Reply to “Comment on ‘Nonidentical protons' ”

T. Mart and A. Sulaksono
Phys. Rev. C 93, 039802 – Published 29 March 2016

Abstract

We reply to the Comment by Arrington, which concerns the proton radius extracted from the elastic electron-proton scattering data by using the assumption of nonidentical protons. We agree that the extracted radius should be 0.853 fm. We briefly point out the corresponding consequence in the result of our original paper.

  • Received 31 July 2015
  • Revised 29 February 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039802

©2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Research Areas
  1. Physical Systems
  1. Properties
Nuclear PhysicsParticles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

T. Mart and A. Sulaksono

  • Departemen Fisika, FMIPA, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia

Comments & Replies

Comment on “Nonidentical protons”

J. Arrington
Phys. Rev. C 93, 039801 (2016)

Comment on “Nonidentical protons”

E. J. Downie, W. J. Briscoe, R. Gilman, and G. Ron
Phys. Rev. C 88, 059801 (2013)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Original Article

Nonidentical protons

T. Mart and A. Sulaksono
Phys. Rev. C 87, 025807 (2013)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 93, Iss. 3 — March 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×