosphere region: 1. Anthropogenic influences,” J. Geophys. Res. 116, A00H11 (2011). doi 10.1029/2011JA016646
G. Beig, “Long-term trends in the temperature of the mesosphere/lower thermosphere region: 2. Solar response,” J. Geophys. Res. 116, A00H12 (2011). doi 10.1029/2011JA016766
N. L. Bindoff, P. A. Stott, K. M. AchutaRao, et al., “Detection and attribution of climate change: from global to regional,” in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Ed. by T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013), pp. 867–952.
C.-Y. She, D. A. Krueger, and T. Yuan, “Long-term midlatitude mesopause region temperature trend deduced from quarter century (1990–2014) Na lidar observations,” AnGeo Commun. 33, 363–369 (2015).
E. M. Volodin, V. Ya. Galin, A. V. Gusev, et al., “Earth system model of INM,” Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 25 (5), 531–545 (2010).
V. Ya. Galin, S. P. Smyshlyaev, and E. M. Volodin, “Combined chemistry–climate model of the atmosphere,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 43 (4), 399–412 (2007).
E. M. Volodin and G. Schmitz, “A troposphere–stratosphere–mesosphere general circulation model with parameterization of gravity waves: Climatology and sensitivity studies,” Tellus 53A, 300–316 (2001).
S. Jevrejeva, J. C. Moore, and A. Grinsted, “Influence of the Arctic Oscillation and El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on the conditions in the Baltic Sea: The wavelet approach,” J. Geophys. Res. 108 (D21), 4677 (2003). doi 10.1029/2003JD003417
I. I. Mokhov and V. Ch. Khon, “Interannual variability and long-term tendencies of change in atmospheric centers of action in the Northern Hemisphere: Analyses of observational data,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 41 (6), 657–666 (2005).
K. E. Trenberth and T. J. Hoar, “El Niño and climate change,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 24 (23), 3057–3060 (1997).
Y. Zhang, J. M. Wallace, and D. S. Battisti, “ENSOlike interdecadal variability: 1900–93,” J. Clim. 10 (5), 1004–1020 (1997).
G. A. Meehl, A. Hu, and B. D. Santer, “The mid-1970s climate shift in the Pacific and the relative roles of forced versus inherent decadal variability,” J. Clim. 22, 780–792 (2009).
I. I. Mokhov, A. V. Eliseev, and D. V. Khvorostyanov, “Evolution of the characteristics of interannual climate variability associated with the El Niño and La Niña phenomena,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 36 (6), 681–690 (2000).
I. I. Mokhov, D. V. Khvorostyanov, and A. V. Eliseev, “Decadal and longer term changes in El Nino–Southern Oscillation characteristics,” Int. J. Climatol. 24, 401–414 (2004).
I. I. Mokhov and D. A. Smirnov, “Study of the mutual influence of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation processes and the North Atlantic and Arctic oscillations,” 42 (5), 598–614 (2006).
I. I. Mokhov and D. A. Smirnov, “Diagnostics of a cause–effect relation between solar activity and the Earth’s global surface temperature,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 44 (3), 263–272 (2008).
I. I. Mokhov and D. A. Smirnov, “Empirical estimates of the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on the global surface temperature,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 427 (5), 798–803 (2009).
D. A. Smirnov and I. I. Mokhov, “From Granger causality to "long-term causality”: Application to climatic data," Phys. Rev. E 80, 016208 (2009).
I. I. Mokhov and D. S. Smirnov, “Relation between the variations in the global surface temperature, El Niño/La Niña phenomena, and the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation,” Dokl. Earth Sci., 467 (2), 384–388 (2016).
V. I. Perminov, A. I. Semenov, I. V. Medvedeva, and Yu. A. Zheleznov, “Variability of mesopause temperature from the hydroxyl airglow observations over midlatitudinal sites, Zvenigorod and Tory, Russia,” Adv. Space Res. 54, 2511–2517 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © I.I. Mokhov, A.I. Semenov, E.M. Volodin, M.A. Dembitskaya, 2017, published in Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, Fizika Atmosfery i Okeana, 2017, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 435–444.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mokhov, I.I., Semenov, A.I., Volodin, E.M. et al. Changes of cooling near mesopause under global warming from observations and model simulations. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 53, 383–391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433817040090
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433817040090