To read this content please select one of the options below:

Union Autonomy in Context: An International Comparison

Patricia Fosh (The Management School, Imperial College, University of London, UK)
Huw Morris (Kingston Business School, Kingston University, UK)
Roderick Martin (Glasgow University Business School, UK)
Paul Smith (School of Management and Finance, Nottingham University, UK)
Roger Undy (Templeton College, Oxford University, UK)

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Article publication date: 1 April 1993

243

Abstract

This is the second of two linked articles on the question of union autonomy; the first appeared in the previous issue of this journal. It considers state control and approach to union autonomy in the wider context of state controls on unions′ bargaining activities including industrial action. Two questions are posed: whether there is any “balance” between state respect for union autonomy and state confidence that union collective bargaining activities take place within a legally prescribed framework; and how the state in the UK was able to shift so rapidly from the traditional, voluntary approach and the incipient neo‐corporatism of the 1970s, to the detailed and onerous regulation of union internal and external activities in the 1980s and 1990s.

Keywords

Citation

Fosh, P., Morris, H., Martin, R., Smith, P. and Undy, R. (1993), "Union Autonomy in Context: An International Comparison", Employee Relations, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459310043306

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1993, MCB UP Limited

Related articles