Reply to “Comment on ‘Light scattering from the L3 (sponge) phase: Evidence against logarithmic corrections to ideal scaling’ ”

J. Daicic, U. Olsson, H. Wennerström, G. Jerke, and P. Schurtenberger
Phys. Rev. E 56, 1278 – Published 1 July 1997
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

We rebut the claims made by Porte et al. in their Comment by discussing how our improved control of sample composition influenced the fit to data of proposed free energy scalings for the sponge phase, and consequently how the putative logarithmic correction term to ideal scaling is indeed discounted by our data.

  • Received 18 February 1997

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.56.1278

©1997 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. Daicic1, U. Olsson2, H. Wennerström2, G. Jerke3, and P. Schurtenberger3

  • 1Department of Applied Mathematics, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territories 0200, Australia
  • 2Physical Chemistry 1, Center for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Lund, P.O. Box 124, Lund S-22100, Sweden
  • 3Institut für Polymere, Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule Zürich-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland

Comments & Replies

Original Article

Light scattering from the L3 (sponge) phase: Evidence against logarithmic corrections to ideal scaling

John Daicic, Ulf Olsson, Håkan Wennerström, Götz Jerke, and Peter Schurtenberger
Phys. Rev. E 52, 3266 (1995)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 56, Iss. 1 — July 1997

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×