Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T14:17:24.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring a Moral Landscape: Genetic Science and Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Barbara Nicholas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This project draws on scholarship of feminist and womanist scholars, and on results of interviews with scientists currently involved in molecular genetics. With reference to Margaret Urban Walker's “practices of moral responsibility,” the social practices of molecular geneticists are exphred, and strategies identified through which scientists negotiate their moral responsibilities. The implications of this work for scientists and for feminists are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , Winter 2001 , pp. 45 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asch, Adrienne, and Geller, Gail. 1996. Feminism and bioethics: Beyond reproduction. Ed. Wolf, S. M.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayern, Kurt. 1994. GenEthics: Technohgical intervention in human reproduction as a philosophical problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Urlich. 1992. Risk society. Trans. Ritter, Mark. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1987. The generalised and the concrete other.In Women and moral theory, ed. Kittay, E. E. and Meyers, D. T.Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1986. Feminist approaches to science. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cannon, Katie. 1988. Black womanist ethics. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Eve Browning. 1993. PMosophy and feminist criticism. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Cole, Eve Browning, and Coultrap McQuin, Susan, eds. 1992. Explorations in feminist ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Donchin, Anne, and Purdy, Laura M., eds. 1999. Embodying bioethics. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. 1997. Moral responsibility and social change: A new theory of self. Hypatia 12 (3): 116–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuss, Diana. 1989. Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature and differences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1993. Bodies and knowledges: Feminism and the crisis of reason. In Feminist epistemohgies, ed. Alcoff, L. and Potter, E.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_MiUenium. FemaleMan_Meets_ OncoMouse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1988. Lesbian ethics. Palo Alto: Institute of Lesbian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1990. The politics of women's biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1995. Transparent women, visible genes and the new conceptions of genes. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 4: 291–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth, and Ward, Elijah. 1993. Exploding the gene myth. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1982. Feminism and science. In Feminist theory: A critique of ideology, ed. Keohane, N.Chicago: Harvester.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Anne, Cunningham‐Burley, Sarah, and Amos, Amanda. 1997. The new genetics: Professionals' discursive boundaries. Sociological Review 45 (May): 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen, and Hammonds, Evelyn. 1990. Conflicts and tensions in feminist study of gender and science. In Conflicts in feminism, ed. Hirsh, Marianne and Keller, Evelyn Fox. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mann, Patricia S. 1994. Micropolitics and agency in a postfeminist era. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Emily. 1991. The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male‐female roles. Signs 16 (3): 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Alastair. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Alastair. 1988. Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McLauglin, Andrew. 1985. Images and ethics of nature. Environmental Ethics 7 (Winter): 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The death of nature. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria, and Shiva, Vandana. 1993. Ecofeminism. Halifax: Fernwood Publications.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Barbara. 1999. Molecular geneticists and moral responsibility: “Maybe if we were working on the atom bomb I would have a different argument.” Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan. 1989. Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics 99: 229–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Rayna. 1993. Accounting for amniocentesis. In Knowledge, power and practice: The anthropology of medicine and everyday life, ed. Lindenbaum, S. and Lock, M.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1970. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Hilary. 1994. Love, power and knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1996. Democracy's discontent. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saul, John Ralston. 1997. The unconscious civilization. Victoria, Austalia: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Susan. 1989. Feminist and medical ethics. Hypatia 4 (2): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherwin, Susan. 1992. No longer patient. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. 1997. Biopiracy. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Soper, Kate. 1995. What is nature? Culture, politics and the non‐human. Oxford: Black‐well.Google Scholar
Spanier, Bonnie. 1995. IM/Parital Science: Gender ideology in molecular biology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1988. Inessential women: Problem of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1991. The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tong, Rosemarie. 1989. Feminist thought. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Tong, Rosemarie. 1993. Feminine and feminist thought. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Tong, Rosemarie. 1997. Feminist approaches to bioethics: Theoretical reflections and practical applications. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1998. Moral understandings: A feminist study in ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and thin. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Sharon. 1990. A feminist ethic of risk. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan M., ed. 1996. Feminism and bioethics: Beyond reproduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar