Skip to main content
Log in

Charm hadroproduction within k T -factorization approach

  • Elementary Particles and Fields
  • Theory
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the problem of describing heavy-quark production in high-energy hadron collisions, a comparison is made between the theoretical status and numerical predictions of two approaches, the traditional parton model in the leading order (LO) and the k T-factorization approach. Basic assumptions underlying relevant calculations are discussed. A very simple gluon structure function and a fixed coupling constant are chosen for the calculations in order to highlight distinctions associated with the use of nonidentical matrix elements in these two approaches. It is shown that, in the k T-factorization approach, formal LO calculations performed with allowance for the Sudakov form factor include many terms usually treated as next-to-leading-order (NLO) contributions of the traditional parton model (or even contributions next to NLO ones, NNLO).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Nason, S. Dawson, and R. K. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. B 303, 607 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Altarelli et al., Nucl. Phys. B 308, 724 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Nason, S. Dawson, and R. K. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. B 327, 49 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Beenakker, H. Kuijf, W. L. van Neerven, and J. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 40, 54 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Beenakker, W. L. van Neerven, R. Meng, et al., Nucl. Phys. B 351, 507 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. B 373, 295 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Frixione, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, Preprint CERN-TH/97-16 (Geneva, 1997); hep-ph/9702287.

  8. BEATRICE Collab. (M. Adamovich et al.), Phys. Lett. B 348, 256 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. BEATRICE Collab. (Y. Alexandrov et al.), Phys. Lett. B 433, 217 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu. M. Shabelski, Talk given at HERA Monte Carlo Workshop, April 27–30, 1998, DESY, Hamburg; hep-ph/9904492.

  11. S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni, and F. Hautmann, Phys. Lett. B 242, 97 (1990); Nucl. Phys. B 366, 135 (1991).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. C. Collins and R. C. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. B 360, 3 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Marchesini and B. R. Webber, Nucl. Phys. B 386, 215 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Catani and F. Hautmann, Phys. Lett. B 315, 475 (1993); Nucl. Phys. B 427, 475 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Camici and M. Ciafaloni, Nucl. Phys. B 467, 25 (1996); Phys. Lett. B 396, 406 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. V. Gribov, E. M. Levin, and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Rep. 100, 1 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. M. Levin and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Rep. 189, 267 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. E. M. Levin, M. G. Ryskin, Yu. M. Shabelski, and A. G. Shuvaev, Yad. Fiz. 53, 1059 (1991) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 53, 657 (1991)].

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. M. Levin, M. G. Ryskin, Yu. M. Shabelski, and A. G. Shuvaev, Yad. Fiz. 54, 1420 (1991) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 54, 867 (1991)].

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu. L. Dokshitzer, I. M. Dyakonov, and S. I. Troyan, Phys. Rep. 58, 270 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ya. I. Azimov, O. P. Strogova, and Yu. M. Shabel’skii, Yad. Fiz. 57, 715 (1994) [Phys. At. Nucl. 57, 674 (1994)].

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 308, 833 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. B 405, 507 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Blümlein, Preprint DESY 95-121 (Hamburg, 1995).

  25. E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 72, 377 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 199 (1977)].

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. G. P. Korchemsky and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 437, 415 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage, and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D 28, 228 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. M. G. Ryskin, Yu. M. Shabelski, and A. G. Shuvaev, Z. Phys. C 69, 269 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B 341, 73 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. P. Ball, M. Beneke, and V. M. Braun, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3929 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Wenjie, O. P. Strogova, L. Cifarelli, and Yu. M. Shabel’skii, Yad. Fiz. 57, 900 (1994) [Phys. At. Nucl. 57, 844 (1994)].

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. P. Baranov and M. Smizanska, Phys. Rev. D 62, 014012 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Kwiechinski, Z. Phys. C 29, 561 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Yadernaya Fizika, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2001, pp. 123–134.

Original Russian Text Copyright © 2001 by Ryskin, Shuvaev, Shabelski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shabelski, Y.M., Ryskin, M.G. & Shuvaev, A.G. Charm hadroproduction within k T -factorization approach. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 64, 120–131 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1344950

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1344950

Keywords

Navigation