Optimally tuned starting point for single-shot GW calculations of solids

Stephen E. Gant, Jonah B. Haber, Marina R. Filip, Francisca Sagredo, Dahvyd Wing, Guy Ohad, Leeor Kronik, and Jeffrey B. Neaton
Phys. Rev. Materials 6, 053802 – Published 16 May 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

The dependence of ab initio many-body perturbation theory within the GW approximation on the eigensystem used in calculating quasiparticle corrections limits this method's predictive power. Here, we investigate the accuracy of the recently developed Wannier-localized optimally tuned screened range-separated hybrid (WOT-SRSH) functional as a generalized Kohn-Sham starting point for single-shot GW (G0W0) calculations for a range of semiconductors and insulators. Comparison to calculations based on well-established functionals, namely, PBE, PBE0, and HSE, as well as to self-consistent GW schemes and to experiment, shows that band gaps computed via G0W0@WOT-SRSH have a level of precision and accuracy that is comparable to that of more advanced methods such as quasiparticle self-consistent GW and eigenvalue self-consistent GW. We also find that G0W0@WOT-SRSH improves the description of states deeper in the valence band manifold. Finally, we show that G0W0@WOT-SRSH significantly reduces the sensitivity of computed band gaps to ambiguities in the underlying WOT-SRSH tuning procedure.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 28 January 2022
  • Accepted 6 April 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.053802

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsEnergy Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Stephen E. Gant1, Jonah B. Haber1, Marina R. Filip2, Francisca Sagredo1, Dahvyd Wing3, Guy Ohad3, Leeor Kronik3, and Jeffrey B. Neaton1,4,5,*

  • 1Department of Physics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford OX1 3PU, England, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Molecular Chemistry and Materials Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovoth 76100, Israel
  • 4Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 5Kavli Energy NanoScience Institute at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

  • *Corresponding author: jbneaton@lbl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 6, Iss. 5 — May 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×