Abstract
The probabilities of additional monopole excitation (shake-up) and ejection (shake-off) processes for electrons of the L and M shells upon K and L ionization for atoms with 3 ≤ Z ≤ 38 are calculated in the sudden perturbation approximation. With increasing atomic number, the portion of the nl-electron shake-offs in the total probability of monopole shake-up/shake-off processes increases from several percent in the beginning of the nl subshell population to above 50% after its filling. Within one shell, the shake-off processes are relatively more probable for electrons with smaller orbital quantum numbers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Maĭzel’, G. Leonkhardt, and R. Sargan, X-Ray Spectra and Chemical Bond (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1981) [in Russian].
I. B. Borovskiĭ, R. V. Vedrinskiĭ, V. L. Kraĭzman, and V. P. Sachenko, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 149(2), 275 (1986) [Sov. Phys. Usp. 29 (6), 539 (1986)].
A. G. Kochur, A. M. Nadolinsky, and V. F. Demekhin, J. Phys. Colloq. 47, C8 (1986).
A. G. Kochur, A. M. Nadolinskiĭ, and V. F. Demekhin, Opt. Spektrosk. 64, 1157 (1988) [Opt. Spectrosc. 64, 688 (1988)].
R. Preseren, A. Kodre, I. Arcon, and M. Borowski, J. Synchrotron Rad. 8, 279 (2001).
A. G. Kochur and D. Petrini, Phys. Scr. T 115, 125 (2005).
A. G. Kochur, A. M. Nadolinskiĭ, and V. F. Demekhin, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. 33, 105 (1990).
K. Siegbahn, C. Nordling, A. Fahlman, et al., Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Ups. 20, 1–282 (1967) [Russian translation: Mir, Moscow, 1971].
G. B. Armen and F. P. Larkins, J. Phys. B 24, 741 (1991).
S. A. Novikov, A. G. Kochur, and V. L. Sukhorukov, Chem. Phys. Lett. 208, 545 (1993).
A. G. Kochur, S. A. Novikov, and V. L. Sukhorukov, Chem. Phys. Lett. 222, 411 (1994).
S. A. Novikov, Ya. S. Akopyan, and A. G. Kochur, J. Phys. B 32, 925 (1999).
T. A. Carlson, W. E. Hunt, and M. O. Krause, Phys. Rev. 151(1), 41 (1966).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 3: Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, 3rd ed. (Nauka, Moscow, 1974; Pergamon, New York, 1977).
T. A. Carlson, C. W. Nestor, T. C. Tucker, and F. B. Malik, Phys. Rev. 169(1), 27 (1968).
V. P. Sachenko and V. F. Demekhin, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 49(3), 765 (1965) [Sov. Phys. JETP 22, 532 (1966)].
T. Mukoyama and K. Taniguchi, Phys. Rev. A 36(2), 693 (1987).
A. G. Kochur, A. I. Dudenko, and D. Petrini, J. Phys. 35, 395 (2002).
T. Mukoyama, X-ray Spectrometry 28, 491 (1999).
A. G. Kochur and D. Petrini, Astron. Astrophys. 365, 248 (2000).
A. G. Kochur and D. Petrini, Astron. Astrophys. 393, 1081 (2002).
A. G. Kochur and D. Petrini, J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 137–140, 329 (2004).
R. Kau, I. D. Petrov, V. L. Sukhorukov, and H. Hotop, Z. Phys. D 39, 267 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.G. Kochur, V.A. Popov, 2006, published in Optika i Spektroskopiya, 2006, Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 706–712.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kochur, A.G., Popov, V.A. The relative role of shake-up and shake-off processes in additional monopole excitation of L and M electrons due to inner atomic shell ionization. Opt. Spectrosc. 100, 645–651 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X0605002X
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X0605002X