Secondary Tail Formation and Breakup in Piezoacoustic Inkjet Printing: Femtoliter Droplets Captured in Flight

Arjan Fraters, Roger Jeurissen, Marc van den Berg, Hans Reinten, Herman Wijshoff, Detlef Lohse, Michel Versluis, and Tim Segers
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 024075 – Published 27 February 2020

Abstract

The role of meniscus motion and ink viscosity in the formation of a secondary tail and its breakup are studied experimentally during the picoliter-droplet formation process of a MEMS piezoacoustic inkjet print head using laser-induced 8-ns single-flash stroboscopic imaging with a temporal resolution of 100 ns. It is found that the formation of the secondary tail is driven by meniscus motion and that the secondary tail forms reproducibly between the primary tail and the meniscus in the final microseconds before pinchoff. We demonstrate that the stability of the secondary tail can be controlled through the motion of the meniscus after the primary tail has formed. A 4 times increase in stretching rate results in a 2.2 times increase in the secondary-tail length and a 3 times higher number of femtoliter satellites. Furthermore, as expected for Rayleigh breakup, a 43% increase in ink viscosity is found to increase the secondary-tail length by 50%. Finally, it is found that, during inkjet printing, the secondary tail cascades into tertiary and quaternary tails. We show that the formation of higher-order tails is irreproducible and therefore driven by noise. The formation of thicker secondary and thinner higher-order tails results in a bimodal satellite size distribution, where the secondary satellites with a volume greater than or equal to 4fL are located closer to the primary-tail droplet, while satellites with a volume less than 4fL are located closer to the nozzle. The main findings of the present work, that the stability of the secondary tail decreases with a decrease in stretching rate and ink viscosity, can be employed in the inkjet-printing community for waveform design to minimize internal contamination of inkjet printers.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 4 December 2018
  • Revised 27 November 2019
  • Accepted 22 January 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.024075

© 2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Arjan Fraters1, Roger Jeurissen2, Marc van den Berg3, Hans Reinten3, Herman Wijshoff3,4, Detlef Lohse1, Michel Versluis1, and Tim Segers1,*

  • 1Physics of Fluids Group, Max-Planck Center Twente for Complex Fluid Dynamics, Department of Science and Technology, MESA+ Institute, and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
  • 2Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • 3Océ Technologies B.V., P.O. Box 101, 5900 MA Venlo, Netherlands
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands

  • *t.j.segers@utwente.nl

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 13, Iss. 2 — February 2020

Subject Areas
Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Applied

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×