Analytic treatment of leading-order parton evolution equations: Theory and tests

Martin M. Block, Loyal Durand, and Douglas W. McKay
Phys. Rev. D 79, 014031 – Published 28 January 2009

Abstract

We recently derived an explicit expression for the gluon distribution function G(x,Q2)=xg(x,Q2) in terms of the proton structure function F2γp(x,Q2) in leading-order (LO) QCD by solving the LO Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi equation for the Q2 evolution of F2γp(x,Q2) analytically, using a differential-equation method. We showed that accurate experimental knowledge of F2γp(x,Q2) in a region of Bjorken x and virtuality Q2 is all that is needed to determine the gluon distribution in that region. We rederive and extend the results here using a Laplace-transform technique, and show that the singlet quark structure function FS(x,Q2) can be determined directly in terms of G from the Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi gluon evolution equation. To illustrate the method and check the consistency of existing LO quark and gluon distributions, we used the published values of the LO quark distributions from the CTEQ5L and MRST2001 LO analyses to form F2γp(x,Q2), and then solved analytically for G(x,Q2). We find that the analytic and fitted gluon distributions from MRST2001LO agree well with each other for all x and Q2, while those from CTEQ5L differ significantly from each other for large x values, x0.030.05, at all Q2. We conclude that the published CTEQ5L distributions are incompatible in this region. Using a nonsinglet evolution equation, we obtain a sensitive test of quark distributions which holds in both LO and next-to-leading order perturbative QCD. We find in either case that the CTEQ5 quark distributions satisfy the tests numerically for small x, but fail the tests for x0.030.05—their use could potentially lead to significant shifts in predictions of quantities sensitive to large x. We encountered no problems with the MRST2001LO distributions or later CTEQ distributions. We suggest caution in the use of the CTEQ5 distributions.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 1 August 2008

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.014031

©2009 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Martin M. Block1, Loyal Durand2, and Douglas W. McKay3

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 79, Iss. 1 — 1 January 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×