Dielectric, infrared, and Raman response of undoped SrTiO3 ceramics: Evidence of polar grain boundaries

J. Petzelt, T. Ostapchuk, I. Gregora, I. Rychetský, S. Hoffmann-Eifert, A. V. Pronin, Y. Yuzyuk, B. P. Gorshunov, S. Kamba, V. Bovtun, J. Pokorný, M. Savinov, V. Porokhonskyy, D. Rafaja, P. Vaněk, A. Almeida, M. R. Chaves, A. A. Volkov, M. Dressel, and R. Waser
Phys. Rev. B 64, 184111 – Published 22 October 2001
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Thorough Raman and infrared (IR) reflectivity investigations of nominally pure SrTiO3 ceramics in the 10–300 K range have revealed a clear presence of the polar phase whose manifestation steeply increases on cooling. The Raman strengths of the Raman-forbidden IR modes are proportional to ωTO1α(α1.6) where ωTO1 is the polar soft mode frequency. No pronounced permittivity dispersion is observed below the soft mode frequency so that, as in single crystals, the static permittivity is essentially determined by the soft mode contribution. A theory is suggested which assumes a frozen dipole moment connected with the grain boundaries which induces the polar phase in the grain bulk in correlation with the bulk soft-mode frequency. This stiffens slightly the effective soft mode response and reduces the low-temperature permittivity compared to that of single crystals. Moreover, the polar soft mode strongly couples to the Eg component of the structural soft doublet showing that the polar axis is perpendicular to the tetragonal axis below the structural transition which is shifted to 132 K in our ceramics. Whereas the TiO6 octahedra tilt (primary order parameter) below the structural transition corresponds to that in single crystals, much smaller A1gEg splitting of the structural soft doublet shows that the tetragonal deformation (secondary order parameter) is nearly 10 times smaller, apparently due to the grain volume clamping in ceramics.

  • Received 5 June 2001

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.184111

©2001 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. Petzelt1, T. Ostapchuk1, I. Gregora1, I. Rychetský1, S. Hoffmann-Eifert2, A. V. Pronin5, Y. Yuzyuk4,*, B. P. Gorshunov3,5, S. Kamba1, V. Bovtun1, J. Pokorný1, M. Savinov1, V. Porokhonskyy1, D. Rafaja6, P. Vaněk1, A. Almeida4, M. R. Chaves4, A. A. Volkov5, M. Dressel3, and R. Waser2

  • 1Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Slovance 2, 18221 Prague 8, Czech Republic
  • 2Institut f. Festkörperforschung Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 3Physikalisches Institut, Universität Stuttgart, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany
  • 4Departamento de Fisica, IFIMUP, Faculdade de Ciencias da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007, Portugal
  • 5Institute of General Physics, RAS, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
  • 6Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 3, 121 16 Praha 2, Czech Republic

  • *Present address: Faculty of Physics, Rostov State University, Zorge 5, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 64, Iss. 18 — 1 November 2001

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×