Influence of the treatment of initialization and mean-field potential on the neutron to proton yield ratios

Junping Yang, Yingxun Zhang, Ning Wang, and Zhuxia Li
Phys. Rev. C 104, 024605 – Published 6 August 2021

Abstract

In this work, we first investigate how to reproduce and how well one can reproduce the Woods-Saxon density distribution of initial nuclei in the framework of the improved quantum molecular dynamics model. Then, we propose a new treatment for the initialization of nuclei which is correlated with the nucleonic mean-field potential by using the same potential energy density functional. In the mean field potential, the three-body force term is accurately calculated. Based on the new version of the model, the influences of precise calculations of the three-body force term, the slope of symmetry energy, the neutron-proton effective mass splitting, and the width of the wave packet on heavy ion collision observables, such as the neutron to proton yield ratios for emitted free nucleons [R(n/p)] and for coalescence invariant nucleons [Rci(n/p)] for Sn124+Sn112 at the beam energy of 200 MeV per nucleon, are discussed. Our calculations show that the spectra of neutron to proton yield ratios [R(n/p)] can be used to probe the slope of symmetry energy (L) and the neutron-proton effective mass splitting. In detail, the R(n/p) in the low kinetic energy region can be used to probe the slope of symmetry energy (L). With a given L, the inclination of R(n/p) to kinetic energy (Ek) can be used to probe the effective mass splitting. In the case where the neutron-proton effective mass splitting is fixed, R(n/p) at high kinetic energy can also be used to learn the symmetry energy at suprasaturation density.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 24 March 2021
  • Revised 20 June 2021
  • Accepted 23 July 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024605

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Junping Yang1,3, Yingxun Zhang1,2,*, Ning Wang2,3, and Zhuxia Li1

  • 1China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China
  • 2Guangxi Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
  • 3Department of Physics, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China

  • *zhyx@ciae.ac.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 2 — August 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×