Growth of praseodymium oxide on Si(111) under oxygen-deficient conditions

A. Schaefer, V. Zielasek, Th. Schmidt, A. Sandell, M. Schowalter, O. Seifarth, L. E. Walle, Ch. Schulz, J. Wollschläger, T. Schroeder, A. Rosenauer, J. Falta, and M. Bäumer
Phys. Rev. B 80, 045414 – Published 15 July 2009

Abstract

Surface science studies of thin praseodymium oxide films grown on silicon substrates are of high interest in view of applications in such different fields as microelectronics and heterogeneous catalysis. In particular, a detailed characterization of the growth and the final structure of the films are mandatory to achieve a fundamental understanding of such topics as oxygen mobility and defect structure, and their role for the electronic and chemical properties. In this paper, the MBE growth of praseodymium oxide films on Si(111) substrates was investigated at low-deposition rates (0.06 nm/min) and low-oxygen partial pressures (p(O2)<1×1010mbar). To obtain insight into the structure and chemical composition of the growing film, spot profile analyzing low-energy electron diffraction (SPA-LEED), transmission electron microscopy, and synchrotron radiation-based x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) were applied. SPA-LEED reveals the formation of an initial closed layer followed by continuous roughening and formation of ordered three-dimensional structures. This result is in contrast to observations at higher-deposition rates, were a layer-by-layer growth was reported. XAS and XPS provide evidence that a continuous reaction takes place in the growing Pr2O3 film leading to the formation of silicate and silicide structures within the film. Combining all data, a consistent picture of the deposition of praseodymium oxide on Si(111) emerges which clearly shows that in contrast to higher-throughput molecular beam epitaxy conditions the reactivity of the growing film strongly influences the growth behavior at low-deposition rates and low pressures.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 5 February 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.045414

©2009 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. Schaefer1,2, V. Zielasek1, Th. Schmidt2, A. Sandell3, M. Schowalter2, O. Seifarth4, L. E. Walle5, Ch. Schulz2, J. Wollschläger6, T. Schroeder4, A. Rosenauer2, J. Falta2, and M. Bäumer1,*

  • 1Institute of Applied and Physical Chemistry, University of Bremen, Leobener Str. NW2, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
  • 2Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Bremen, P.O. Box 330440, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
  • 3Department of Physics and Materials Science, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 530, SE-75121 Uppsala, Sweden
  • 4IHP, Im Technologiepark 25, D-15236 Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
  • 5Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
  • 6Department of Physics, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastrasse 7, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany

  • *Corresponding author. mbaeumer@uni-bremen.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 80, Iss. 4 — 15 July 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×