Skip to main content
Log in

Sarmatia-Volgo-Uralia junction zone: Isotopic-geochronologic characteristic of supracrustal rocks and granitoids

  • Published:
Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geochronologic (U-Pb isotopic system of zircons) and isotopic-geochemical (Sm-Nd isotopic system of the bulk rock) studies were performed along the profile extending from the eastern Sarmatia (in the west) to the Middle Volga megablock of Volgo-Uralia (in the east), i.e., across the entire junction zone for dating the integration of Sarmatia and Volgo-Uralia, representing two segments of the East European Craton. It is established that the examined rocks are characterized by the Paleoproterozoic Nd isotopic model age, which varies from 2.1 and 2.4 Ga, except for some samples indicating a similar age of the crust through the entire Sarmatia-Volgo-Uralia junction zone. The highly metamorphosed complexes of the granulite and amphibolite facies constituting the southwestern margin of Volgo-Uralia are Paleoproterozoic, not Archean, in age, contrary to previous views. Two Early Paleoproterozoic lithotectonic complexes are defined in Volgo-Uralia: South Volga metasedimentary and Tersa metasedimentary-volcanogenic. The obtained data confirm the asynchronous integration of individual segments into the East European Craton: the integration of Sarmatia and Volgo-Uralia approximately 2100–2000 Ma ago was followed by the conjunction of this newly-formed continent with Fennoscandia ca. 1800 Ma ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. V. Bibikova, S. V. Bogdanova, and R. M. Gorbatschev, “Isotopic Age, Nature, and Structure of the Precambrian Crust in Belarus,” Stratigr. Geol. Korrelyatsiya 3(6), 68–78 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. V. Bibikova, S. V. Bogdanova, A. N. Larionov, et al., “New Data on the Early Archean Age of Granitoids in the Volga-Ural Segment of the East European Craton,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 419, 219–233 (2008) (Doklady Earth Sciences 419, 243–247 (2008)].

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. V. Bogdanova, The Earth Crust of the East European Platform in the Early Precambrian (Exemplified by the Volgo-Uralian Segment) (Nauka, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. V. Bogdanova, “Segments of the East European Craton,” in EUROPROBE in Jablonna, Ed. by D.G. Gee and M. Beckholmen (European Science Foundation-Polish Academy Of Sciences, 1993), pp. 33–38.

  5. S. V. Bogdanova, R. Gorbatschev, and R. G. Garetsky, “The East European Craton,” in Encyclopedia of Geology, Ed. by R.C. Selley, L.R. Cocks, and I.R. Plimer (Elsevier, 2005), pp. 34–49.

  6. S. V. Bogdanova, I. K. Pashkevich, R. Gorbatschev, and M. Orlyuk, “Riphean Rifting and Major Palaeoproterozoic Boundaries in the East European Craton: Geology and Geophysics, Tectonophysics, No. 268, 1–22 (1996).

  7. S. V. Bogdanova, R. Gorbatschev, M. Grad, et al., “EUROBRIDGE: New Insight into the Geodynamic Evolution of the East European Craton,” in European Lithosphere Dynamics, Ed. by D.G. Dee and R.A. Stephenson (Geol. Soc. London, 2006), Memoirs 32, pp. 599–628.

  8. S. V. Bogdanova, R. G. Garetsky, G. I. Karataev, et al., “EUROBRIDGE Project: Paleoproterozoic Accretion and Collision of the Crust in Fennoscandia and Sarmatia. Geology and Geophysical Images,” in Structure and Dynamics of the Lithosphere of Eastern Europe. Results of Studies on the EUROPROBE Program. Essays on Regional Geology, Ed. by N.I. Pavlenkova (Rosnedra, RAN, Geokart, 2006), pp. 221–290 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. M. Chernyshev, Platinum-bearing Formations of the Kursk-Voronezh Region (Voronezh. Univ., Voronezh, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. M. Chernyshev, A. N. Ponomarenko, and E. N. Bartnitskii, “New Data on Age of Ni-bearing Differentiated Plutons of the Voronezh Crystalline Massif,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk AN USSR. Ser. B, No. 6, 35–39 (1990).

  11. N. M. Chernyshev, V. M. Nenakhov, I. P. Lebedev, and Yu. N. Strik, “A Model of Geodynamic History of the Voronezh Massif in the Early Precambrian, Geotektonika, 31(3), 21–30 (1997) [Geotectonics, 31, 186–194 (1997)].

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Claesson, E. V. Bibikova, S. V. Bogdanova, and R. M. Gorbatschev, “Isotopic Evidence of Palaeoproterozoic Accretion in the Basement of the East European Craton,” Tectonophysics 339(1–2), 1–18 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Claesson, E. Bibikova, S. Bogdanova, and V. Skobelev, “Archaean Terranes, Palaeoproterozoic Reworking and Accretion in the Ukrainian Shield, East European Craton,” in European Lithosphere Dynamics, Ed. by D.G. Gee and R.A. Stephenson (Geol. Soc. London, 2006), Memoirs 32, pp. 645–654.

  14. D. J. DePaolo, “Nd Isotopes in the Colorado Front Range and Crust-Mantle Evolution in the Proterozoic,” Nature 291, 193–196 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. M. Herron, “Geochemical Classification of Terrigenous Sands and Shales from Core or Log Data,” J. Sedim. Res. 58, 820–829 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. D. Kinney, A. P. Nutman, and S. A. Occhipinti, “Reconnaissance Dating of Events Recorded in the Southern Part of the Capricorn Orogen,” Precambr. Res. 128, 27–294 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. A. Kremenetskii, V. M. Nenakhov, V. Yu. Skryabin, T. N. Polyakova, R. A. Terent’ev, and G. S. Zolotareva, in Basic Problems of Geotectonics, Ed. by Yu. V. Karyakin (Geos, Moscow, 2007), pp. 360–363 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Krogh, “A Low Contamination Method for Hydrothermal Decomposition of Zircon and Extraction of U and Pb for Isotopic Age Determination,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 37, 485–494 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. A. Lapinskaya, L. P. Popova, A. V. Postnikov, and D. O. Yakovlev, “Geology of Early Cambrian Complexes,” in Crystalline Basement of Tatarstan and Problems of Its Petroleum Resource Potential, Ed. by. R.Kh. Muslimov and T.A. Lapinskaya (Denta, Kazan, 1996), pp. 53–59 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. R. Ludwig, ISOPLOT/EX (Version 2.00). A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel (Berkley Geochronology Center Spec. Publ., 1999), No. 1a.

  21. M. V. Mints, I. B. Filppova, A. K. Suleimanov, et al., “3D Model of the Deep Structure of the Ryazan-Saratov and East Voronezh Collisional Orogens (Eastern Part of the Voronezh Crystalline Massif, East European Platform): Profile 1-EV, 2450–3500 km,” in Models of the Crust and Mantle Based on Results of Deep Seismic Profiling, Ed. by A.A. Lapilin and O.V. Petrov (VSEGEI, St. Petersburg, 2007), pp. 120–125 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. V. Postnikov, Doctorate Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy, Moscow, RGU, 2002.

  23. K. A. Savko, Granulites of the Voronezh Crystalline Massif: Petrology and Evolution of Metamorphism (Voronezh. Univ., Voronezh, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. A. Shchipansky and S. V. Bogdanova, “The Sarmatian Crustal Segment: Precambrian Correlation between the Voronezh Massif and the Ukrainian Shield across the Dnieper-Donets Aulacogen,” Tectonophysics, No. 268, 109–125 (1996).

  25. A. A. Shchipansky, A. V. Samsonov, A. Yu. Petrova, and Yu. O. Larionova, “Geodynamics of the Eastern Margin of Sarmatia in the Paleoproterozoic,” Geotektonika, 411, 43–70 (2007) [Greotectonics 41, 38–62 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. V. Sklyarov, D. P. Gladkochub, T. V. Donskaya, et al., Interpretation of Geochemical Data (Intermet Inzhiniring, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. S. Stacey and J. D. Kramers, “Approximation of Terrestrial Lead Isotope by a Two-stage Model,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett, 26, 207–221 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R. H. Steiger and E. Jager, “Subcommission on Geochronology: Convention of the Use of Decay Constants in Geo- and Cosmochronology,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett, 36, 359–363 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Wybraniec, “Transformations and Visualization of Potential Field Data,” Polish Geol. Inst. Spec. Pap., No. 1, 1–88 (199).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Bibikova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.V. Bibikova, S.V. Bogdanova, A.V. Postnikov, L.P. Popova, T.I. Kirnozova, M.M. Fugzan, V.V. Glushchenko, 2009, published in Stratigrafiya. Geologicheskaya Korrelyatsiya, 2009, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 3–16.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bibikova, E.V., Bogdanova, S.V., Postnikov, A.V. et al. Sarmatia-Volgo-Uralia junction zone: Isotopic-geochronologic characteristic of supracrustal rocks and granitoids. Stratigr. Geol. Correl. 17, 561–573 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S086959380906001X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S086959380906001X

Key words

Navigation