Abstract
In the problem of describing heavy-quark production in high-energy hadron collisions, a comparison is made between the theoretical status and numerical predictions of two approaches, the traditional parton model in the leading order (LO) and the k T-factorization approach. Basic assumptions underlying relevant calculations are discussed. A very simple gluon structure function and a fixed coupling constant are chosen for the calculations in order to highlight distinctions associated with the use of nonidentical matrix elements in these two approaches. It is shown that, in the k T-factorization approach, formal LO calculations performed with allowance for the Sudakov form factor include many terms usually treated as next-to-leading-order (NLO) contributions of the traditional parton model (or even contributions next to NLO ones, NNLO).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Nason, S. Dawson, and R. K. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. B 303, 607 (1988).
G. Altarelli et al., Nucl. Phys. B 308, 724 (1988).
P. Nason, S. Dawson, and R. K. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. B 327, 49 (1989).
W. Beenakker, H. Kuijf, W. L. van Neerven, and J. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 40, 54 (1989).
W. Beenakker, W. L. van Neerven, R. Meng, et al., Nucl. Phys. B 351, 507 (1991).
M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. B 373, 295 (1992).
S. Frixione, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, Preprint CERN-TH/97-16 (Geneva, 1997); hep-ph/9702287.
BEATRICE Collab. (M. Adamovich et al.), Phys. Lett. B 348, 256 (1995).
BEATRICE Collab. (Y. Alexandrov et al.), Phys. Lett. B 433, 217 (1998).
Yu. M. Shabelski, Talk given at HERA Monte Carlo Workshop, April 27–30, 1998, DESY, Hamburg; hep-ph/9904492.
S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni, and F. Hautmann, Phys. Lett. B 242, 97 (1990); Nucl. Phys. B 366, 135 (1991).
J. C. Collins and R. C. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. B 360, 3 (1991).
G. Marchesini and B. R. Webber, Nucl. Phys. B 386, 215 (1992).
S. Catani and F. Hautmann, Phys. Lett. B 315, 475 (1993); Nucl. Phys. B 427, 475 (1994).
S. Camici and M. Ciafaloni, Nucl. Phys. B 467, 25 (1996); Phys. Lett. B 396, 406 (1997).
L. V. Gribov, E. M. Levin, and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Rep. 100, 1 (1983).
E. M. Levin and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Rep. 189, 267 (1990).
E. M. Levin, M. G. Ryskin, Yu. M. Shabelski, and A. G. Shuvaev, Yad. Fiz. 53, 1059 (1991) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 53, 657 (1991)].
E. M. Levin, M. G. Ryskin, Yu. M. Shabelski, and A. G. Shuvaev, Yad. Fiz. 54, 1420 (1991) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 54, 867 (1991)].
Yu. L. Dokshitzer, I. M. Dyakonov, and S. I. Troyan, Phys. Rep. 58, 270 (1980).
Ya. I. Azimov, O. P. Strogova, and Yu. M. Shabel’skii, Yad. Fiz. 57, 715 (1994) [Phys. At. Nucl. 57, 674 (1994)].
J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 308, 833 (1988).
M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. B 405, 507 (1993).
J. Blümlein, Preprint DESY 95-121 (Hamburg, 1995).
E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 72, 377 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 199 (1977)].
G. P. Korchemsky and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 437, 415 (1995).
S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage, and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D 28, 228 (1983).
M. G. Ryskin, Yu. M. Shabelski, and A. G. Shuvaev, Z. Phys. C 69, 269 (1996).
S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B 341, 73 (1994).
P. Ball, M. Beneke, and V. M. Braun, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3929 (1995).
Liu Wenjie, O. P. Strogova, L. Cifarelli, and Yu. M. Shabel’skii, Yad. Fiz. 57, 900 (1994) [Phys. At. Nucl. 57, 844 (1994)].
S. P. Baranov and M. Smizanska, Phys. Rev. D 62, 014012 (2000).
J. Kwiechinski, Z. Phys. C 29, 561 (1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
__________
Translated from Yadernaya Fizika, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2001, pp. 123–134.
Original Russian Text Copyright © 2001 by Ryskin, Shuvaev, Shabelski.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shabelski, Y.M., Ryskin, M.G. & Shuvaev, A.G. Charm hadroproduction within k T -factorization approach. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 64, 120–131 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1344950
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1344950