Differences in miscible viscous fingering of finite width slices with positive or negative log-mobility ratio

M. Mishra, M. Martin, and A. De Wit
Phys. Rev. E 78, 066306 – Published 11 December 2008

Abstract

When a sample of fluid of finite size is displaced in a porous medium by another miscible fluid, viscous fingering may occur when the two fluids have different viscosities. Depending whether the sample is more or less viscous than the carrier fluid, the log-mobility ratio R [defined as R=ln(μ2μ1) where μ2 and μ1 are the viscosities of the sample and of the carrier] is respectively positive or negative. In the case of a linear displacement of a finite slice of fluid, R>0 leads to fingering of the rear interface of the sample where the less viscous carrier invades the more viscous sample. If R<0, it is on the contrary the frontal interface of the sample that develops fingers where the less viscous sample displaces the more viscous bulk solution. We investigate here numerically the differences in fingering dynamics between the positive and negative log-mobility ratio cases leading to the growth of fingers against or along the direction of the flow, respectively. To do so, we integrate Darcy’s law coupled to a convection-diffusion equation for the concentration of a solute ruling the viscosity of the finite-size sample. The statistical moments of the solute’s concentration distribution are analyzed as a function of dimensionless parameters of the problem such as the length of the slice l, the log-mobility ratio R, and the ratio between transverse and axial dispersion coefficients ϵ. We find that, on average, the mixing zones and the width of the sample broadening due to fingering are larger for negative R than for positive R. This is due to the fact that fingers travel quicker in the flow direction than against the flow. Relevance of our results are discussed for interpretation of experimental results obtained in chromatographic separation and for understanding conditions of enhanced spreading of contaminants in aquifers.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
9 More
  • Received 6 February 2008

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.066306

©2008 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

M. Mishra1, M. Martin2, and A. De Wit1

  • 1Nonlinear Physical Chemistry Unit and Center for Nonlinear Phenomena and Complex Systems, Faculté des Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), CP 231 Campus Plaine, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
  • 2Ecole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles, Laboratoire de Physique et Mécanique des Milieux Hétérogènes (PMMH, UMR 7636 CNRS, Université Paris 6, Université Paris 7), 10 rue Vauquelin, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 78, Iss. 6 — December 2008

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×