Post-LHC7 fine-tuning in the minimal supergravity/CMSSM model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson

Howard Baer, Vernon Barger, Peisi Huang, Dan Mickelson, Azar Mustafayev, and Xerxes Tata
Phys. Rev. D 87, 035017 – Published 13 February 2013

Abstract

The recent discovery of a 125 GeV Higgs-like resonance at LHC, coupled with the lack of evidence for weak scale supersymmetry (SUSY), has severely constrained SUSY models such as minimal supergravity (mSUGRA)/CMSSM. As LHC probes deeper into SUSY model parameter space, the little hierarchy problem—how to reconcile the Z and Higgs boson mass scale with the scale of SUSY breaking—will become increasingly exacerbated unless a sparticle signal is found. We evaluate two different measures of fine-tuning in the mSUGRA/CMSSM model. The more stringent of these, ΔHS, includes effects that arise from the high-scale origin of the mSUGRA parameters while the second measure, ΔEW, is determined only by weak scale parameters: hence, it is universal to any model with the same particle spectrum and couplings. Our results incorporate the latest constraints from LHC7 sparticle searches, LHCb limits from Bsμ+μ and also require a light Higgs scalar with mh123127GeV. We present fine-tuning contours in the m0 vs m1/2 plane for several sets of A0 and tanβ values. We also present results for ΔHS and ΔEW from a scan over the entire viable model parameter space. We find a ΔHS103, or at best 0.1%, fine-tuning. For the less stringent electroweak fine-tuning, we find ΔEW102, or at best 1%, fine-tuning. Two benchmark points are presented that have the lowest values of ΔHS and ΔEW. Our results provide a quantitative measure for ascertaining whether or not the remaining mSUGRA/CMSSM model parameter space is excessively fine-tuned and so could provide impetus for considering alternative SUSY models.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 26 October 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.035017

© 2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Howard Baer1,*, Vernon Barger2,†, Peisi Huang2,‡, Dan Mickelson1,§, Azar Mustafayev3,∥, and Xerxes Tata3,¶

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA

  • *baer@nhn.ou.edu
  • barger@pheno.wisc.edu
  • phuang7@wisc.edu
  • §dsmickelson@ou.edu
  • azar@phys.hawaii.edu
  • tata@phys.hawaii.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 3 — 1 February 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×