To read this content please select one of the options below:

Noise trading and stock market bubbles: what the derivatives market is telling us

Scott B. Beyer (Department of Finance and Business Law, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA)
J. Christopher Hughen (Reiman School of Finance, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)
Robert A. Kunkel (Department of Finance and Business Law, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 13 May 2020

Issue publication date: 3 November 2020

344

Abstract

Purpose

The authors examine the relation between noise trading in equity markets and stochastic volatility by estimating a two-factor jump diffusion model. Their analysis shows that contemporaneous price deviations in the derivatives market are statistically significant in explaining movements in index futures prices and option-market volatility measures.

Design/methodology/approach

To understand the impact noise may have in the S&P 500 derivatives market, the authors first measure and evaluate the influence noise exerts on futures prices and then investigate its influence on option volatility.

Findings

In the period from 1996 to 2003, this study finds significant changes in the volatility and mean reversion in the noise level and a significant increase in its relation to implied volatility in option prices. The results are consistent with a bubble in technology stocks that occurred with significant increases in noise trading.

Research limitations/implications

This study provides estimates for this model during the periods preceding and during the technology bubble. The study analysis shows that the volatility and mean reversion in the noise level are much stronger during the bubble period. Furthermore, the relation between noise trading and implied volatility in the futures market was of a significantly larger magnitude during this period. The study results support the importance of noise trading in market bubbles.

Practical implications

Bloomfield, O'Hara and Saar (2009) find that noise traders lower bid–ask spreads and improve liquidity through increases in trading volume and market depth. Such improved market conditions could have positive effects on market quality, and this impact could be evidenced by lower implied volatility when noise traders are more active. Indeed, the results in this study indicate that the level and characteristics of noise trading are fundamentally different during the technology bubble, and this noise trading activity has a larger impact during this period on implied volatility in the options market.

Originality/value

This paper uniquely analyzes derivatives on the S&P 500 Index in order to detect the presence and influence of noise traders. The authors derive and implement a two-factor jump diffusion noise model. In their model, noise rectifies the difference of analysts' opinions, market information and beliefs among traders. By incorporating a reduced-form temporal expression of heterogeneities among traders, the model is rich enough to capture salient time-series characteristics of equity prices (i.e. stochastic volatility and jumps). A singular feature of the authors’ model is that stochastic volatility represents the random movements in asset prices that are attributed to nonmarket fundamentals.

Keywords

Citation

Beyer, S.B., Hughen, J.C. and Kunkel, R.A. (2020), "Noise trading and stock market bubbles: what the derivatives market is telling us", Managerial Finance, Vol. 46 No. 9, pp. 1165-1182. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2019-0052

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles