To read this content please select one of the options below:

The relationship between project management process characteristics and performance outcomes

Gita Mathur (Department of Organization and Management, San José State University, San José, California, USA)
Kam Jugdev (Faculty of Business, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Canada)
Tak Shing Fung (Information Technologies Department, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)

Management Research Review

ISSN: 2040-8269

Article publication date: 14 October 2014

2528

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to examine the links between project management process characteristics and project-level and firm-level performance outcomes to test the hypotheses that project management assets being valuable, rare, inimitable and having organizational support leads to competitive advantage.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper analyzes data from responses to an online survey by 198 North American Project Management Institute® members. Regression analysis is used to examine the relationship between six factors extracted from an exploratory factor analysis that comprise the three project management asset characteristics – valuable, rare and inimitable, three factors that comprise organizational support for the project management process, and two factors that comprise project management performance outcomes – project-level and firm-level performance.

Findings

Organizational support for the project management process, specifically project management integration, was found to significantly contribute to both project-level and firm-level performance. Of the asset factors examined, valuable project management knowledge was found to contribute to project-level and firm-level performance, though information technology (IT) tools did not. Inimitable proprietary tangible assets were found to contribute to both project-level and firm-level performance, and inimitable embedded intangible assets were also found to contribute to firm-level performance. Rare knowledge sharing tools and techniques were found to negatively contribute to project-level performance.

Research limitations/implications

Limitations of this study include sample size, response rate and self-report bias, calling for a larger sample in ongoing research.

Practical implications

This study draws managerial attention to project management assets as sources of competitive advantage, highlighting the need to have organizational support for the project management process through organizational integration, and emphasizing the importance of valuable project management knowledge-based assets and inimitable project management assets that are proprietary and tangible as well as those that are embedded and intangible.

Originality/value

Few papers have applied the resource-based view of the firm to examine project management capabilities as a source of competitive advantage. This paper contributes to the literature on the resource-based view of the firm and to an improved understanding of project management as a source of competitive advantage.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by San José State University, Athabasca University, and a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada. The authors would like to acknowledge the study participants for completing the survey.

Citation

Mathur, G., Jugdev, K. and Shing Fung, T. (2014), "The relationship between project management process characteristics and performance outcomes", Management Research Review, Vol. 37 No. 11, pp. 990-1015. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2013-0112

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles