Wacquant, urban marginality, territorial stigmatization and social work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss2id226Keywords:
Wacquant, social work, neo-liberalsim, urban marginality, territorial stigmatizationAbstract
Loic Wacquant is currently Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. He has written extensively on issues related to urban poverty, race and the expansion of imprisonment. Wacquant is heavily influenced by the work of the late Pierre Bourdieu. Specifically, Wacquant employs Bourdieu's theoretical tools of analysis to provide a critique of contemporary neo-liberal social and penal policy. This article considers the potential applications of Wacquant’s scholarship to contemporary social work practice. For the purposes of this analysis, Wacquant’s work is divided into three broad areas: the analysis of neo-liberalism and precarious forms of employment, the development of the penal state and his critical approach to doxa. Bourdieu uses the term doxa to refer to those views or opinions that are taken for granted within any society. They thus create the limits of, or provide a strong framework for, political and policy debates. It is argued that Wacquant’s theorisation provides an explanation of the forces that have led to the concentration of areas of poverty in the midst of relative affluence. In addition to facing long-standing problems of high unemployment, poor housing and a lack of social amenities, these areas - the banlieues in France, housing projects in the USA and estates in England - are stigmatized in public and media discourse. Wacquant’s work can be used to challenge the development of a form of social work that places emphasis on bureaucratic managerialism. In addition, it should encourage social work as a profession to re-engage with criminal justice issues. Finally, the critical approach to doxa provides a model for social work to challenge the limitations of current debates.
References
Adkins, L., & Skeggs, B. (Eds.). Feminism After Bourdieu. Oxford: Blackwell.
Alexander, M. (2012). The New Jim Crow; MassIncarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.
Barr, B., Taylor-Robinson, D., Stuckler, D. et al. (2015). “First do no harm” are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal study. J Epidemiol Community Health doi:10.1136/jech-
-206209.
Beddoe, L. (2014). Feral families, troubled families; the spectre of the underclass in New Zealand. NZ Sociology, 29(3), 51-68.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, pp.241-258.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). The Left Hand and the Right Hand of the State, in P. Bourdieu Acts of Resistance, pp. 1-10. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu et al. (1999). The Weight of the World Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, Instrumentalism and the Humane Project in Social Work: Identifying the Informal Logics of Risk Management in Children’s Statutory Services. British
Journal of Social Work, pp. 1-19.
Casey, L. (2016). Lessons from Rotherham and my work with troubled families in Rethinking Children’s Services Fit for the Future? http://www.catch-22.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2016/04/Rethinking-Childrens-Services-FINAL.pdf
Clear, T. (2009). Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse. New York: OUP.
Corston, J. (2007). The Corston Report. www.justice.gov.uk http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/corstonreport-march-2007.pdf
Crossley, S. (2015). ‘Realising the (troubled) family’, ‘crafting the neoliberal state’. Families, Relationships and Societies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/
X14326465757666
Cummins, I. (2013). Using Simon’s Governing through crime to explore the development of mental health policy in England and Wales since 1983. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34(3), 325-337.
Cummins, I. (2016). Mental Health and the Criminal Justice System: A social work perspective. St Albans: Critical Publishing.
Drake, C., & Cayton, H. (1993) (4th Ed). Black Metropolis: A Study of Negro Life in a Northern City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Drucker, E. (2011). A Plagues of Prisons; The Epidemiology of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: New Press.
Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Reimagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics by Hubert L. Dreyfus & Paul Rabinow. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Garrett, P. (2013). Social Work and Social Theory: Making Connections. Bristol: Policy Press.
Garrett, PM (2014). Re-enchanting social work? The emerging ‘spirit ‘of social work in an age of economic crisis. British Journal of Social Work, 44(3), pp.503-521.
Garrett, P. (2015). Words matter: deconstructing ‘welfare dependency’ in the UK. Critical and Radical Social Work, 3(3), pp. 389-40.
Giroux, H. (2011). Neoliberalism and the death of the social state: remembering Walter Benjamin’s Angel of History Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 17(4), 2011.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identities New York. NY: Simon and Schuster.
Harcourt, B. (2011). The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order. Cambridge, Mass Harvard University Press.
IFSW (2014) http://ifsw.org/get-involved/global-definition-ofsocial-
work/
Institute for Criminal Policy Research (2016), World prison brief. United Kindom: England and Wales. Retrieved from http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/united-kingdom-england-wales
Jensen, T. (2014). Welfare, common sense, poverty porn and doxosophy, Sociological Research Online, 19(3). Retreived from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/3/3.html
Kemshall, H. (2010). Risk Rationalities in Contemporary Social Work Policy and Practice. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), pp 1247–1262.
Levitas, R. (2012). There may be ‘trouble’ ahead: what we know about those 120,000 ‘troubled’ families. Policy Response Series No. 3 - Poverty and Social Exclusion in the UK. http://www.poverty.ac.uk/policy-responseworking-papers-families-social-policy-life-chanceschildren-parenting-uk-government
Marmot, M. (2015). The Health Gap: The Challenge of an Unequal World. London: Bloomsbury.
Mauer, M. (2006). The Race to Incarcerate. New York: New Press.
Mckenzie, L. (2015). Getting By Estates, class and culture in austerity. Britain, Bristol: Policy Press.
Measor, L. (2013). Loic Wacquant, gender and cultures of resistance. In P. Squires, & J. Lea (Eds.), Criminalisation and advanced marginality; Critically exploring the work of Loic Wacquant (pp. 129-151). Bristol: Policy Press.
Meade, L. (1992). The New Politics Of Poverty: The Nonworking Poor In America. New York: Basic Books.
Murray, C. (1990). The Emerging British Underclass (Choice in Welfare). London: IE.
Mooney, G. (2011). Stigmatizing Poverty? “The Broken Society” and reflections on anti-welfarism in the UK Today. Oxford: Oxfam.
Morriss, L. (2016). Being Seconded to a Mental Health Trust: The (In) Visibility of Mental Health Social Work. British Journal of Social Work. pp 1–17.
Parton, N. (2014). Social Work, Child Protection and Politics: Some Critical and Constructive Reflections. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), pp.2042-2056.
Savage, M. (2015). Social Class in the 21st Century (Pelican Introduction). London: Pelican.
Sayer, A. (2015). Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Bristol: Policy Press.
Shildrick, T., Blackburn S., & MacDonald, R. (2009). Young people, class and place. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(5), pp.457-465.
Simon, J. (2007). Governing Through Crime How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. Oxford: OUP.
Simon, J. (2014). Mass Incarceration on Trial. NewYork: New Press.
Skeggs, B. (2004). Exchange, value and affect: Bourdieu and ‘the self’. The Sociological Review. 52 (Supplement s2).
Slater, T. (2009) ‘Ghettos’ and ‘Anti-urbanism’. Entries in R. Kitchin and N. Thrift (Eds.). The International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography. London: Elsevier.
Slater, T. (2012). The Myth of “Broken Britain”: Welfare Reform and the Production of Ignorance. Antipode 0, pp. 1-22.
Standing, G. (2014). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.
Stedman-Jones, G. (2013). Outcast London: A study in the relationship between classes in Victorian society. London: Verso.
Sutton, L. (2009). They’d only call you a scally if you are poor: The importance of socio-economic status on children’s identities. Children’s Geographies. 7(3), 277-290.
Taylor, C. (2003). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Tyler, I. (2008). Chav Mum, chav scum class disgust in contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies, 8(1) pp 17-34.
Tyler, I. (2013). Revolting Subjects Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
Wacquant, L. (2000). Body & Soul: Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer. Oxford: OUP.
Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial Stigmatization in the Age of Advanced Marginality.” Thesis Eleven, 91, 66-77.
Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wacquant, L. (2008). Ghettos and Anti-Ghettos: An Anatomy of the New Urban Poverty. Thesis Eleven, 94, 113-118.
Wacquant, L. (2009). Prisons of Poverty. Minneapolis: UM Press.
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Wacquant, L. (2009). “The Body, the Ghetto and the Penal State.” Qualitative Sociology, 32(1), 101-129.
Warner, J. (2013). Social work, class politics and risk in the moral panic over Baby P. Health, Risk & Society, 15(3), pp 217-233.
Webb, S. (2006). Social Work in a Risk Society: Social and Political Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Webber, M., Reidy, H., Ansari, D., Stevens, M., & Morris, D. (2014). Enhancing social networks: a qualitative study of health and social care practice in UK mental health services. Health and Social Care in the Community. pp 1-10.
Welshman, J. (2013). (2nd edition). Underclass: A History of the Excluded Since 1880. Bloomsbury: London.
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Penguin.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
