To read this content please select one of the options below:

Examining the role of stakeholder pressure and knowledge management on supply chain risk and demand responsiveness

David E. Cantor (Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA)
Jennifer Blackhurst (Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA)
Mengyang Pan (Department of Management Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA)
Mike Crum (Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA)

The International Journal of Logistics Management

ISSN: 0957-4093

Article publication date: 6 May 2014

2450

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the supply chain risk management literature by examining how stakeholders place pressure on the firm to engage in risk management activities.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper utilizes a survey approach to test the nomological model. The analysis was carried out using structural equation modeling techniques.

Findings

The results demonstrate that stakeholders place pressure on the firm to mitigate risk and that knowledge management (KM) and joint planning activities with suppliers serve as mediating roles in the model. The process-oriented model reveals that these factors influence the firm's ability to be responsive to customer demand.

Originality/value

The research represents one of the first papers to empirically test how stakeholder theory and KM contributes to risk mitigation activities. Additionally, the paper shows the impact of KM factors on risk mitigation activities. The paper attempts to explain from both a theoretical and empirical perspective how and why firms are engaging in risk mitigation activities and how the impacts demand responsiveness.

Keywords

Citation

E. Cantor, D., Blackhurst, J., Pan, M. and Crum, M. (2014), "Examining the role of stakeholder pressure and knowledge management on supply chain risk and demand responsiveness", The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 202-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-10-2012-0111

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles