Angle-resolved photoemission and quasiparticle calculation of ZnO: The need for d band shift in oxide semiconductors

Linda Y. Lim, Stephan Lany, Young Jun Chang, Eli Rotenberg, Alex Zunger, and Michael F. Toney
Phys. Rev. B 86, 235113 – Published 11 December 2012
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

ZnO is a prototypical semiconductor with occupied d10 bands that interact with the anion p states and is thus challenging for electronic structure theories. Within the context of these theories, incomplete cancellation of the self-interaction energy results in a Zn d band that is too high in energy, resulting in upwards repulsion of the valence band maximum (VBM) states, and an unphysical reduction of the band gap. Methods such as GW should significantly reduce the self-interaction error, and in order to evaluate such calculations, we measured high-resolution and resonant angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and compared these to several electronic structure calculations. We find that, in a standard GW calculation, the d bands remain too high in energy by more than 1 eV irrespective of the Hamiltonian used for generating the input wave functions, causing a slight underestimation of the band gap due to the pd repulsion. We show that a good agreement with the ARPES data over the full valence band spectrum is obtained, when the Zn-d band energy is shifted down by applying an on-site potential Vd for Zn-d states during the GW calculations to match the measured d band position. The magnitude of the GW quasiparticle energy shift relative to the initial density functional calculation is of importance for the prediction of charged defect formation energies, band-offsets, and ionization potentials.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 19 September 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.235113

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Linda Y. Lim1,2, Stephan Lany3, Young Jun Chang4, Eli Rotenberg5, Alex Zunger6, and Michael F. Toney2

  • 1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • 2Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
  • 3National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, University of Seoul, Seoul 130-743, Korea
  • 5Advanced Light Source, E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 6University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 86, Iss. 23 — 15 December 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×