Role of L-shell single and double core-hole production and decay in m-fold (1m6) photoionization of the Ar+ ion

A. Müller, M. Martins, A. Borovik, Jr., T. Buhr, A. Perry-Sassmannshausen, S. Reinwardt, F. Trinter, S. Schippers, S. Fritzsche, and A. S. Kheifets
Phys. Rev. A 104, 033105 – Published 9 September 2021

Abstract

Multiple ionization of the Ar+(3s23p5) ion by a single photon has been investigated in the photon-energy range 250–1800 eV employing the photon-ion merged-beams technique. Absolute partial cross sections were measured for all Ar(1+m)+ product-ion channels with 1m6 covering a size range from several tens of Mb down to a few b. Narrow 2p-subshell excitation resonances were observed in all channels up to quadruple ionization at a photon-energy bandwidth of 52 meV. Double excitations involving a 2p and a 3s or 3p electron were also studied at high resolution and the measurements of the broad 2s excitation resonances directly showed their natural widths. Contributions of direct photo double ionization (PDI) to the production of the highest final Ar ion charge states are revealed, with PDI of the 2s subshell being mainly responsible for the production of Ar7+. The experiment made use of the PIPE setup installed at beamline P04 of the PETRA III synchrotron light source of DESY in Hamburg. The measurements were supported by theoretical calculations to identify the main contributions to the observed cross sections. Comparisons of theory and experiment show remarkable agreement but also hint to additional ionization mechanisms that are not considered in the theoretical models such as core ionization accompanied by excitations with subsequent Auger decays leading to net m-fold ionization with m4.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
11 More
  • Received 25 July 2021
  • Accepted 25 August 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.033105

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

A. Müller1,*, M. Martins2, A. Borovik, Jr.3, T. Buhr3, A. Perry-Sassmannshausen3, S. Reinwardt2, F. Trinter4,5, S. Schippers3, S. Fritzsche6,7, and A. S. Kheifets8

  • 1Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
  • 2Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
  • 3I. Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
  • 4Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 5Molecular Physics, Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, 14195 Berlin, Germany
  • 6Helmholtz-Institut Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
  • 7Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
  • 8Research School of Physics, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia

  • *Alfred.Mueller@iamp.physik.uni-giessen.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 3 — September 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×