Skip to main content
Log in

Possible depletion of isomers in perturbed atomic environments

  • Modern Trends in Laser Physics
  • Published:
Laser Physics

Abstract

For atomic-nuclear cooperative processes, the cross sections can be deduced in favorable cases from experiments either directly, or through the linked theoretical estimates. Probability of isomer transmutation in electron-assisted mechanisms must contain both nuclear and atomic components. The nuclear database is abundant and extensive, in particular due to the exploration of electromagnetic nuclear processes, like γ-emission, reactions induced by photons, Coulomb excitation and so on. In the present work, the nuclear excitation rate via NEET mechanism is calculated and compared to known experimental results. The NEEC probability is estimated schematically. Perspectives for NEEC detection within different experimental approaches are discussed. A new method is proposed to search for the isomer depletion under stopping of recoiling nuclei in a gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Walker and G. Dracoulis, Nature 399, 35 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. J. Carroll, Laser Phys. Lett. 1, 275 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. M. Walker and J. J. Carroll, Nucl. Phys. News 17(2), 11 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. M. Walker, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 15, 1637 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. P. Hartouni, M. Chen, M. A. Descalle, J. E. Escher, A. Loshak, P. Navratil, W. E. Ormand, J. Pruet, I. J. Tompson, and T. F. Wang, LLNL Report, LLNL-TR-407631 (Livermore, 2008).

  6. S. A. Karamian, Phys. Part. Nucl. 39, 950 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Morita, Progr. Theor. Phys. 49, 1574 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Kishimoto, Y. Yoda, Y. Kobayashi, S. Kitao, R. Haruki, R. Masuda, and M. Seto, Phys. Rev. C 74, 031301R (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Kishimoto, Y. Yodo, Y. Kobayashi, S. Kitao, R. Haruki, and M. Seto, Nucl. Phys. A 748, 3 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Pallfy, J. Evers, and C. H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 172502 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Palffy, Z. Harman, and W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. A 75, 012709 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Ward, G. Emery, J. Rassmussen, H. Karwowski, and C. Castaneda, Abstracts to APS Meeting, Division of Nucl. Phys. (Oakland 2008).

  13. F. F. Karpeshin and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Phys. At. Nucl. 71, 1384 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. I. N. Izosimov, Laser Phys. 17, 755 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. A. Karamian, J. J. Carroll, L. A. Rivlin, A. A. Zadernovsky, and F. J. Agee, Laser Phys. 14, 166 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. N. Izosimov, J. Nucl. Sci. Techn. Jpn. Suppl. 5, 1 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Bernstein, EBIT Plans in Livermore and Berkeley.” in Proc. of the ECT Workshop on Atomic Effects in Nuclear Excitation and Decay, Trento, Italy, June 15–19, 2009, http://www.ect.it, under link to meetings for 2009.

  18. V. I. Kirischuk, N. V. Strilchuk, and V. A. Zheltonozhsky, in Proc. of Intern. Conf. on Frontiers of Nonlinear Phys., N. Novgorod, Russia, 2004 (Nauka, Moscow, 2005), pp. 477–481, 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Aoki, K. Hosono, K. Tanimoto, M. Terasawa, H. Yamaoka, M. Tosaki, Y. Ito, A. M. Vlaicu, K. Taniguchi, and J. Tsuji, Phys. Rev. C 64, 044609 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. E. V. Tkalya, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022509 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. A. Karamian and J. J. Carroll, Laser Phys. 13, 1182 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. L. Campbell and T. Papp, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 77, 1 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Xiaolong and Z. Chunmei, Nucl. Data Sheets 105, 283 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Crespo-Lopez, Nuclear Excitation with FEL Beams and Recombining Electron Beams”; S. Tashenov, “Stockholm EBIT and Possible Studies on NEEC”; A. Lapierre, “The TITAN EBIT and Prospects of Experiments with Highly Charged Radioactive Ions.” in Proc. of the ECT Workshop on Atomic Effects in Nuclear Excitation and Decay, Trento, Italy, June 15–19, 2009, http://www.ect.it, under link to meetings for 2009.

  25. D. Niemann, M. Grether, M. Rössler, and N. Stolterfoht, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 146, 70 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Shima, N. Kuno, M. Yamanouchi, and H. Tawara, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 51, 173 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Karamian.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Astro, Ltd., 2010.

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karamian, S.A., Carroll, J.J. Possible depletion of isomers in perturbed atomic environments. Laser Phys. 20, 977–984 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X10090355

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X10090355

Keywords

Navigation