Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond the medical record

Other modes of error acknowledgment

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies before and since the 1999 Institute of Medicine report have noted the limitations of using medical record reporting for reliably quantifying and understanding medical error. Quantitative macro analyses of large datasets should be supplemented by small-scale qualitative studies to provide insight into micro-level daily events in clinical and hospital practice that contribute to errors and adverse events and how they are reported.

DESIGN: The study design involved semistructured face-to-face interviews with residents about the medical errors in which they recently had been involved and included questions regarding how those errors were acknowledged.

OBJECTIVE: This paper reports the ways in which medical error is or is not reported and residents’ responses to a perceived medical error.

PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six residents were randomly sampled from a total population of 85 residents working in a 600-bed teaching hospital.

MEASUREMENTS: Outcome measures were based on analysis of casers residents described. Using Ethnograph and traditional methods of content analysis, cases were categorized as Documented, Discussed, and Uncertain.

RESULTS: Of 73 cases, 30 (41.1%) were formally acknowledged and Documented in the medical record; 24 (32.9%) were addressed through Discussions but not documented; 19 cases (26%) cases were classified as Uncertain. Twelve cases involved medication errors, which were acknowledged in different categories.

CONCLUSIONS: The supervisory discussion, the informal discussion, and near-miss contain important information for improving clinical care. Our study also shows the need to improve residents’ education to prepare them to recognize and address medical errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Error Is Human. Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan TA. The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors—could it do harm? N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1123–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Becher EC, Chassin MR. Improving quality, minimizing error: making it happen. Health Aff. 2001;20:68–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McDonald CJ, Weiner M, Hui SL. Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in Institute of Medicine report. JAMA. 2000;284:93–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird NM, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Error in medicine: what have we learned? Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:763–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barach P, Berwick DM. Patient safety and the reliability of health care systems. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:997–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. Br Med J. 2000;320:759–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:812–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA. 2001;286:415–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hofer TP, Kerr EA. What is an error? Eff Clin Pract. 2000;6:261–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent C. Understanding and responding to adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1051–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leape L, Epstein AM, Hamel MB. A series on patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1272–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Helmreich RL, Schaefer HG. Team performance in the operating room. In: Bogner MS, ed. Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994:225–53.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Hospitals as cultures of entrapment. Calif Manage Rev. 2003;45:73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenthal M. The Incompetent Doctor: Behind Closed Doors. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reason J. Human Error. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weick K. Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. Calif Manage Rev. 29:112–27.

  20. Campion EW. A death at Duke. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1083–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaba DM, Howard SK. Fatigue among clinicians and the safety of patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1249–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Battles JB, Shea CE. A system of analyzing medical errors to improve GME curricula and programs. Acad Med. 2001;76:125–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. de Leval MR, Carthey J, Wright DF, Farewell VT, Reason JT. Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:661–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sorokin R, Claves JL, Kane GC, Gottlieb JE. The near miss resident conference; understanding the barriers to confronting medical errors. Semin Med Pract. 2002;5:12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adye B. Quality begets patient safety. Am J Surg. 2001;181:389–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt CE, Bottini T. Improving medication safety and patient care in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2003;29:12–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Biddle C, Oaster TRF. Investigating the nature of the morbidity and mortality conference. Acad Med. 1990;65:420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Feldman L, Barkun A, Sampalis J, Rosenberg L. Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based strategy: comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds. Surgery. 1997;122:711–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Harbison SP, Regehr G. Faculty and resident opinions regarding the role of morbidity and mortality conference. Am J Surg. 1999;177:136–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kinzie JD, Maricle RA, Bloom JD, et al. Improving quality assurance through psychiatric mortality and morbidity conferences in a university hospital. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992;43:470–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Renfrew DL, Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 172 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology. 1992;183:145–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shapiro J, Larsen K, Jacokes D. The psychosocial M & M: a tool in reinterpreting problematic medical situations. Fam Med. 1990;22:437–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Thompson JS, Prior MA. Quality assurance and morbidity and mortality conference. J Surg Res. 1992;52:97–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zipper L, Cushman SW. Lessons in Patient Safety. Chicago, IL: National Patient Safety Foundation; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language. 2nd edition unabridged. Springfield, MA: G and G Merriam Company; 1961.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilynn M. Rosenthal PhD.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

This work was supported by grants from the Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Michigan (Log no. 4148, OVPR, December 21, 1999), and the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, University of Michigan—Dearborn, 2000.

Human Subjects Review Committee, University of Michigan—Dearborn, November 1, 1999; research site, Clinical Research Committee (R-98-477), November 30, 1999; Nondisclosure Agreement Between the University of Michigan and the research site, 1999.

Data protected under the State of Michigan Public Health Act, Section 333.215.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenthal, M.M., Cornett, P.L., Sutcliffe, K.M. et al. Beyond the medical record. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 404–409 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0098.x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0098.x

Key words

Navigation