Phase diagram of the orthorhombic, lightly lutetium doped EuMnO3 magnetoelectric system

J. Oliveira, J. Agostinho Moreira, A. Almeida, M. R. Chaves, J. M. M. da Silva, J. B. Oliveira, M. A. Sá, P. B. Tavares, R. Ranjith, and W. Prellier
Phys. Rev. B 84, 094414 – Published 15 September 2011

Abstract

This paper reports on structural, magnetic, dielectric, thermodynamic, and magnetodielectric properties of Eu1xLuxMnO3, with 0 ⩽ x ⩽ 0.2, towards the (x, T) phase diagram. The phase diagram reflects the effect of lattice distortions induced by the isovalent substitution of Eu3+ by smaller Lu3+ ions, which gradually unbalances the antiferromagnetic against the ferromagnetic exchange interactions, enabling the emergence of both ferroelectricity and magnetoelectric coupling. For x < 0.1, the paramagnetic phase is followed by a presumably incommensurate collinear antiferromagnetic phase AFM-1, and then a weak ferromagnetic phase seems to be established, with a canted A-type antiferromagnetic order. For 0.1 ⩽ x ⩽ 0.2, the AFM-1 phase is followed by an antiferromagnetic phase AFM-2 with modulated spiral spin arrangement, compatible with ferroelectricity. The disappearance of hysteresis cycles P(E) at low temperatures, clearly indicates the existence of an antiferromagnetic phase AFM-3, whose spin structure is not compatible with both the ferroelectric and ferromagnetic components. The magnetic behavior of EuMnO3 and Eu0.9Lu0.1MnO3 suggests the existence of a phase line separating the AFM-1 phase from the AFM-2 and AFM-3 phases, which is observed for x = 0.1. Magnetodielectric coupling was evidenced for both x = 0.1 and 0.2 compositions. Ferroelectric polarization and magnetodielectric coupling coefficient are larger for the latter composition.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 31 May 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.094414

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. Oliveira1, J. Agostinho Moreira1,*, A. Almeida1, M. R. Chaves1, J. M. M. da Silva1, J. B. Oliveira1, M. A. Sá1, P. B. Tavares2, R. Ranjith3, and W. Prellier3

  • 1IFIMUP and IN-Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Departamento de Física e Astronomia da Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.
  • 2Centro de Química. Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Apartado 1013, 5001-801. Vila Real, Portugal.
  • 3Laboratoire CRISMAT, CNRS UMR 6508, ENSICAEN, 6 Boulevard du Maréchal Juin, F-14050 Caen Cedex, France.

  • *jamoreir@fc.up.pt

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 84, Iss. 9 — 1 September 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×