Resolution of a discrepancy in the γ-ray emission probability from the β decay of Ceg137

M. S. Basunia, J. T. Morrell, M. S. Uddin, A. S. Voyles, C. D. Nesaraja, L. A. Bernstein, E. Browne, M. J. Martin, and S. M. Qaim
Phys. Rev. C 101, 064619 – Published 19 June 2020

Abstract

We have deduced the emission probability of the 447-keV γ ray from the ɛ+β+ decay of Ceg137 (9.0 h) relative to that of the 254-keV γ ray from the Cem137 (34.4 h) decay in transient equilibrium. The time-dependent factor in transient equilibrium was applied following the Bateman equation for a radioactive decay chain. The isotope was produced via the La139(p,3n)Cem,g137 reaction by bombarding natLa with a proton beam from the 88-in. cyclotron at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. γ-ray intensities were measured using an HPGe detector. The emission probability for the 447-keV γ ray deduced in this work is 1.21(3) (that is 1.21 ± 0.03) per hundred parent decays, which differs significantly from an earlier published value of 2.24(10). We identify the source of this discrepancy to be an incorrect use of the time-dependent factor. Additionally, we have deduced the emission probability of the 504-keV γ ray from the decay of Yg85 (2.68 h) relative to that of the 232-keV γ ray from the Srm85 (1.127 h) decay in transient equilibrium. The isotope was produced via the Sr86(p,2n)Yg85 reaction by bombarding SrCO386 with a proton beam at the same facility. The study confirms the assumption of the time-dependent correction for recommending the emission probability of the 504-keV γ ray in the literature. Our work highlights the importance of explicit description by authors of any time-dependent correction they have made when reporting γ-ray intensities for nuclides in transient equilibrium. The need and significance of accurate and precise decay data of Ceg137 and Yg85 in basic science and medicine is briefly outlined.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 13 September 2019
  • Revised 28 January 2020
  • Accepted 11 May 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064619

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

M. S. Basunia1, J. T. Morrell2, M. S. Uddin3, A. S. Voyles1,2, C. D. Nesaraja4, L. A. Bernstein1,2, E. Browne1, M. J. Martin4, and S. M. Qaim5

  • 1Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 2Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 3Tandem Accelerator Facilities, INST, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • 4Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 5Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin, INM-5:Nuklearchemie, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 6 — June 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×