Crystal electron binding energy and surface work function control of tin dioxide

Keith T. Butler, John Buckeridge, C. Richard A. Catlow, and Aron Walsh
Phys. Rev. B 89, 115320 – Published 28 March 2014

Abstract

The work function of a material is commonly used as an intrinsic reference for band alignment; however, it is notoriously susceptible to extrinsic conditions. Following the classification of Bardeen we calculate values for the bulk binding energy of electrons in rutile-structured SnO2 and the effect of the surface on the work function, thus highlighting the role of the surface in determining the energy levels of a material. Furthermore we demonstrate how, through the use of ultrathin heteroepitaxial oxide layers (SiO2, TiO2, PbO2) at the surface, the work function can be tuned to achieve energy levels commensurate with important technological materials. This approach can be extended from transparent conducting oxides to other semiconducting materials.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 26 November 2013
  • Revised 13 March 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.115320

©2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Keith T. Butler1, John Buckeridge2, C. Richard A. Catlow2, and Aron Walsh1,*

  • 1Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies and Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
  • 2University College London, Kathleen Lonsdale Materials Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom

  • *a.walsh@bath.ac.uk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 89, Iss. 11 — 15 March 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×