Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:53:25.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ethic of Care vis-â-vis the Ethic of Rights: A Problem for Contemporary Moral Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

Carol Gilligan has delineated two ethics, the ethic of rights and the ethic of care. In this article I argue that the two ethics are part of one overall system, the ethic of care functioning as a necessary base for the ethic of rights. 1 also argue that the system is seriously flawed. Because women are held accountable to both ethics and because the two ethics frequently conflict, women recurrently find themselves in a moral double bind.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Emily. 1988. Who really cares? The Women's Review of Books 5(8): 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Judy, et al. 1985. Commentary on Gilligan's in a different voice. Feminist Studies 11(1): 149–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1985. What do women want in a moral theory? Nous 19(Mar): 5364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1986a. Trust and anti‐trust. Ethics 96(2): 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1986b. Extending the limits of moral theory. Journal of Phibsophy 83(10): 538–44.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1987. Hume, the women's moral theorist?in Women and moral theory, ed.Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diane T.Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Beck, Evelyn Torton. 1988. The politics of Jewish invisibility. NWSA Journal 1(1): 93102.Google Scholar
Bernick, Susan E. 1992. Philosophy and feminism: The case of Susan Bordo. Hypatia 7(3): 188–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Larry, Homiak, Marcia, Housman, Judy, and Scheman, Naomi. 1973-74. Altruism and women's oppression. The Philosophical Forum 5(1‐2): 222–47.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1992. “Maleness” revisited. Hypatia 7(3): 197207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, John M. 1983. Women's rationality and men's virtues. Social Research 50: 597642.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 1988. Justice, care, gender bias. The Journal of Philosophy 85(9): 451–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, Paula. 1984. The myth of masochism. American Psychologist 39: 130–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, Paula, and Hall‐McCorquodale, Ivan. 1985. Mother‐blaming in major clinical journals. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 55(3): 345–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Card, Claudia. 1985. Virtues and moral luck. Working Series 1, no. 4, Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Law School.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1988. Women's voices and ethical ideals: Must we mean what we say? Ethics 99(1): 125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1990. Caring and evil. Hypatia 5(1): 101–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1991. Feminist ethics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routeldge.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathy. 1992. Toward a feminist rhetoric: The Gilligan debate revisited. Women's Studies International Forum 15(2): 219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Stefano, Christine. 1983. Masculinity as ideology in political theory. Women's Studies International Forum 6(6): 633–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exdell, John. 1987. Ethics, ideology, and feminine virtue. In Science, morality, and feminist theory, ed.Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Owen J. 1982. Virtue, sex, and gender: Some philosophical reflections on the moral psychology debate. Ethics 92(3): 500–02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Owen J., and Jackson, Kathryn. 1987. Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg‐Gilligan debate revisited. Ethics 97(3): 622–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1985. Abraham, Socrates, and Heinz: Where are the women?In Moral dilemmas: Philosophical and psychological issues in the development of moral reasoning, ed.Harding, Carol. Chicago: Precedent Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1987. Beyond caring: The de‐moralization of gender. In Science, morality, and feminist theory, ed.Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1991a. The social self and the partiality debates. In Feminist ethics, ed.Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1991b. The practice of partiality. Ethics 101(4): 818–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1990. A response to Lesbian ethics. Hypatia 5(3): 132–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1992a. Willful virgin: Essays in feminism. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1992b. The body philosophical. In The knowledge explosion: Generations of feminist scholarship, ed.Kramarae, Cheris and Spender, Dale. New York: Teachers College Press (Athene Series).Google Scholar
Gigueira‐McDonough, Josefina, and Sarri, Rosemarry. 1987. The trapped woman: Catch‐22 in deviance and control. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1986. Reply. Signs 11(2): 324–33.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1987. Moral orientation and moral development. In Women and moral theory, ed.Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, and Wiggins, Grant. 1986. The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1987. The curious coincidence of feminine and African moralities: Challenges for feminist theory. In Women and moral theory, ed.Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T.Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hardwig, John. 1984. Should women think in terms of rights? Ethics 94(3): 441–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoagland, Sara Lucia. 1990. Some concerns about Nel Noddings' Caring. Hypatia 5(1): 109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoagland, Sara Lucia. 1991. Some thoughts about “caring.” In Feminist ethics, ed.Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1981. Ain'tI a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1989. Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1987. Rescuing womanly virtues: Some dangers of moral reclamation. In Science, morality, and feminist theory, ed.Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1988. Gilligan and the politics of a distinctive women's morality. In Feminist perspectives: Philosophical essays on methods and morals, ed.Code, Lorraine, Mullet, Sheila, and Overall, Christine. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1990. Caring and exploitation. Hypatia 5(1): 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1987. Sex inequality and bias in sex differences research. In Science, morality, and feminist theory, ed.Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1991. Feminist ethics: Projects, problems, prospects. In Feminist ethics, ed.Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K., Greens, Catherine C., Maccoby, Eleanore E., Luria, Zella, Stack, Carol B., and Gilligan, Carol. 1986. On ina Different Voice: An interdisciplinary forum. Signs 11(2): 304–33.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1982. A reply to Owen Flanagan and some comments on the Puka‐Goodpaster exchange. Ethics 92(3): 513–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrabee, Mary Jeanne, ed. 1993. An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 1987. Playfulness, ‘world’‐traveling, and loving perception. Hypatia 2(2): 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, María. 1991. On the logic of pluralist feminism. In Feminist ethics, ed.Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Lugones, María, and Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1983. Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism, and the demand for the woman's view. Hypatia 1, published as Women's Studies International Forum 6(6): 573–81. Reprinted in Hypatia Reborn (Indiana University Press), 1990.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1991. Does sexuality have a history? Michigan Quarterly Review 30:111.Google Scholar
Miller, Alice. 1983. For your own good: Hidden cruelty in child‐rearing and the roots of violence. Translated by Hildegarde Hannum and Hunter Hannum. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Miller, Alice. 1990. Banished knowledge: Facing childhood injuries. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Miller, Jean Baker. 1976. Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kathryn Pauly. 1987. Women and moral madness. In Science, morality, and feminist theory, ed.Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O'Barr, Jean E, Pope, Deborah, and Wyer, Mary, eds. 1990. Ties that bind: Essays on mothering and patriarchy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1977. The conditions for work: The common world of women. In On lies, secrets, and silence. New York: W. W Norton.Google Scholar
Ringelheim, Joan. 1985. Women and the holocaust: A reconsideration of research. Signs 10(4): 741–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1993. Feminism, ideology, and deconstruction: A pragmatist view. Hypatia 8(2): 96103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Lillian B. 1983. Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1984. Maternal thinking. In Mothering: Essays in feminist theory, ed.Trebilcot, Joyce. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Jean P. 1990. Constructing Maternal Thinking. Hypatia 5(3): 125–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, William. 1971. Blaming the victim. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1983. Individualism and the objects of psychology. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science, ed.Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merill B.Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Sichel, Betty, and Tuana, Nancy, eds. 1991. Feminism and morality. APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 90(2): 83121.Google Scholar
Simons, Margaret A. 1984. Motherhood, feminism, and identity. Hypatia 2. published as Women's Studies International Forum 7(5): 349‐59. Reprinted in Hypatia Reborn (Indiana University Press), 1990.Google Scholar
Singer, Linda. 1987. Value, power, and gender: Do we need a different voice? In Power, gender, values, ed.Genova, Judith. Edmonton, Alberta: Academic Printing and Publishing.Google Scholar
Sommers, Tish, et al. 1987. Women take care: The consequences of caregiving in today's society. Gainesville, Fla.: Triad.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1988. Inessential woman:Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Trebilcot, Joyce, ed. 1984. Mothering: Essays in feminist theory. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 1987. Beyond gender difference: Toward a theory of care. Signs 12(4): 644–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 1989. Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring? In Gender/body/knowledge, ed.Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan R.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Upin, Jane S. 1992. Applying the concept of gender: Unsettled questions. Hypatia 7(3): 180–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Beverly M. 1981. Psychology and feminism—If you can't beat them, join them. In Men's studies modified, ed.Spender, Dale. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1989. Moral understandings: Alternative “epistemology” for a feminist ethics. Hypatia 4(2): 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1992. Feminism, ethics, and the question of theory. Hypatia 7(3): 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1973-74. Theories of sex differences. The Philosophical Forum 5(1‐2): 5480.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1982. Women and medicine: An introduction. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7(2): 119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1983a. A different reality: Feminist ontology. In Beyond domination: New perspectives on women and philosophy, ed.Gould, Carol C.Totowa, N J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1983b. The maternal instinct (1972) and Afterword (1982). In Mothering: Essays in feminist theory, ed.Trebilcot, Joyce. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1983c. The moral implications of regarding women as people: New perspectives on pregnancy and personhood. In Abortion and the status of the fetus, ed.Bondeson, William B.et al. Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1984. Love, knowledge, and transformation. Women's Studies International Forum 7(5): 393405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1985. Humanism, gynocentrism, and feminist politics. Women's Studies International Forum 8(3): 173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar