Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(6), 1859-1866 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563061859

Analysis of Possibilities of Detectnig the Manipulation of Financial Statements in Terms of the IFRS and Czech Accounting Standards

Zita Drábková
Department of Finance and Accounting, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Branišovská 1645/31a, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic

The main objective of financial statements is to give information. The diversity of interests and objectives of individual groups of users and creators of financial statements presents the risk of manipulation of financial statements in the context of true and fair view as defined in the national accounting legislation. The paper is concerned with the different possibilities of detecting the manipulation of financial statements in terms of the Czech Accounting Standards and IFRS. The paper analyzes the selected risk detection models of the manipulation of financial statements using creative accounting methods, off-balance sheet financing methods and accounting frauds in specific case studies of selected accounting unit in terms of Czech accounting standards. Based on the analysis and comparison of the results thereof, the paper presents and evaluates the alternatives of users of financial statements to evaluate the risk of manipulation of financial statements beyond the scope of a fair and true view. The evaluation further includes a comparison of uses of these models with respect to the International Financial Reporting Standards.

Keywords: financial statements, detection of the risk of manipulating financial statements
Grants and funding:

This paper was supported by GAJU [No. 149/20014/S].

Prepublished online: December 26, 2015; Published: January 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Drábková, Z. (2015). Analysis of Possibilities of Detectnig the Manipulation of Financial Statements in Terms of the IFRS and Czech Accounting Standards. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(6), 1859-1866. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563061859
Download citation

References

  1. AMAT, O., BLAKE, J. 2006. The ethics of creative accounting. [Online]. Stanford: Economic Working Paper. Available at: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/upfupfgen/349.htm/. [Accessed: 15 January 2015].
  2. BELL, A. C. 2009. Data Analysis for Corporate Fraud Risk. USA: Charlotte, North Carolina.
  3. BENEISH, M. D. 2001. Earnings management: a perspective. Managerial Finance, 27(12): 3-17. DOI: 10.1108/03074350110767411 Go to original source...
  4. BRENNAN, N., MCGRATH, M. 2007. Financial Statement Fraud. Some Lessons From US and European Case Studies. Australian Accounting Review, 17(42): 49-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2007.tb00443.x Go to original source...
  5. CIMA, 2009. Fraud risk management. A guide to good practice. [Online]. Available at: http://www.cimaglobal.com/documents/importeddocuments/cid_techguide_fraud_risk_management_feb09.pdf.pdf/. [Accessed: 15 January 2015].
  6. DODWELL, W. 2008. Six Years of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: "Are We Better Off?" The CPA Journal, 12(8): 38-43.
  7. TATE, D. 2011. Fraud Prevention & Detection CPA. [Online]. Available at: http://davidtate.us;tateatty@yahoo.com/. [Accessed: 15 January 2015].
  8. DRÁBKOVÁ, Z. 2013. The potential to reduce the risk of manipulation of financial statements using the identification models of creative accounting. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(7): 2055-2063. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361072055 Go to original source...
  9. DRÁBKOVÁ, Z. 2013. Possibilities to reduce audit risk using the CFEBT model to identify creative accounting and fraud in term of Czech accounting standards. In: Conference proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Inproforum University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, 7-8 November. České Budějovice: University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, 59-63.
  10. ERNST & YOUNG. 2012. Zpráva o boji s podvody. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ey.com/CZ/cs/Newsroom/News-releases/Podvody-realisticka-reseni-realnych-rizik. [Accessed: 15 January 2015].
  11. HENSELMANN, K., HOFMANN, S. 2010. Accounting Fraud. Berlin: Erich Schimidt Verlag GmbH & Co. KG. Go to original source...
  12. JONES, M. 2010. Creative accounting, Fraud and International accounting scandals. UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  13. MANTONE, S. P. 2013. Using Analytics to Detect Possible Fraud: Tools and Techniques. UK: Wiley. Go to original source...
  14. MURPHY, A. G. 2011. Foreign corrupt practices act. UK: Wiley. Go to original source...
  15. PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS 2014. Global Economic Crime Survey 2014. [Online]. Available at: http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/economic-crime-survey/. [Accessed: 15 January 2015].
  16. SINGLETON, T. W., SINGLETON, J. S. 2010. Fraud auditing and forensic accounting. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
  17. VOCHOZKA, M. 2011. Metody komplexního hodnocení podniku. Praha: Grada.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.