Abstract
The variational Rayleigh–Ritz method for bound states in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is formulated and the mathematical foundations of the method are discussed. A review of the most frequently used methods for constructing the Ritz variational basis is given on the example of the helium atom. Numerous applications of variational methods to solving the quantum mechanical three-body bound state problem are considered, and a comparison of the most accurate calculations for various physical systems is given. As a generalization of the variational Rayleigh–Ritz method to “quasi-bound” states (resonances), the complex coordinate rotation (CCR) method and its application to calculating various characteristics of resonances are considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the same work, one can find an exhaustive bibliography on issues concerning the integral (and exponential in particular) expansion of the variational function.
REFERENCES
C. Schwartz, “Further computations of the He atom ground state,” arXiv:math-ph/0605018.
L. I. Ponomarev, “Muon catalysed fusion,” Contemp. Phys. 31, 219 (1991).
T. Yamazaki, N. Morita, R. S. Hayano, E. Widmann, and J. Eades, “Antiprotonic helium,” Phys. Rep. 366, 183 (2002).
M. Hori et al., “Two-photon laser spectroscopy of antiprotonic helium and the antiproton-to-electron mass ratio,” Nature 475, 484 (2011).
M. Hori et al., “Buffer-gas cooling of antiprotonic helium to 1.5 to 1.7 K, and antiproton-to-electron mass ratio,” Science 354, 610 (2016).
J. L. Friar, “The structure of light nuclei and its effect on precise atomic measurements,” Can. J. Phys. 80, 1337 (2002).
I. Sick, “Precise root-mean-square radius of \(^{4}\)He,” Phys. Rev. C 77, 041302 (2008).
J. J. Krauth et al. “Measuring the \(\alpha \)-particle charge radius with muonic helium-4 ions,” Nature 589, 527 (2020).
E. A. Hylleraas, “Über den Grundzustand des Heliumatoms,” Z. Physik. 48, 469 (1928); “Neue Berechnung der Energie des Heliums im Grundzustande, sowie des tiefsten Terms von Ortho-Helium,” Z. Physik. 54, 347 (1929).
L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1949).
T. Kinoshita, “Ground state of the helium atom,” Phys. Rev. 105, 1490 (1957).
C. L. Pekeris, “Ground state of two-electron atoms,” Phys. Rev. 112, 1649 (1958); “\({{1}^{1}}S\) and \({{2}^{3}}S\) states of helium,” Phys. Rev. 115, 1216 (1959).
M. Reed and B. Simon, IV: Analysis of Operators (Academic Press, 1978; Moscow, Mir, 1982).
T. Kato, “Fundamental properties of Hamiltonian operators of Schrödinger type,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 70, 195 (1951);
T. Kato, “On the existence of solutions of the helium wave equation,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 70, 212 (1951).
R. E. Stanton and S. Havriliak, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 1910 (1984);
S. P. Goldman, Phys. Rev. A 28, 2552 (1984);
J. D. Talman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1091 (1986).
R. N. Hill and C. Krauthauser, “A solution to the problem of variational collapse for the one-particle Dirac equation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2151 (1994).
I. P. Grant and H. M. Quiney, “Rayleigh–Ritz approximation of the Dirac operator in atomic and molecular physics,” Phys. Rev. A 62, 022508 (2000).
J. H. Bartlett, J. J. Gibbons, and C. G. Dunn, “The normal helium atom,” Phys. Rev. 47, 679 (1935).
J. H. Bartlett, “The helium wave equation,” Phys. Rev. 51, 661 (1937).
V. A. Fock, “On the Schrödinger equation for the helium atom,” Izv. Akad. Nauk. Fiz. XVIII, 161 (1954).
H. M. Schwartz, “Ritz–Hylleraas solutions of the ground state of two-electron atoms involving fractional powers,” Phys. Rev. 120, 483 (1960).
K. Frankowski and C. L. Pekeris, “Logarithmic terms in the wave functions of the ground state of two-electron atoms.” Phys. Rev. 146, 46 (1966).
C. Schwartz, “Experiment and theory in computations of the He atom ground state,” arXiv:physics/0208004; C. Schwartz, “Experiment and theory in computations of the He atom ground state,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 15, 877 (2006).
W. Kolos, C. C. J. Roothaan, and R. A. Sack, “Ground state of systems of three particles with Coulomb interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 178 (1960).
D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, New-Jersey, Hong Kong, 1988)
R. A. Sack, C. C. J. Roothaan, and W. Kolos, “Recursive evaluation of some atomic integrals,” J. Math. Phys. 8, 1093 (1967).
G. W. F. Drake, “Angular integrals and radial recurrence relations for two-electron matrix elements in Hylleraas coordinates,” Phys. Rev. A 18, 820 (1978).
V. D. Efros, “Three-body problem. Generalized exponential expansion,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 90, 10 (1985).
A. Halpern “\({{(p\mu p)}^{ + }}\) molecule; muon capture in hydrogen,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 660 (1964).
S. I. Vinitskii, V. I. Korobov, and I. V. Puzynin, “Variational calculation of energy levels of \(\mu \)-mesomolecules of hydrogen isotopes, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 91, 705 (1986).
V. I. Korobov, I. V. Puzynin, and S. I. Vinitsky, “Bound states of hydrogen mesic molecular ions: Variational approach. Muon Catal. Fusion,” 7, 63–80 (1992).
S. I. Vinitskii, V. I. Korobov, and I. V. Puzynin, “Variational calculation of the characteristics of weakly bound rotational-oscillatory state of \(dd\mu \) and \(dt\mu \) mesomolecules,” JINR Rapid Communications, No. 19-86 (1986).
S. I. Vinitskii, V. I. Korobov, and I. V. Puzynin, “Refinement of the energy levels of weakly bound rotational-oscillatory state of \(dd\mu \) and \(dt\mu \) mesomolecules,” JINR Rapid Communications, No. 23-87 (1987).
V. I. Korobov, I. V. Puzynin, and S. I. Vinitsky, “A variational calculation of weakly bound rotational-vibrational states of the mesic molecules \(dd\mu \) and \(dt\mu \), Phys. Lett. B 196, 272 (1987).
T. Kato, “On the eigenfunctions of many-particle systems in quantum mechanics,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 10, 151 (1957).
V. I. Kukulin and V. M. Krasnopol’sky, “A stochastic variational method for few-body systems,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. 3, 795 (1977).
K. Varga and Y. Suzuki, “Precise solution of few-body problems with the stochastic variational method on a correlated Gaussian basis,” Phys. Rev. C 52, 2885 (1995).
J. Mitroj, S. Bubin, W. Horiuchi, Ya. Suzuki, L. Adamowicz, W. Cencek, K. Szalewicz, J. Komasa, D. Blume, and K. Varga, “Theory and application of explicitly correlated Gaussians,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 693 (2013).
B. P. Carter, “Muonic molecules and nucleon-deuteron capture,” Phys. Rev. 141, 863 (1966).
C. M. Rosenthal, “The reduction of the multi-dimensional Schrödinger equation to a one-dimensional integral equation,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 10, 381 (1971).
R. L. Somorjai and J. D. Power, “The dimensional and numerical equivalence of the space-filling-curve approach and multi-dimensional integration methods for integral-transform trial functions,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 12, 502 (1972);
J. D. Power and R. L. Somorjai, “Upper and lower bounds to the eigenvalues of two-electron atoms: Proof that the \({{2}^{{1,3}}}S\) states of H\(^{ - }\) are not bound,” Phys. Rev. A 5, 2401 (1972).
J. J. Griffin and J. A. Wheeler, “Collective motions in nuclei by the method of generator coordinates,” Phys. Rev. 108, 311 (1957).
A. J. Thakkar and V. H. Smith Jr., “Compact and accurate integral-transform wave functions. I. The \({{1}^{1}}S\) state of the helium-like ions from H\(^{ - }\) through Mg\(^{{10 + }}\),” Phys. Rev. A 15, 1 (1977).
S. A. Alexander and H. J. Monkhorst, “High-accuracy calculation of muonic molecules using random-tempered basis sets,” Phys. Rev. A 38, 26 (1988).
T. K. Rebane and O. N. Yusupov, “Complex exponential basis wave functions in a Coulomb three-body problem,” Sov. Phys. JETP 71, 1050–1054 (1990).
V. I. Korobov, D. Bakalov, and H. J. Monkhorst, “Variational expansion for the antiprotonic helium atoms,” Phys. Rev A 59, R919 (1999).
A. M. Frolov and V. H. Smith Jr., “Universal variational expansion for three-body systems,” J. Phys. B 28, L449 (1995).
V. I. Korobov, “Coulomb three-body bound-state problem: Variational calculations of nonrelatistic energies,” Phys. Rev. A 61, 064503 (2000).
V. Korobov, “Nonrelativistic ionization energy for the helium ground state,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 024501 (2002).
D. H. Bailey, “Multiprecision translation and execution of Fortran programs,” ACM Trans. Math. Software 19, 288 (1993); “A Fortran 90-based multiprecision system,” 21, 379 (1995).
S. P. Goldman, “Uncoupling correlated calculations in atomic physics: Very high accuracy and ease,” Phys. Rev. A 57, R677 (1998).
B. Grémaud, D. Delande, and N. Billy, “Highly accurate calculation of the energy levels of the H\(_{2}^{ + }\) molecular ion,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 31, 383 (1998).
T. K. Rebane and A. V. Filinskii, “Energies of symmetric three-particle Coulomb systems,” Phys. At. Nucl. 60, 1816–1822 (1997).
R. E. Moss, “Energies of low-lying vibration-rotation levels of H\(_{2}^{ + }\) and its isotopomers,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32, L89 (1999).
G. W. F. Drake and Yan Zong-Chao, “Energies and relativistic corrections for the Rydberg states of helium: Variational results and asymptotic analysis,” Phys. Rev. A 46, 2378 (1992).
A. M. Frolov, “Bound-state properties of the positronium negative ion Ps\(^{ - }\),” Phys. Rev. A 60, 2834 (1999).
Y. Kino, M. Kamimura, and H. Kudo, “High-accuracy 3-body coupled-channel calculation of metastable states of antiprotonic helium atoms,” Nucl. Phys. A 631, 649 (1998).
R. E. Moss, “Calculations for the vibration-rotation levels of H\(_{2}^{ + }\) in its ground and first excited electronic states,” Mol. Phys. 80, 1541 (1993).
H. Nakashima and H. Nakatsuji, “Solving the Schrödinger equation for helium atom and its isoelectronic ions with the free iterative complement interaction (ICI) method,” J. Chem. Phys. 127, 224104 (2007).
D. T. Aznabaev, A. K. Bekbaev, and V. I. Korobov, “Nonrelativistic energy levels of helium atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 012510 (2018).
H. Li, J. Wu, B.-L. Zhou, J.-M. Zhu, and Z.-C. Yan, “Calculations of energies of the hydrogen molecular ion,” Phys. Rev. A 75, 012504 (2007).
Y. Hijikata, H. Nakashima, and H. Nakatsuji, “Solving non-Born-Oppenheimer Schrödinger equation for hydrogen molecular ion and its isotopomers using the free complement method,” J. Chem. Phys. 130, 024102 (2009).
Ye Ning and Zong-Chao Yan, “Variational energy bounds for the hydrogen molecular ion,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 032516 (2014).
J. Aguilar and J. M. Combes, “A class of analytic perturbations for one-body Schrödinger Hamiltonians,” Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 269 (1971).
B. Simon, “Resonances in \(n\)-body quantum systems with dilatation analytic potentials and the foundations of time-dependent perturbation theory,” Ann. Math. 97, 247 (1973).
E. Balslev and J. M. Combes, “Spectral properties of many-body Schrödinger operators with dilatation-analytic interactions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 280 (1971).
Y. K. Ho, “The method of complex coordinate rotation and its applications to atomic collision processes,” Phys. Rep. 99, 1 (1983).
H. L. Cycon, R. G. Froese, W. Kirsch, and B. Simon, Schrödinger Operators with Application to Quantum Mechanics and Global Geometry (Springer, 1987; Moscow, Mir, 1990).
V. I. Korobov, “Coulomb predissociation rates of He\(d\mu \) molecular ions,” Hyperfine Interact. 101/102, 329–332 (1996).
H. Feshbach, “A unified theory of nuclear reactions,” Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 5, 357 (1958);
Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 19, 287 (1962).
V. I. Korobov, “Bethe logarithm for resonant states: Antiprotonic helium,” Phys. Rev. A 89, 014501 (2014).
R. J. Drachman, “A new global operator for two-particle delta functions,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 14, 2733 (1981).
K. Pachucki, W. Cencek, and J. Komasa, “On the acceleration of the convergence of singular operators in Gaussian basis sets,” J. Chem. Phys. 122, 184101 (2005).
L. N. Bogdanova, V. I. Korobov, and L. I. Ponomarev, “Nuclear fusion rates from resonant states of \(^{3}\)He\(d\mu \) molecular ion,” Hyperfine Interact. 118, 183 (1999).
L. I. Ponomarev and S. I. Vinnitskii, “Adiabatic representation in the three body problem with Coulomb interaction, Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 13, 1336 (1982).
P. Froelich and S. A. Alexander, “Structure and dynamics of the doubly excited helium atom,” Phys. Rev. A 42, 2550 (1990).
V. I. Korobov, “Regular and singular integrals for relativistic and QED matrix elements of the Coulomb three-body problem, for an exponential basis set,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, 1959 (2002).
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (New York: Dover, 1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by E. Chernokozhin
Appendices
APPENDIX A
ANALYTICAL CALCULATION OF MATRIX ELEMENTS FOR HYLLERAAS VARIATIONAL EXPANSION
The presentation follows [77].
A1. Basic Recurrence Relation
To calculate integrals of radial variables, we should be able to calculate
By Leibniz’s theorem, we have
Further, using the recurrence relation for binomial coefficients,
we obtain
whence, applying Leibniz’s theorem again, we arrive at the final expression:
A2. Singular Integrals of the Form \(( - 1,m,n)\)
A generating function similar to (17) is obtained by direct integration analytically:
Using (A.3), other integrals of the form \(( - 1,m,n)\) can be obtained by differentiation:
Unfortunately, the method used to generate regular functions \({{\Gamma }_{{lmn}}}(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma )\) cannot be used directly in this case. The factor \({1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {(\beta - \gamma )}}} \right. \kern-0em} {(\beta - \gamma )}}\) makes the recursion unstable.
To overcome this difficulty, we rewrite expression (A.4), assuming that \(\beta > \gamma \), in the form
and introduce a new variable \(u = {{(\beta - \gamma )} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{(\beta - \gamma )} {(\alpha + \gamma )}}} \right. \kern-0em} {(\alpha + \gamma )}}\); then, the following recurrent scheme can be suggested:
To generate the array \({{C}_{{mn}}}\), it is convenient to first differentiate with respect to \(\gamma \), which is given by the recurrence relation,
which requires filling a triangular array \((m,n)\) with \(m,n = 1, \ldots ,M + N\) and \(m + n \leqslant M + N\). The first layer is specified as
Finally, we will define the recursion required to compute a one-dimensional array of functions \({{g}_{m}}\):
which completes the construction of a recurrent scheme for the analytical calculation of integrals of the form \(( - 1,m,n)\). However, when \(u\) is small, forward recursion (A.7) becomes unstable. In this case, it is better to use recursion in the opposite direction:
where \(M\) is chosen in such a way that, if \({{g}_{M}}\) is set to zero, then the error introduced by the value of \({{g}_{M}}\) at this step has decreased to machine epsilon during the backward recursion, by the time when the required value of \(m\) is reached. In particular, when \(u = 0\) (or \(\beta = \gamma \), which is typical of physical systems containing identical particles), we obtain
which allows us to get rid of the indeterminate forms \({0 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {0 0}} \right. \kern-0em} 0}\) during the calculation.
A3. Singular Integrals of the Form \(( - 1, - 1,n)\)
The next step is to calculate singular integrals of the form \({{\Gamma }_{{ - 1, - 1,n}}}(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma )\), which are required, e.g., for obtaining the mean value of the operator \({{{\mathbf{p}}}^{4}}\). Let us start again with the generating function
Here, dilog(x) is the dilogarithm function as defined in the Abramowitz and Stegun reference book [78] (see Appendix B). Next, the computational scheme is defined as follows:
where
where \(u = {{(\beta - \gamma )} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{(\beta - \gamma )} {(\alpha + \gamma )}}} \right. \kern-0em} {(\alpha + \gamma )}}\) and \(v = {{(\alpha - \gamma )} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{(\alpha - \gamma )} {(\beta + \gamma )}}} \right. \kern-0em} {(\beta + \gamma )}}\). The final expression, written in the last line of Eq. (A.9), gives a stable recurrent relation if only the function \({{g}_{0}}(u) = {{u}^{{ - 1}}}\ln(1 + u)\) and its derivatives are calculated in the same way as in the previous section.
A4. Other Singular Integrals
Singular integrals of the form \({{\Gamma }_{{ - 2,m,n}}}(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma )\) are not integrable, but they usually only occur in combinations such as \({{\Gamma }_{{ - 2,m + 2,n}}} - {{\Gamma }_{{ - 2,m,n + 2}}}\), which have finite values. In this situation, it is required to find such a generating function that would give the correct value for the combinations representing the integrands. In this section, we present expressions only for generating functions \({{\Gamma }_{{ - 2,m,n}}}(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma )\) and other singular integrals in a form suitable for calculations:
The last two equations are used in the calculation of the Bethe logarithm when calculating the kinetic energy operator for a basis that includes singular terms of the form \(r_{i}^{{ - 1}}{{e}^{{ - {{\alpha }_{i}}{{r}_{1}} - {{\beta }_{i}}{{r}_{2}} - {{\gamma }_{i}}{{r}_{{12}}}}}}\) in expansion (22).
To get rid of polynomials in \(\alpha \), \(\beta \), and \(\gamma \) in the numerator of complex expressions, one can use the following recursion:
When tabulating \({{\Gamma }_{{lmn}}}\) in the required range of integer parameters \((l,m,n)\), one can then use the general scheme described in [27, 28] to calculate the matrix elements for states with an arbitrary total angular momentum.
APPENDIX B
DILOGARITHM
In this appendix, a convenient way to calculate the dilogarithm function with high precision is presented.
For the dilogarithm function, we use the definition from the Abramowitz and Stegun reference book [78]:
The dilogarithm satisfies the functional relations
which allow one to define the function on the entire complex plane, while it is already defined on the set \(D = \{ x:\left| {x - 1} \right| \leqslant 1,\,\,\operatorname{Re} (x) \geqslant {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}\} \). Next, we use the relation of the dilogarithm with the Debye function:
when the set \(D\) is mapped into \(\left| z \right| < 2\pi \). Finally, the Debye function can be calculated on \(\left| z \right| < 2\pi \) using a rapidly converging power series:
where \({{B}_{{2k}}}\) are the Bernoulli numbers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korobov, V.I. Variational Methods in the Quantum Mechanical Three-Body Problem with a Coulomb Interaction. Phys. Part. Nuclei 53, 1–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779622010038
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779622010038