Ribosome exit tunnel electrostatics

Marc Joiret, Frederic Kerff, Francesca Rapino, Pierre Close, and Liesbet Geris
Phys. Rev. E 105, 014409 – Published 13 January 2022

Abstract

The impact of ribosome exit tunnel electrostatics on the protein elongation rate or on forces acting upon the nascent polypeptide chain are currently not fully elucidated. In the past, researchers have measured the electrostatic potential inside the ribosome polypeptide exit tunnel at a limited number of spatial points, at least in rabbit reticulocytes. Here we present a basic electrostatic model of the exit tunnel of the ribosome, providing a quantitative physical description of the tunnel interaction with the nascent proteins at all centro-axial points inside the tunnel. We show that a strong electrostatic screening is due to water molecules (not mobile ions) attracted to the ribosomal nucleic acid phosphate moieties buried in the immediate vicinity of the tunnel wall. We also show how the tunnel wall components and local ribosomal protein protrusions impact on the electrostatic potential profile and impede charged amino acid residues from progressing through the tunnel, affecting the elongation rate in a range of 40% to +85% when compared to the average elongation rate. The time spent by the ribosome to decode the genetic encrypted message is constrained accordingly. We quantitatively derive, at single-residue resolution, the axial forces acting on the nascent peptide from its particular sequence embedded in the tunnel. The model sheds light on how the experimental data point measurements of the potential are linked to the local structural chemistry of the inner wall, shape, and size of the tunnel. The model consistently connects experimental observations coming from different fields in molecular biology, x-ray crystallography, physical chemistry, biomechanics, and synthetic and multiomics biology. Our model should be a valuable tool to gain insight into protein synthesis dynamics, translational control, and the role of the ribosome's mechanochemistry in the cotranslational protein folding.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
8 More
  • Received 22 October 2020
  • Revised 8 September 2021
  • Accepted 8 December 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.014409

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Physics of Living SystemsAtomic, Molecular & OpticalInterdisciplinary PhysicsStatistical Physics & Thermodynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Marc Joiret1,*, Frederic Kerff2, Francesca Rapino3, Pierre Close3, and Liesbet Geris1,4,5,†

  • 1Biomechanics Research Unit, GIGA In Silico Medicine, Liège University, CHU-B34(+5) 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, 4000 Liège, Belgium
  • 2UR InBios, Centre d'Ingénierie des Protéines, Bât B6a, Allée du 6 Août, 19, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
  • 3Cancer Signaling, GIGA Stem Cells, CHU-B34(+2) 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
  • 4Skeletal Biology & Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, ON I Herestraat 49 - box 813, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
  • 5Biomechanics Section, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300C box 2419, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium

  • *marc.joiret@uliege.be
  • liesbet.geris@uliege.be

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 1 — January 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×