Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the educational value of clinical vignettes from the society of general internal medicine national meeting in the internal medicine clerkship

A pilot study

  • Innovations In Education
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Whether the clinical vignettes presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) annual meeting could be of educational value to third year students in the Internal Medicine clerkship has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relevance and learning value of clinical vignettes from the SGIM national meeting in the Internal Medicine clerkship.

SETTING: Third year Ambulatory Internal Medicine clerkship at one academic medical center (academic year 2005 to 2006).

METHODS: Students were introduced to the clinical vignette and oriented to the database of clinical vignettes available through the SGIM annual meeting website. Students then reviewed 5 to 10 clinical vignettes using a worksheet, and rated the learning value of each vignette using a 5-point Likert scale (1=least, 5=greatest). A single investigator evaluated congruence of the vignette with the Clerkship Directors of Internal Medicine (CDIM)-SGIM curriculum to assess relevance.

MAIN RESULTS: A total of 42 students evaluated 371 clinical vignettes from the 2004 and 2005 meetings. The clinical vignettes were curriculum-congruent in 42.6% (n=175), and clearly incongruent in 40.4% (n=164). The mean rating for learning value was 3.8 (± 1.0) (5 signifying greatest learning value). Curriculum-congruent vignettes had a higher mean learning value compared with curriculum-incongruent vignettes (4.0 vs 3.6, Student’s t-test, P=.017).

CONCLUSION: The clinical vignettes presented at the national SGIM meeting offer clinical content that is relevant and of some educational value for third year clerkship students. Based on this pilot study, the educational value and strategies for their use in the clinical clerkships deserve further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Society of General Internal Medicine. Instructions for On-line Review of Submissions. Available at http://www.sgim.org/am06/COSRound2ReviewerInstructions.pdf, Accessed May 7, 2006.

  2. American College of Physicians. Writing a Clinical Vignette (Case Report) Abstract. Available at http://www.acponline.org/srf/abstracts/clinvin_abs.htm, Accessed May 7, 2006.

  3. Wright SM, Kouroukis C. Capturing zebras: what to do with a reportable case. Can Med Assoc J. 2000;163:429–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Estrada CA, Heudebert GR, Centor RM. JGIM new section. Case reports and clinical vignettes. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SGIM/CDIM Core Medicine Clerkship Curriculum Guide. Available at http://www.sgim.org/clerkshipguide.cfm, Accessed May 7, 2006

  6. Goroll AH, Morrison G, Bass EB, et al. Reforming the core clerkship in internal medicine: the SGIM/CDIM Project. Society of General Internal Medicine/Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:30–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kernan WN, Fagan MJ, Michael Elnicki D. The clerkship directors in internal medicine’s agenda for advancing medical student education in internal medicine. Am J Med. 2004;117:713–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. LaPook JD. Proposal of an international case-report database. Lancet. 2000;356:169–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users’ Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 2000;284:1290–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chou R, Helfand M. Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:1090–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vandenbroucke JP. In defense of case reports and case series. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:330–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James L. Wofford MD, MS.

Additional information

No conflicts of interest to delcare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wofford, J.L., Singh, S. Exploring the educational value of clinical vignettes from the society of general internal medicine national meeting in the internal medicine clerkship. J Gen Intern Med 21, 1195–1197 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00596.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00596.x

Key Words

Navigation