Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Volume and Properties of Imported Soils for Prediction of Carbon Stocks in Soil Constructions in the Moscow Metropolis

  • DEGRADATION, REHABILITATION, AND CONSERVATION OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Development of landscaping in modern cities makes it particularly important to study the properties and functions of artificial soil constructions. Carbon sequestration is one of the main ecological functions of soils, which is actively studied for the soils of natural and agroecosystems but is poorly known for urban and technogenic soils. Anthropogenic impacts are a key factor that influences the formation of carbon stocks in urban soils and, in particular, in soil constructions, characteristic of which is a high and hardly predictable heterogeneity. One of the main factors that determines the carbon pools in the soil constructions of Moscow metropolis is the volume and properties of imported soils. We have analyzed the market of soils supplied to Moscow for landscaping purposes in 2016 and 2017, the sources and volumes of imported soils and their components, their recipes, and properties using the surveys of supplier companies. Based on these data, the predicted average organic carbon stock in the upper (0–10 cm) soil layer is 84 t/ha. A comparison of our estimates and field survey data for a representative sample of Moscow soil monitoring points (n > 190) shows that the prediction gives a 1.5–2.0-fold overestimation. However, a relatively small absolute excess (by 30–40 t/ha) and similar yearly dynamics of the predicted and actual stocks (an increase by 10–14% in 2017 as compared with 2016) confirm the assumption on the decisive role of imported soils in the formation of carbon stocks in the soil constructions of Moscow and emphasize the importance of monitoring and rating of the properties of imported soils as the basis for sustainable development of urban ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. A. Belov and N. K. Belova, “The conditions of green plantations on Boulevard Ring of Moscow city,” Lesn. Vestn. 19 (1), 152–161 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Vasenev, A. P. E. van Oudenhoven, O. N. Romzaykina, and R. A. Hajiaghaeva, “The ecological functions and ecosystem services of urban and technogenic soils: from theory to practice (a review),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 1119–1132 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. I. Vasenev, T. V. Prokof’eva, and O. A. Makarov, “The development of approaches to assess the soil organic carbon pools in megapolises and small settlements,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 685–696 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. N. Vodyanitskii, “Contamination of soils with heavy metals and metalloids and its ecological hazard (analytic review),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 793–801 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu. N. Vodyanitskii, “Organic matter of urban soils: a review,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 802–811 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. A. Vorob’eva, Chemical Analysis of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Summary Report on Assessment Results of Actual Impact of Resolution of the Government of Moscow City no. 74-PP of February 25, 2015 “On the Revision of the Resolution of the Government of Moscow City No. 743-PP of September 20, 2002, No. 1018” (Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow, Moscow, 2017) [in Russian].

  8. G. V. Dobrovol’skii and E. D. Nikitin, Soil Ecology: Theory about Ecological Functions of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Law of Moscow City No. 31 of July 4, 2007 “On Urban Soils” with Changes on February 20, 2019 (Moscow, 2019) [in Russian].

  10. A. S. Kurbatova, V. N. Bashkin, Yu. A. Barannikova, S. G. Gerasimova, E. V. Nikiforova, E. V. Reshetkina, V. A. Savel’eva, D. S. Savin, A. V. Smagin, and A. L. Stepanov, Ecological Functions of Urban Soils (Madzhenta, Smolensk, 2004), p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. V. Lysak, Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2010).

  12. T. G. Makhrova and A. Yu. Sapelin, “Wood introducents in green plantations of the Center of Exhibition of Achievements of National Economy,” Lesn. Vestn. 20 (1), 140–146 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. M. Nikiforova, N. S. Kasimov, and N. E. Kosheleva, “Long-term dynamics of anthropogenic solonetzicity in soils of the Eastern okrug of Moscow under the impact of deicing salts,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 84–94 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Resolution No. 743-PP of September 10, 2002 “Rules for Creation, Maintenance, and Protection of Green Plantations in Moscow City,” Revised on June 17, 2011 (Moscow, 2011) [in Russian],

  15. Resolution of the Government of Moscow City No. 514-PP of July 27, 2004 “On Improvement of Soils in Moscow City,” Revised on June 1, 2018 (Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

  16. T. V. Prokofyeva, I. A. Martynenko, and F. A. Ivannikov, “Classification of Moscow soils and parent materials and its possible inclusion in the classification system of Russian soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 561–571 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. I. S. Prokhorov, “Monitoring of state of urban soils in Moscow city and their possible cultivation,” Pochvoved. Agrokhim., No. 1, 61–68 (2015).

  18. I. S. Prokhorov and S. Yu. Karev, “Specific production of soils and grounds for green plantations and improvement of Moscow city,” Agrokhim. Vestn., No. 3, 21–25 (2012).

  19. L. P. Rysin & L. I. Savel’eva, and S. L. Rysin, “Forest monitoring in urbanized areas,” Russ. J. Ecol. 35, 209–213 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. V. Smagin, Theory and Practice of Soil Construction (Moscow State Univ., Msocow, 2012), p. 544.

  21. A. V. Smagin and N. B. Sadovnikova, “Creation of soil-like constructions,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 981–990 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. N. Stroganova, A. D. Myagkova, and T. V. Prokof’eva, “The role of soils in urban ecosystems,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 30, 82–86 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. A. Khairulina, I. V. Timofeev, and N. E. Kosheleva, “Potentially toxic elements in soils of the industrial area of Perm city,” Geogr. Vestn., No. 2 (49), (2019).

  24. E. Acuña, A. Alejandra, V. Pastenes, and G. Villalobos, “Carbon sequestration and photosynthesis in newly established turfgrass cover in central Chile,” Agron. J. 109 (2), 397–405 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Ajmone-Marsan and M. Biasioli, “Trace elements in soils of urban areas,” Water, Air Soil Pollut. 213, 121–143 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. E. Allaire, C. Dufour-L’Arrivée, J. A. Lafond, R. Lalancette, and J. Brodeur, “Carbon dioxide emissions by urban turfgrass areas,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 88 (4), 529–532 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. E. Blagodatskaya and Y. Kuzyakov, “Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 45, 115–131 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D. A. Brose, L. S. Hundal, O. O. Oladeji, K. Kumar, T. C. Granato, A. Cox, and Z. Abedin, “Greening a steel mill slag brownfield with biosolids and sediments: a case study,” J. Environ. 45, 53–61 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. W. Burghardt, “Soils in urban and industrial environments,” Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 157 (3), 205–214 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Cambou, R. K. Shaw, H. Huot, L. Vidal-Beaudet, G. Hunault, P. Cannavo, F. Nold, and C. Schwartz, “Estimation of soil organic carbon stocks of two cities, New York City and Paris,” Sci. Total Environ. 644, 452–464 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Cekstere, O. Nikodemus, and A. Osvalde, “Toxic impact of the de-icing material to street greenery in Riga,” Latv. Urban For. Urban Greening 7 (3), 207–217 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Decina, L. R. Hutyra, C. K. Gately, J. M. Getson, A. B. Reinmann, A. G. Short Gianotti, and P. H. Templer, “Soil respiration contributes substantially to urban carbon fluxes in the greater Boston area,” Environ. Pollut. 212, 433–439 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Ditterich, C. Poll, G. J. Pronk, K. Heister, A. Chandran, T. Rennert, I. Kögel-Knabner, and E. Kandeler, “Succession of soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in artificial soils,” Pedobiologia 59, 93–104 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Dmitrakova and E. Abakumov, “Dynamics of soil organic carbon of reclaimed lands and the related ecological risks to the additional CO2 emission,” in Proceedings of the 9th SUITMA Congress “Urbanization: Challenge and Opportunity for Soil Functions and Ecosystem Services” (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2019), pp. 97–105.

  35. G. Fourvel, L. Vidal-Beaudet, A. Le Bocq, V. Brochier, F. Théry, D. Landry, T. Kumarasamy, and P. Cannavo, “Early structural stability of fine dam sediment in soil construction,” J. Soils Sediments 18, 2647–2663 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Kumar and L. S. Hundal, “Soil in the city: sustainability improving urban soils,” J. Environ. Qual. 45, 2–8 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Soils within Cities: Global Approaches to Their Sustainable Management—Composition, Properties, and Functions of Soils of the Urban Environment, Ed. by M. J. Levin, K.-H. J. Kim, J. L. Morel, W. Burghardt, P. Charzynski, and R. K. Shaw (Schweizerbart Science, Stuttgart, 2017), pp. 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  38. K. Lorenz and R. Lal, “Biogeochemical C and N cycles in urban soils,” Environ. Int. 35, 1–8 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. K. Lorenz and R. Lal, “Managing soil carbon stocks to enhance the resilience of urban ecosystems,” Carbon Manage. 6, 35–50 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. M. L. McKinney, “Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization,” Biol. Conserv. 127, 247–260 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J. L. Morel, C. Chenu, and K. Lorenz, “Ecosystem services provided by soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining, and military areas (SUITMAs),” J. Soils Sediments 15 (8), 1659–1666 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. T. V. Prokof’eva, M. S. Rozanova, and A. V. Kiriushin, The Technosols on 60–70 Year-Old Technogenic Deposits of the Lomonosov Moscow State University Campus (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2019), pp. 31–41.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. R. V. Pouyat, I. D. Yesilonis, and D. J. Nowak, “Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States,” J. Environ. Qual. 35, 566–75 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. R. V. Pouyat, I. D. Yesilonis, M. Dombos, et al., “A global comparison of surface soil characteristics across five cities,” Soil Sci. 180, 136–145 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Y. L. Qian and R. F. Follett, “Assessing soil carbon sequestration in turfgrass systems using long-term soil testing data,” Agron. J. 94, 30–935 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Raciti, P. Groffman, J. Jenkins, R. Pouyat, T. Fahey, S. Pickett, and M. Cadenasso, “Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen in residential soils with different land-use histories,” Ecosystems 14, 287–297 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Adaptive Soil Management: From Theory to Practices, Ed. by A. Rakshit, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2017), p. 571.

    Google Scholar 

  48. D. A. Sarzhanov, V. I. Vasenev, I. I. Vasenev, Y. L. Sotnikova, O. V. Ryzhkov, and T. Morin, “Carbon stocks and CO2 emissions of urban and natural soils in Central Chernozemic region of Russia,” Catena 158, 131–140 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Townsend-Small and C. I. Czimczik, “Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions in urban turf,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 (2), L02707 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. V. Vasenev and Y. Kuzyakov, “Urban soils as hot spots of anthropogenic carbon accumulation: review of stocks, mechanisms and driving factors,” Land Degrad. Dev. 29 (6), 1607–1622 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. V. I. Vasenev, J. L. Morel, T. Nehls, R. K. Shaw, K. J. Kim, and R. A. Hajiaghayeva, “Preface,” J. Soils Sediments 19 (8), 3123–3126 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. V. I. Vasenev, A. V. Smagin, N. D. Ananyeva, K. V. Ivashchenko, E. G. Gavrilenko, T. V. Prokofeva, A. Patlseva, J. J. Stoorvogel, D. D. Gosse, and R. Valentini, “Urban soil’s functions: monitoring assessment and management,” in Adaptive Soil Management: From Theory to Practices (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2017), pp. 359–409.

    Google Scholar 

  53. V. I. Vasenev, J. J. Stoorvogel, I. I. Vasenev, and R. Valentini, “How to map soil organic carbon stocks in highly urbanized regions?” Geoderma 226–227, 103–115 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vidal-Beaudet L., Schwartz C., Séré G., et al., Using Wastes for Fertile Urban Soil Construction—The French Research Project SITERRE (Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  55. M. Wiesmeier, L. Urbanski, E. Hobley, B. Lang, M. von Lützow, E. Marin-Spiotta, B. van Wesemael, E. Rabot, M. Ließ, N. Garcia-Franco, U. Wollschläger, H.-J. Vogel, and I. Kögel-Knabner, “Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils—A review of drivers and indicators at various scales,” Geoderma 333, 149–162 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. J.-L. Yang and G.-L. Zhang, “Formation, characteristics and eco-environmental implications of urban soils—A review,” Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 61, 30–46 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. G. Zirkle, R. Lal, and B. Augustin, “Modeling carbon sequestration in home lawns,” HortScience 46, 808–814 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to O.N. Romzaikina and S.A. Demina, postgraduate students of the Department of Landscape Design and Sustainable Ecosystems, for their assistance in laboratory analyses and preparation of the manuscript. The data by the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the City of Moscow were used in the work.

Funding

Analysis of the balance and properties of imported soils was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 19-77-30012); analysis of the carbon stock in the Moscow metropolis according to field studies, by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-35-20052); and preparation of the manuscript, by the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (project 5-100).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. P. Brianskaia.

Additional information

Translated by G. Chirikova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brianskaia, I.P., Vasenev, V.I., Brykova, R.A. et al. Analysis of Volume and Properties of Imported Soils for Prediction of Carbon Stocks in Soil Constructions in the Moscow Metropolis. Eurasian Soil Sc. 53, 1809–1817 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320120042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320120042

Keywords:

Navigation