Finite-temperature calculation of the isovector giant dipole resonance in Sn120 using self-consistent inputs

Sujan Kumar Roy, Chandrani Sen, Supriya Mukhopadhyay, and Jhilam Sadhukhan
Phys. Rev. C 106, 034303 – Published 9 September 2022

Abstract

Background: Although microscopic models are frequently used to investigate giant resonances built on the ground state of a nucleus, similar calculations at nonzero temperature are limited. Approaches based on the classical thermal shape-fluctuation model (TSFM) are often utilized to analyze the properties of giant dipole resonance at finite temperature. However, TSFM fails to predict the correct trend of resonance width over a wide range of temperature starting from zero.

Purpose: To study the isovector giant dipole resonance (IVGDR) at finite temperature, we present an improved version of TSFM, where driving potential and IVGDR centroid energies are obtained self-consistently using the nuclear energy density functional formalism. The temperature dependence of IVGDR width in Sn120 is calculated to benchmark the proposed method.

Method: Nuclear free energy surfaces and entropy surfaces are simulated at different temperatures for two different parametrizations of Skyrme energy density functionals. Moreover, IVGDR centroid energies are calculated by incorporating nuclear deformations extracted from the corresponding self-consistent densities. Subsequently, IVGDR widths are obtained within TSFM. Also, we demonstrate the role of pairing fluctuation in improving the low temperature behavior of IVGDR width.

Result: We found good overall agreement of our results with the measured IVGDR widths. Specifically, except at a very low temperature, unprecedented accuracy has been achieved in TSFM. Calculated IVGDR widths are shown to be robust against the choices of driving potential and Skyrme parametrization.

Conclusion: The present paper provides guidance on using TSFM based calculations in predicting the IVGDR width over a broad range of temperature. For a more consistent calculation, pairing fluctuations are required to be included as additional degrees of freedom.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 1 March 2022
  • Revised 11 July 2022
  • Accepted 29 August 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.034303

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Sujan Kumar Roy, Chandrani Sen, Supriya Mukhopadhyay, and Jhilam Sadhukhan

  • Physics Group, Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata 700064, India and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 3 — September 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×