Determination of the isotopic change in nuclear charge radius from extreme-ultraviolet spectroscopy of highly charged ions of Xe

R. Silwal, A. Lapierre, J. D. Gillaspy, J. M. Dreiling, S. A. Blundell, Dipti, A. Borovik, Jr., G. Gwinner, A. C. C. Villari, Yu. Ralchenko, and E. Takacs
Phys. Rev. A 101, 062512 – Published 16 June 2020

Abstract

The electron-beam ion trap (EBIT) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was employed for the measurement and detailed analysis of the δλ(Xe124,Xe136) isotopic shifts of the Al-like 3s23pP1/223s23pP3/22, Al-like 3s23pP1/223s23dD3/22, Mg-like 3s2S013s3pP11, Mg-like 3s2S013s3pP13, Na-like 3sS1/223pP1/22 (D1), and Na-like 3sS1/223pP3/22 (D2) transitions. Systematic analysis revealed possible line blends and contributing experimental uncertainties. Highly accurate atomic-structure calculations were conducted and used to determine the δr2136,124 difference in the mean-square nuclear charge radii of the two xenon isotopes. In the present work, δr2136,124 of 0.276 ± 0.030 fm2 was obtained from the weighted average of the Na-like D1, Mg-like 3s23s3p and Al-like 3s23p3s23p and 3s23p3s23d transitions. This result confirms the value previously determined from the Na-like D1 transition of 0.269 ± 0.042 fm2. The uncertainty of our result is half of that of previous results for the same isotopes obtained from x-ray spectroscopy of muonic atoms, laser spectroscopy of neutral xenon atoms, and a global evaluation of charge radii. Our result is slightly outside the uncertainty of the value obtained from a King plot analysis of comparable precision. The present work illustrates that extreme-ultraviolet spectroscopy of highly charged ions is a viable approach for measurements of charge nuclear radii differences and can be used to benchmark conventional methods.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 11 March 2020
  • Accepted 22 May 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.062512

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

R. Silwal1,2,*, A. Lapierre3, J. D. Gillaspy2,4, J. M. Dreiling2,†, S. A. Blundell5, Dipti2, A. Borovik, Jr.2,‡, G. Gwinner6, A. C. C. Villari3, Yu. Ralchenko2, and E. Takacs1,2

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA
  • 2National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
  • 3National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 4National Science Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, USA
  • 5Université Grenoble Alpes, CEA, CNRS, IRIG, SyMMES, 38000 Grenoble, France
  • 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2

  • *Present address: TRIUMF, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T2A3; rsilwal@triumf.ca
  • Present address: Honeywell Quantum Solutions, Broomfield, Colorado 80021, USA.
  • Present address: I. Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 6 — June 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×