Skip to main content
Log in

False learning function of an acoustic signal classifier

  • Published:
Acoustical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In works on statistical pattern recognition that use learning and examination, results of the learning depend not only on the feature efficiencies, but also on the proportion between the capacity of the decision rule, length of the learning sample, and number of features. It is usually difficult to calculate the recognition errors, which connect these basic quantities for a particular classifier, while the calculations are approximate and do not clearly characterize the results obtained in the process of the study.

The purpose of this work is to develop a simple, clear, and efficient technique for the experimental estimation of the expected classification errors of the recognition engine employed in learning. The algorithm produces a sample of random noise segments, which is included in the recognition algorithm instead of the features of real signals. Portions of this uniform sample imitate different classes. The false learning function is produced as a result of a successive increase in the number of random features used in the recognition. The corresponding growth of the probability of recognizing artificial classes in such a false learning depends on the length of the learning sample and on the capacity of the decision rule employed.

The main result of this work is the false learning function proposed for any particular classifier. The function is obtained for the same length of the learning sample as that of the one used to recognize real signals. The validity of results obtained in real signals can be estimated by comparing this function with experimental signal recognition probabilities with the same number of features.

The simple false learning function is useful to characterize the validity of any experimental results on the statistical signal recognition in acoustics, seismoacoustics, and hydroacoustics; in speech recognition; in medical and industrial diagnostics; in radar; and in other fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. M. Kuznetsov, Akust. Zh. 49, 293 (2003) [Acoust. Phys. 49, 241 (2003)].

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Chudina, Akust. Zh. 49, 551 (2003) [Acoust. Phys. 49, 463 (2003)].

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. K. Kadashnikov and A. I. Mashoshin, Akust. Zh. 44, 462 (1998) [Acoust. Phys. 44, 394 (1998)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Chilton and I. Paraskevas, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2271 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. J. Raudys and A. K. Jain, IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell. 13(3), 252 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. K. Jain and B. Chandrasekaran, in Classification, Pattern Recognition, and Reduction of Dimensionality, Vol. 2 of Handbook of Statistics, Ed. by P. R. Krishnaiah and L. N. Kanal (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982), Vol. 2, pp. 835–855.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. J. Raudys and V. Pikelis, IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell. 2(3), 243 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Fukunaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition (Academic, New York, 1972; Fizmatlit, Moscow, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. T. Tou and R. C. Gonzalez, Pattern Recognition Principles (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1974; Mir, Moscow, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ya. A. Fomin and G. R. Tarlovskii, Statistical Theory of Pattern Recognition (Radio and Svyaz’, Moscow, 1986), p. 364 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Devroye, IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell. 10(4), 530 (1988).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. J. Raudys and R. P. W. Duin, Pattern Recogn. Lett. 19(5–6), 385 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. K. Jain, R. P. W. Duin, and Jianchang Mao, IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(1), 4 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Ruiz, Pattern Recogn. 28(6), 921 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. L. Brailovskii and A. L. Lunts, Tekh. Kibern. (Moscow), No. 1, 20 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. L. Brailovskii, Tekh. Kibern. (Moscow), No. 2, 30 (1964).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. V. L. Brailovskii and A. L. Lunts, Tekh. Kibern. (Moscow), No. 3, 99 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. A. Dubrovskii, T. V. Zorikov, O. Sh. Kvizhinadze, and M. M. Kuratishvili, Sens. Sist. 2(1), 37 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Akusticheski\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l} \) Zhurnal, Vol. 50, No. 5, 2004, pp. 590–602.

Original Russian Text Copyright © 2004 by Goncharov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goncharov, A.N. False learning function of an acoustic signal classifier. Acoust. Phys. 50, 501–511 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1797453

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1797453

Keywords

Navigation