Density-driven structural transformations in B2O3 glass

Anita Zeidler, Kamil Wezka, Dean A. J. Whittaker, Philip S. Salmon, Axelle Baroni, Stefan Klotz, Henry E. Fischer, Martin C. Wilding, Craig L. Bull, Matthew G. Tucker, Mathieu Salanne, Guillaume Ferlat, and Matthieu Micoulaut
Phys. Rev. B 90, 024206 – Published 31 July 2014

Abstract

The method of in situ high-pressure neutron diffraction is used to investigate the structure of B2O3 glass on compression in the range from ambient to 17.5(5) GPa. The experimental results are supplemented by molecular dynamics simulations made using a newly developed aspherical ion model. The results tie together those obtained from other experimental techniques to reveal three densification regimes. In the first, BO3 triangles are the predominant structural motifs as the pressure is increased from ambient to 6.3(5) GPa, but there is an alteration to the intermediate range order which is associated with the dissolution of boroxol rings. In the second, BO4 motifs replace BO3 triangles at pressures beyond 6.3 GPa and the dissolution of boroxol rings continues until it is completed at 11–14 GPa. In the third, the B-O coordination number continues to increase with pressure to give a predominantly tetrahedral glass, a process that is completed at a pressure in excess of 22.5 GPa. On recovery of the glass to ambient from a pressure of 8.2 GPa, triangular BO3 motifs are recovered but, relative to the uncompressed material, there is a change to the intermediate range order. The comparison between experiment and simulation shows that the aspherical ion model is able to provide results of unprecedented accuracy at pressures up to at least 10 GPa.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 3 July 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024206

©2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Anita Zeidler1, Kamil Wezka1, Dean A. J. Whittaker1, Philip S. Salmon1,*, Axelle Baroni2,3,4, Stefan Klotz2, Henry E. Fischer5, Martin C. Wilding6, Craig L. Bull7, Matthew G. Tucker7, Mathieu Salanne3, Guillaume Ferlat2,†, and Matthieu Micoulaut4

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
  • 2Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR 7590, IMPMC, F-75005 Paris, France
  • 3Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR 8234, PHENIX, F-75005 Paris, France
  • 4Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR 7600, LPTMC, F-75005 Paris, France
  • 5Institut Laue Langevin, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, Boîte Postale 156, 38042 Grenoble, France
  • 6Institute of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ, United Kindgom
  • 7ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom

  • *Corresponding author: p.s.salmon@bath.ac.uk
  • Corresponding author: Guillaume.Ferlat@impmc.upmc.fr

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 90, Iss. 2 — 1 July 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×