Download citation
Download citation
link to html
VIV oxyfluorides are of inter­est as frustrated magnets. The successful synthesis of two-dimensionally connected vanadium(IV) oxyfluoride structures generally requires the use of ionic liquids as solvents. During solvothermal synthesis experiments aimed at producing two- and three-dimensional vanadium(IV) selenites with triangular lattices, the title compound, di­aqua­tetra-μ-fluorido-dioxidodivanadium(IV) monohydrate, V2O2F4(H2O)2·H2O, was discovered and features a new infinite V4+-containing two-dimensional layer comprised of fluorine-bridged corner- and edge-sharing VOF4(H2O) octa­hedral building units. The synthesis was carried out under solvothermal conditions. The V4+ centre exhibits a typical off-centring, with a short V=O bond and an elongated trans-V—F bond. Hydrogen-bonded water mol­ecules occur between the layers. The structure is related to previously reported vanadium oxyfluoride structures, in particular, the same layer topology is seen in VOF3.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229615024122/fn3211sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229615024122/fn3211Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 1442717

Introduction top

Our recent work has focused on the preparation of VIV oxyfluorides due to their inter­est as frustrated magnets. We have found that the successful synthesis of two-dimensionally connected vanadium(IV) oxyfluoride structures, for example, kagome lattices, requires the use of ionic liquids as solvents (Aidoudi et al., 2011a,b, 2014; Clark et al., 2015). On the other hand, there have been several previous reports of solvothermally synthesized vanadium compounds incorporating selenium, which are generally two- and three-dimensional in nature, and can attribute this high-dimensional structural property to the incorporation of selenium-based anionic linkers (Nguyen et al., 2011; Glor et al., 2011). Reduced dimensionally-extended vanadium compounds can also be prepared by these routes, for example, VO(SeO2OH)2 (Kim et al., 2010) and (4,4'-bi­pyridine)V2Se2O8 (Dai et al., 2003). During solvothermal synthesis experiments aimed at producing two- and three-dimensional vanadium(IV) selenites with triangular lattices, a new V4+ layer structure, V2O2F4(H2O)2.H2O, (I), was discovered. This is apparently the first example of a fully reduced V4+ layered compound synthesized by solvothermal (rather than ionothermal) techniques. The structure is comprised of VOF4(H2O) corner- and edge-sharing o­cta­hedral building units. V2O2F4(H2O)2.H2O or VOF2(H2O).1/2H2O, (I), is related structurally to previously synthesized vanadium oxyfluoride compounds, VOF3 (Supel et al., 2007).

Experimental top

Synthesis and crystallization top

Vanadium trifluoride (VF3, Alfa, 98%; 0.002 mol, 0.215 g) and ethyl­ene glycol (Fisher 99%+; 0.0032 mol, 0.2 ml) were added to a 40% solution of HF (0.5 ml, Alfa). Di­ethyl­amine [guanidine carbonate salt (0.001 mol, 0.09 g) was used in a different experiment in place of di­ethyl­amine and produced similar results] (Sigma, 99.5%; 0.001 mol, 0.5 ml) and selenious acid (Aldrich 99.999%; 0.001 mol, 0.129 g) were added to the resultant mixture before being sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. This was heated at 393 K for 4 d, then allowed to cool to ambient temperature. The final product was filtered, washed in water and allowed to dry overnight at 333 K. The crystals obtained were blue blocks, indicating V4+, of typical dimension 0.06 × 0.04 × 0.03 mm. These were separated from the bulk product, a brown powder, under an optical microscope. The crystals recovered were too scarce to be analysed using powder X-ray diffraction or to be sent for elemental analysis.

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. H atoms were located from Fourier maps and refined isotropically.

Results and discussion top

The VOF4(H2O) building unit of (I) (Fig. 1) exhibits a single vanadium site in a distorted o­cta­hedral environment (Fig. 2) and a single uncoordinated water molecule. The short VO bond length along with the longer trans V—F and cis V—OH2 bond lengths are comparable to those seen in the cis-building unit of [C6H4N22][VOF4(H2O)]2.H2O, (II) (Aldous et al., 2007). Selected bond lengths for (I) and (II) are shown for comparison in Table 2. The o­cta­hedral units are linked via fluoride ligands to produce a new two-dimensional corner and edge-sharing layer compound of V4+ (Fig. 3a). Bond-valence-sum analysis (Brese & O'Keeffe, 1991) confirms the oxidation state of the vanadium centre as V4+, oxidized in situ from V3+ (Table 3). The layer in (I) resembles that of the VOF3 structure, (III) (Supel et al., 2007), with both forming a layer comprised of corner- and edge-sharing o­cta­hedral units bridged via fluoride ligands (Fig. 3b). Aside from the different vanadium oxidation states, there are a number of significant differences between these two structures. The presence of uncoordinated water molecules in (I) results in longer inter-layer V···V distances, due to the hydrogen bonding from atom O3 to the layer [O3···H2 = 1.86 (4) Å and H2—O2 = 0.86 (4) Å], compared to those in (III) (Table 4). The elongated trans-fluoride ligand, F1, in (I) is involved in the edge-sharing V—F bonds, while in (III), the equivalent ligand is involved in the corner-sharing V—F bond. This results in a significant difference in the intra-layer V···V distances (Table 4). The layers of (I) can be seen to stack in a `staggered" manner (Fig. 4a.), while the layers in (III) stack in an `eclispsed' manner (Fig. 4b) when both are viewed along [010]. There are many previous examples of layered V4+-containing compounds that have synthesized solvothermally (Nguyen et al., 1995; Massa et al., 2002); however, these compounds owe their two-dimensional structural properties to phosphate and sulfate linkers. More recently, there have been examples of V4+-containing layers, synthesized via ionothermal methods (Aidoudi et al., 2011a,b, 2014). These compounds exhibit two-dimensional layers comprised fully of V4+ corner-sharing o­cta­hedral units. This appears to make compound (I) the first example of a purely V4+ layered compound produced via solvothermal techniques. From the presented synthesis route, compound (I) appears as a minor phase, together with a majority unidentified phase(s). Several further attempts to prepare (I) as the majority phase were unsuccessful. The synthetic method will need to be refined in order to produce (I) as the bulk phase, but this could lead to a simpler more cost-effective route, compared to ionothermal techniques, to obtain layered V4+ compounds for physical property investigation.

Structure description top

Our recent work has focused on the preparation of VIV oxyfluorides due to their inter­est as frustrated magnets. We have found that the successful synthesis of two-dimensionally connected vanadium(IV) oxyfluoride structures, for example, kagome lattices, requires the use of ionic liquids as solvents (Aidoudi et al., 2011a,b, 2014; Clark et al., 2015). On the other hand, there have been several previous reports of solvothermally synthesized vanadium compounds incorporating selenium, which are generally two- and three-dimensional in nature, and can attribute this high-dimensional structural property to the incorporation of selenium-based anionic linkers (Nguyen et al., 2011; Glor et al., 2011). Reduced dimensionally-extended vanadium compounds can also be prepared by these routes, for example, VO(SeO2OH)2 (Kim et al., 2010) and (4,4'-bi­pyridine)V2Se2O8 (Dai et al., 2003). During solvothermal synthesis experiments aimed at producing two- and three-dimensional vanadium(IV) selenites with triangular lattices, a new V4+ layer structure, V2O2F4(H2O)2.H2O, (I), was discovered. This is apparently the first example of a fully reduced V4+ layered compound synthesized by solvothermal (rather than ionothermal) techniques. The structure is comprised of VOF4(H2O) corner- and edge-sharing o­cta­hedral building units. V2O2F4(H2O)2.H2O or VOF2(H2O).1/2H2O, (I), is related structurally to previously synthesized vanadium oxyfluoride compounds, VOF3 (Supel et al., 2007).

The VOF4(H2O) building unit of (I) (Fig. 1) exhibits a single vanadium site in a distorted o­cta­hedral environment (Fig. 2) and a single uncoordinated water molecule. The short VO bond length along with the longer trans V—F and cis V—OH2 bond lengths are comparable to those seen in the cis-building unit of [C6H4N22][VOF4(H2O)]2.H2O, (II) (Aldous et al., 2007). Selected bond lengths for (I) and (II) are shown for comparison in Table 2. The o­cta­hedral units are linked via fluoride ligands to produce a new two-dimensional corner and edge-sharing layer compound of V4+ (Fig. 3a). Bond-valence-sum analysis (Brese & O'Keeffe, 1991) confirms the oxidation state of the vanadium centre as V4+, oxidized in situ from V3+ (Table 3). The layer in (I) resembles that of the VOF3 structure, (III) (Supel et al., 2007), with both forming a layer comprised of corner- and edge-sharing o­cta­hedral units bridged via fluoride ligands (Fig. 3b). Aside from the different vanadium oxidation states, there are a number of significant differences between these two structures. The presence of uncoordinated water molecules in (I) results in longer inter-layer V···V distances, due to the hydrogen bonding from atom O3 to the layer [O3···H2 = 1.86 (4) Å and H2—O2 = 0.86 (4) Å], compared to those in (III) (Table 4). The elongated trans-fluoride ligand, F1, in (I) is involved in the edge-sharing V—F bonds, while in (III), the equivalent ligand is involved in the corner-sharing V—F bond. This results in a significant difference in the intra-layer V···V distances (Table 4). The layers of (I) can be seen to stack in a `staggered" manner (Fig. 4a.), while the layers in (III) stack in an `eclispsed' manner (Fig. 4b) when both are viewed along [010]. There are many previous examples of layered V4+-containing compounds that have synthesized solvothermally (Nguyen et al., 1995; Massa et al., 2002); however, these compounds owe their two-dimensional structural properties to phosphate and sulfate linkers. More recently, there have been examples of V4+-containing layers, synthesized via ionothermal methods (Aidoudi et al., 2011a,b, 2014). These compounds exhibit two-dimensional layers comprised fully of V4+ corner-sharing o­cta­hedral units. This appears to make compound (I) the first example of a purely V4+ layered compound produced via solvothermal techniques. From the presented synthesis route, compound (I) appears as a minor phase, together with a majority unidentified phase(s). Several further attempts to prepare (I) as the majority phase were unsuccessful. The synthetic method will need to be refined in order to produce (I) as the bulk phase, but this could lead to a simpler more cost-effective route, compared to ionothermal techniques, to obtain layered V4+ compounds for physical property investigation.

Synthesis and crystallization top

Vanadium trifluoride (VF3, Alfa, 98%; 0.002 mol, 0.215 g) and ethyl­ene glycol (Fisher 99%+; 0.0032 mol, 0.2 ml) were added to a 40% solution of HF (0.5 ml, Alfa). Di­ethyl­amine [guanidine carbonate salt (0.001 mol, 0.09 g) was used in a different experiment in place of di­ethyl­amine and produced similar results] (Sigma, 99.5%; 0.001 mol, 0.5 ml) and selenious acid (Aldrich 99.999%; 0.001 mol, 0.129 g) were added to the resultant mixture before being sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. This was heated at 393 K for 4 d, then allowed to cool to ambient temperature. The final product was filtered, washed in water and allowed to dry overnight at 333 K. The crystals obtained were blue blocks, indicating V4+, of typical dimension 0.06 × 0.04 × 0.03 mm. These were separated from the bulk product, a brown powder, under an optical microscope. The crystals recovered were too scarce to be analysed using powder X-ray diffraction or to be sent for elemental analysis.

Refinement details top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. H atoms were located from Fourier maps and refined isotropically.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The crystal packing of (I), viewed along the [010] direction.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The building unit of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) -x + 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 1; (ii) -x + 1/2, y + 1/2, -z + 3/2.]
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. (a) The layer of (I) along [100] and (b) the layer of (III) along [100]. By comparison with part (a), the same corner and edge-sharing configuration can be seen, with a terminal cis-water and fluoride ligand in (I) and (III), respectively.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. (a) Polyhedral representation of (I), viewed along [010], perpendicular to the layers. (b) Polyhedral representation of (III), viewed along [010]. Note the differences in layer stacking, mediated by the presence of inter-layer water molecules in (I).
Diaquatetra-µ-fluorido-dioxidodivanadium(IV) monohydrate top
Crystal data top
V2O2F4(H2O)2·H2OF(000) = 512
Mr = 263.93Dx = 2.638 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C2ycCell parameters from 1673 reflections
a = 14.453 (8) Åθ = 3.5–28.9°
b = 4.8879 (19) ŵ = 2.87 mm1
c = 9.663 (5) ÅT = 173 K
β = 103.24 (2)°Block, blue
V = 664.5 (6) Å30.06 × 0.04 × 0.03 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Rigaku SCXmini
diffractometer
585 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.115
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.3°, θmin = 2.9°
dtprofit.ref scansh = 1818
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(REQAB; Rigaku, 1998)
k = 66
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 1.000l = 1212
3138 measured reflections1080 standard reflections every 1 reflections
750 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.071All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.01 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0095P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
750 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.030
63 parametersΔρmax = 0.56 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.67 e Å3
Crystal data top
V2O2F4(H2O)2·H2OV = 664.5 (6) Å3
Mr = 263.93Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 14.453 (8) ŵ = 2.87 mm1
b = 4.8879 (19) ÅT = 173 K
c = 9.663 (5) Å0.06 × 0.04 × 0.03 mm
β = 103.24 (2)°
Data collection top
Rigaku SCXmini
diffractometer
750 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(REQAB; Rigaku, 1998)
585 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.115
3138 measured reflections1080 standard reflections every 1 reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0350 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.071All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.01Δρmax = 0.56 e Å3
750 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.67 e Å3
63 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
V10.18501 (4)0.19656 (10)0.61917 (6)0.00822 (18)
F10.19765 (13)0.4512 (4)0.4665 (2)0.0113 (4)
F20.21071 (14)0.1169 (4)0.7467 (2)0.0125 (4)
O10.10702 (19)0.0680 (5)0.4776 (3)0.0133 (6)
O20.09784 (17)0.3392 (4)0.6657 (3)0.0136 (5)
O30.00000.1972 (8)0.25000.0137 (8)
H10.127 (3)0.201 (9)0.467 (5)0.027 (14)*
H20.070 (3)0.001 (10)0.403 (5)0.036 (14)*
H30.033 (3)0.292 (8)0.230 (6)0.037 (16)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
V10.0096 (3)0.0066 (3)0.0085 (3)0.0004 (2)0.0022 (2)0.0001 (2)
F10.0159 (11)0.0086 (9)0.0100 (10)0.0018 (7)0.0042 (9)0.0012 (8)
F20.0149 (10)0.0092 (9)0.0119 (12)0.0009 (7)0.0004 (9)0.0039 (8)
O10.0166 (14)0.0084 (13)0.0132 (15)0.0010 (11)0.0001 (11)0.0019 (12)
O20.0137 (11)0.0114 (12)0.0157 (15)0.0022 (9)0.0035 (11)0.0009 (10)
O30.0150 (18)0.0108 (17)0.015 (2)0.0000.0032 (16)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
V1—O21.592 (2)V1—O12.027 (3)
V1—F21.948 (2)V1—F1ii2.174 (2)
V1—F11.971 (2)F1—V1ii2.174 (2)
V1—F2i1.972 (2)F2—V1iii1.972 (2)
O2—V1—F2102.39 (11)F2i—V1—O1164.14 (10)
O2—V1—F198.60 (11)O2—V1—F1ii171.78 (11)
F2—V1—F1159.00 (9)F2—V1—F1ii85.83 (8)
O2—V1—F2i98.46 (11)F1—V1—F1ii73.18 (8)
F2—V1—F2i86.65 (5)F2i—V1—F1ii81.86 (9)
F1—V1—F2i90.68 (9)O1—V1—F1ii83.84 (10)
O2—V1—O196.67 (13)V1—F1—V1ii106.82 (8)
F2—V1—O185.48 (11)V1—F2—V1iii141.81 (11)
F1—V1—O191.75 (11)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (iii) x+1/2, y1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaV2O2F4(H2O)2·H2O
Mr263.93
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)14.453 (8), 4.8879 (19), 9.663 (5)
β (°) 103.24 (2)
V3)664.5 (6)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.87
Crystal size (mm)0.06 × 0.04 × 0.03
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku SCXmini
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(REQAB; Rigaku, 1998)
Tmin, Tmax0.742, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3138, 750, 585
Rint0.115
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.646
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.035, 0.071, 1.01
No. of reflections750
No. of parameters63
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.56, 0.67

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2004), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2009), WinGX (Farrugia, 2012) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Selected bond lengths (Å) for comparison between (I) and cis- and trans-(II); relevant bond lengths are also shown for (III) top
CompoundBondBond length
(I)V1O21.592 (2)
V1—F12.174 (2)
V1—O12.027 (3)
cis-(II)V2O31.641 (3)
V2—F52.084 (3)
V2—O42.035 (3)
trans-(II)V1O11.606 (3)
V1—F31.960 (2)
V1—O22.305 (3)
(III)V1O11.551 (2)
V1—F11.972 (2)
V1—F32.294 (2)
Bond-valence parameters top
AtomΣ s(ij)AtomΣ s(ij)
V13.942F20.477b
O21.676aO10.517a
F20.514bF10.276b
F10.482b
Note: s(ij) values calculated for B = 0.37. References: (a) Brown & Altermatt (1985); (b) Brese & O'Keeffe (1991).
Selected V—V distances (Å) for comparison between (I) and (III). top
CompoundV—V inter-layerV—V edge-sharedV—V corner-shared
(I)5.650 (8)3.330 (2)3.704 (5)
(III)5.070 (6)3.131 (4)3.871 (3)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds