Optimization of K-shell emission in aluminum z-pinch implosions: Theory versus experiment

K. G. Whitney, J. W. Thornhill, J. L. Giuliani, Jr., J. Davis, L. A. Miles, E. E. Nolting, V. L. Kenyon, W. A. Speicer, J. A. Draper, C. R. Parsons, P. Dang, R. B. Spielman, T. J. Nash, J. S. McGurn, L. E. Ruggles, C. Deeney, R. R. Prasad, and L. Warren
Phys. Rev. E 50, 2166 – Published 1 September 1994
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Two sets of z-pinch experiments were recently completed at the Saturn and Phoenix facilities of Sandia National Laboratories and the Naval Surface Warfare Center, respectively, using aluminum wire arrays of different wire and array diameters. Measurements of the total x-ray yield from the K shell of aluminum were made. In this paper, a comparison of these measurements is made to both theoretical predictions and to a similar set of earlier measurements that were made at the Double Eagle facility of Physics International Company. These three sets of yield measurements have points of agreement with predicted yields and with each other, but they also show points of mutual disagreement, whose significance is discussed. The data are analyzed using a slightly revised version of a previously published K-shell yield scaling law, and they support the existence of a reasonably well defined region in (load mass)–(implosion velocity) space in which plasma kinetic energy is efficiently converted into K-shell x rays. Furthermore, a correlation is observed between the inferred conversion efficiencies and the times in which the implosions occur relative to the times when each generator’s short-circuit current reaches its peak value. Finally, unlike the Double Eagle experiments, the largest measured yields in the new experiments were observed to occur at the upper velocity boundary of the efficient emission region. Moreover, the observed yields are in fairly good quantitative agreement with an earlier scaling law prediction of the maximum K-shell x-ray yield from aluminum as a function of load mass assuming kinetic energy conversion alone.

  • Received 25 March 1994

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.2166

©1994 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

K. G. Whitney, J. W. Thornhill, J. L. Giuliani, Jr., and J. Davis

  • Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375

L. A. Miles, E. E. Nolting, V. L. Kenyon, W. A. Speicer, J. A. Draper, C. R. Parsons, and P. Dang

  • Naval Surface Warfare Center, White Oak, Silver Spring, Maryland 20903

R. B. Spielman, T. J. Nash, J. S. McGurn, and L. E. Ruggles

  • Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185

C. Deeney, R. R. Prasad, and L. Warren

  • Physics International Co., San Leandro, California 94577

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 50, Iss. 3 — September 1994

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×