Quantum percolation of monopole paths and the response of quantum spin ice

Matthew Stern, Claudio Castelnovo, Roderich Moessner, Vadim Oganesyan, and Sarang Gopalakrishnan
Phys. Rev. B 104, 115114 – Published 7 September 2021

Abstract

We consider quantum spin ice in a temperature regime in which its response is dominated by the coherent motion of a dilute gas of monopoles through an incoherent spin background, taken to be quasistatic on the relevant timescales. The latter introduces well-known blocked directions that we find sufficient to reduce the coherent propagation of monopoles to quantum diffusion. This result is robust against disorder, as a direct consequence of the ground-state degeneracy, which disrupts the quantum interference processes needed for weak localization. Moreover, recent work [Tomasello et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 067204 (2019)] has shown that the monopole hopping amplitudes are roughly bimodal: for 1/3 of the flippable spins surrounding a monopole, these amplitudes are extremely small. We exploit this structure to construct a theory of quantum monopole motion in spin ice. In the limit where the slow hopping terms are set to zero, the monopole wave functions appear to be fractal; we explain this observation via mapping to quantum percolation on trees. The fractal, nonergodic nature of monopole wave functions manifests itself in the low-frequency behavior of monopole spectral functions, and is consistent with experimental observations.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 28 June 2020
  • Revised 25 July 2021
  • Accepted 25 August 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.115114

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Matthew Stern1,2, Claudio Castelnovo3, Roderich Moessner4, Vadim Oganesyan2,5, and Sarang Gopalakrishnan2,5,6

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11790, USA
  • 2Initiative for the Theoretical Sciences, Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York 10016, USA
  • 3TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
  • 4Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme, 01187 Dresden, Germany
  • 5Department of Engineering Science and Physics, College of Staten Island, Staten Island, New York 10314, USA
  • 6Department of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 11 — 15 September 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×