Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of the effects of earthworms and initial substrates on the bacterial community in vermicomposts

  • Soil Biology
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of earthworms and initial substrates on the structural and functional compositions of the bacterial community in vermicomposts have been estimated by the method of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of amplified bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments and by the kinetic method for assessing the physiological state of bacterial communities. ANOVA of the data on structural characteristics of the community (DGGE data) has demonstrated that the nature of the composted substrate has the major effect on the structure of the bacterial community. The associated variance for this factor accounts for 53% and exceeds the effect of earthworms (29%). A functional characterization of the bacterial community (data on the physiological state of bacteria as judged from their growth on different organic compounds) suggests that the presence of earthworms activates the bacterial community by increasing the variable characterizing the physiological state of bacteria (r 0). As has been shown, it is impossible to predict the effect of earthworms on the particular bacterial taxa, because the effects of similar signs (increase, decrease, or the absence of changes in all the variants) just for the three analyzed types of substrates have only been observed for 15% of the operational taxonomic units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. A. Byzov, Zoomicrobial Interactions in Soil (GEOS, Moscow, 2005), [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. V. Gorlenko and P. A. Kozhevin, Multisubstrate Testing of Natural Microbial Communities (MAKS Press, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. A. Dmitriev, Mathematical Statistics in Soil Science (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. G. Zvyagintsev, Soil and Microorganisms (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. A. Zhigzhitova, Extended Abstract of Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Ulan-Ude, 1998).

  6. E. N. Kubarev, N. V. Verkhovtseva, and N. V. Kuz’mina, “Microbial Cenosis of Eisenia fetida Intestines as Dependent on the Substrate, Proc. II Int. Conf. Humans and Animals, (Astrakhan’, 2005), pp. 214–215 [in Russian].

  7. N. V. Kuz’mina, Extended Abstract of Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2005).

  8. N. S. Panikov, Kinetics of the Growth of Microorganisms (Nauka, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. S. Perel’, Distribution Patterns of the Earthworm Fauna in the Soviet Union (Nauka, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laboratory Course on Microbiology, A. I. Netrusova (Ed.), (Akademiya, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. N. Tereshchenko, Eco-Microbiological Aspects of Vermicomposting (Izd. SO RASKhN, Novosibirsk, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. N. Tereshchenko and A. B. Bubina, “Microbiological Mechanisms of the Formation of Fungistatic Properties of Vermicomposts and Vermicompost-Based Substrates,” Sib. Vestn. S.-Kh. Nauki, No. 11, 14–20 (2007).

  13. A. V. Yakushev, Extended Abstract of Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. V. Yakushev, S. A. Blagodatskii, and B. A. Byzov, “The Effect of Earthworms on the Physiological State?of the Microbial Community at Vermicomposting,” Mikrobiologiya 78(4), 565–574 (2009) [Microbiology, 78 (4), 510–519 (2009)].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. V. Yakushev and B. A. Byzov, “Hydrolase Activity as an Indicator of the State of Microbial Community in Vermicomposts,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: pochvoved., no. 2, 41–46 (2009) [Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 62 (2), 93–98 (2009)].

  16. A. Anastasi, G. C. Varese, and V. F. Marchisio, “Isolation and Identification of Fungal Communities in Compost and Vermicompost,” Mycologia 97(3), 33–44 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Aira, F. Monroy, and J. Dominguez, “Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) Activates Fungal Growth, Triggering Cellulose Decomposition during Vermicomposting,” Microb. Ecol. 52, 738–746 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Berkelmans, H. Ferris, M. Tenuta, and A. H. C. van Bruggen, “Long-Term Effects of Crop Management on Trophic Levels of Nematodes Other than Plant Parasitic Nematodes Disappear after One Year of Uniform Treatment,” Appl. Soil Ecol. 23, 223–235 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Gomez-Brandon, C. Lazcano, and J. Dominguez, “The Evaluation of Stability and Maturity during the Composting of Cattle Manure,” Chemosphere 70, 436–444 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Lazcano, M. Gomez-Brandon, and J. Dominguez, “Comparison of the Effectiveness of Composting and Vermicomposting for the Biological Stabilization of Cattle Manure,” Chemosphere 72, 1013–1019 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Lores, M. Gomez-Brando, D. Perez-Diaz, and J. Dominguez, “Using FAME Profiles for the Characterization of Animal Wastes and Vermicomposts,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 2993–2996 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Masciandaro, B. Ceccanti, V. Ronchi, and C. Bauer, “Kinetic Parameters of Dehydrogenase in the Assessment of the Response of Soil to Vermicompost and Inorganic Fertilizers,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 32, 479–483 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Pramanik, G. K. Ghosh, P. K. Ghosal, and P. Banik, “Changes in Organic — C, N, P and K and Enzyme Activities in Vermicompost of Biodegradable Organic Wastes under Liming and Microbial Inoculants,” Biores. Technol. 98(13), 2485–2494 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Sen and T. S. Chandra, “Do Earthworms Affect Dynamics of Functional Response and Genetic Structure of Microbial Community in a Lab-Scale Composting System?,” Biores. Technol. 100, 804–811 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. D. Van Diepeningen, O. J. de Vos, G. W. Korthals, and A. H. C. van Bruggen, “Effects of Organic versus Conventional Management on Chemical and Biological Parameters in Agricultural Soils,” Appl. Soil. Ecol. 31, 120–135 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. D. Van Diepeningen, O. De Vos, V. V. Zelenev, et al., “DGGE Fragments Oscillate with or Counter to Fluctuations in Cultivable Bacteria along Wheat Roots,” Microb. Ecol. 50(4), 506–517 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. I. Vaz-Moreira, M. E. Silva, C. M. Manaia, and O. C. Nunes, “Diversity of Bacterial Isolates from Commercial and Homemade Composts,” Microb. Ecol. 55, 714–722 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Vivas, B. Moreno, S. Garcia-Rodriguez, and E. Benitez, “Assessing the Impact of Composting and Vermicomposting on Bacterial Community Size and Structure, and Microbial Functional Diversity of an Olive-Mill Waste,” Biores. Technol. 100, 1319–1326 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Yasir, Z. Aslam, S. W. Kim, et al., “Bacterial Community Composition and Chitinase Gene Diversity of Vermicompost with Antifungal Activity,” Biores. Technol. 100, 4396–4403 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Yakushev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.V. Yakushev, I.A. Bubnov, A.M. Semenov, 2011, published in Pochvovedenie, 2011, No. 10, pp. 1222–1230.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yakushev, A.V., Bubnov, I.A. & Semenov, A.M. Estimation of the effects of earthworms and initial substrates on the bacterial community in vermicomposts. Eurasian Soil Sc. 44, 1117–1124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311100164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311100164

Keywords

Navigation