• Editors' Suggestion

Quasi-four-component method with numeric atom-centered orbitals for relativistic density functional simulations of molecules and solids

Rundong Zhao, Victor Wen-zhe Yu, Kimberly Zhang, Yunlong Xiao, Yong Zhang, and Volker Blum
Phys. Rev. B 103, 245144 – Published 28 June 2021

Abstract

We describe and benchmark the quasi-four-component (Q4C) approach to relativistic density functional simulations of molecules and solids, using precise, numerically tabulated atom-centered orbital (NAO) basis sets to discretize Dirac's equation. The Q4C approach initially projects the atomic solution to (electron-only) positive-energy states and eventually deals with only two components but retains the precision of traditional four-component (4C) relativistic methods. While Q4C inherently reduces the dimension of the Hamiltonian matrix in diagonalization, the adoption of localized NAO basis functions in solids further limits the computational demand in real space operations, promising a pathway to investigate large and complex systems containing heavy elements with the precision of a 4C method. Here, we first perform validation and benchmark calculations for cohesive properties of a set of diatomic molecules and of previously established periodic model systems (i.e., silver halides). Then we report Q4C relativistic energy band structure benchmarks for a series of 103 periodic materials, including chemical elements up to Bi, and providing quantitative comparisons with more approximate scalar-relativistic and spin-orbit coupled treatments. Finally, we demonstrate the applicability of the method to band structure calculations of simple and complex hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites containing Pb and Bi, i.e., Cs2AgBiCl6 and a larger system (containing 94 atoms per unit cell), (4FPEA)2PbI4. The effect of full Q4C, compared with scalar relativity, on binding energies can be significant even for relatively light p-orbital bonded main group elements such as Br and I—i.e., 0.3 and 0.6 eV for Br2 and I2 binding energies, respectively.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 9 February 2021
  • Revised 1 June 2021
  • Accepted 8 June 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.245144

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Rundong Zhao1,2,*, Victor Wen-zhe Yu1, Kimberly Zhang3, Yunlong Xiao4, Yong Zhang5, and Volker Blum1,†

  • 1Thomas Lord Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 2School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 3Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
  • 4College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 5Qingdao Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China

  • *Corresponding author: rdzhao@buaa.edu.cn
  • Corresponding author: volker.blum@duke.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 24 — 15 June 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×