Abstract
For closed quantum systems driven away from equilibrium, work is often defined in terms of projective measurements of initial and final energies. This definition leads to statistical distributions of work that satisfy nonequilibrium work and fluctuation relations. While this two-point measurement definition of quantum work can be justified heuristically by appeal to the first law of thermodynamics, its relationship to the classical definition of work has not been carefully examined. In this paper, we employ semiclassical methods, combined with numerical simulations of a driven quartic oscillator, to study the correspondence between classical and quantal definitions of work in systems with 1 degree of freedom. We find that a semiclassical work distribution, built from classical trajectories that connect the initial and final energies, provides an excellent approximation to the quantum work distribution when the trajectories are assigned suitable phases and are allowed to interfere. Neglecting the interferences between trajectories reduces the distribution to that of the corresponding classical process. Hence, in the semiclassical limit, the quantum work distribution converges to the classical distribution, decorated by a quantum interference pattern. We also derive the form of the quantum work distribution at the boundary between classically allowed and forbidden regions, where this distribution tunnels into the forbidden region. Our results clarify how the correspondence principle applies in the context of quantum and classical work distributions and contribute to the understanding of work and nonequilibrium work relations in the quantum regime.
2 More- Received 14 May 2015
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031038
This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.
Published by the American Physical Society
Popular Summary
Introductory physics textbooks define work as the energy required to move an object against an opposing force. Work also plays a central role in the field of thermodynamics, but the concept is notably absent from most texts on quantum mechanics. In recent years, there has been growing interest in properly defining the amount of work performed on a quantum system that is manipulated by externally applied forces. This interest is motivated both by theoretical progress describing how the laws of thermodynamics apply to small systems and by experimental advances in the control of individual atoms and molecules. Even so, defining quantum work has proven to be challenging given the strange characteristic of quantum mechanics in which the very act of observing a system can dramatically change its state.
Quantum work is often defined as the difference between the results of initial and final energy measurements. We show that this definition leads to quantum work distributions that can be understood as interference patterns between classical trajectories. In effect, if there are multiple pathways over which a classical particle can arrive at a particular final energy given an initial energy, then the quantum work includes contributions from all these paths and gives rise to patterns similar to those arising from the interference between diffracted waves. If the interference patterns are ignored, then a classical result is recovered. We additionally obtain an accurate description of the “tails” of quantum work distributions, which correspond to values of work that are classically forbidden.
Our results, which are illustrated by numerical simulations of a driven quartic oscillator, clarify the correspondence between classical and quantum work and provide intuition for the patterns observed in quantum work distributions. We expect that our findings will motivate studies of systems with additional degrees of freedom.