Can the renormalization group improved effective potential be used to estimate the Higgs mass in the conformal limit of the standard model?

F. A. Chishtie, T. Hanif, J. Jia, R. B. Mann, D. G. C. McKeon, T. N. Sherry, and T. G. Steele
Phys. Rev. D 83, 105009 – Published 12 May 2011

Abstract

We consider the effective potential V in the standard model with a single Higgs doublet in the limit that the only mass scale μ present is radiatively generated. Using a technique that has been shown to determine V completely in terms of the renormalization group (RG) functions when using the Coleman-Weinberg renormalization scheme, we first sum leading-log (LL) contributions to V using the one loop RG functions, associated with five couplings (the top quark Yukawa coupling x, the quartic coupling of the Higgs field y, the SU(3) gauge coupling z, and the SU(2)×U(1) couplings r and s). We then employ the two loop RG functions with the three couplings x, y, z to sum the next-to-leading-log (NLL) contributions to V and then the three to five loop RG functions with one coupling y to sum all the N2LLN4LL contributions to V. In order to compute these sums, it is necessary to convert those RG functions that have been originally computed explicitly in the minimal subtraction scheme to their form in the Coleman-Weinberg scheme. The Higgs mass can then be determined from the effective potential: the LL result is mH=219GeV/c2 and decreases to mH=188GeV/c2 at N2LL order and mH=163GeV/c2 at N4LL order. No reasonable estimate of mH can be made at orders VNLL or VN3LL since the method employed gives either negative or imaginary values for the quartic scalar coupling. The fact that we get reasonable values for mH from the LL, N2LL, and N4LL approximations is taken to be an indication that this mechanism for spontaneous symmetry breaking is in fact viable, though one in which there is slow convergence towards the actual value of mH. The mass 163GeV/c2 is argued to be an upper bound on mH.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 19 December 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.105009

© 2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

F. A. Chishtie1, T. Hanif2,8, J. Jia1, R. B. Mann3, D. G. C. McKeon1,4, T. N. Sherry5,6,*, and T. G. Steele7

  • 1Department of Applied Mathematics, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
  • 4Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Algoma University, Sault St. Marie, ON N6A 2G4, Canada
  • 5School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, NUI Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
  • 6School of Theoretical Physics, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
  • 7Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
  • 8Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

  • *Corresponding author: tom.sherry@nuigalway.ie

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 83, Iss. 10 — 15 May 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×