A machine-learning approach for accurate detection of copy number variants from exome sequencing

  1. Santhosh Girirajan1,3,4
  1. 1Bioinformatics and Genomics Graduate Program of the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
  2. 2The Schreyer Honors College, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
  3. 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
  4. 4Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
  • Corresponding author: sxg47{at}psu.edu
  • Abstract

    Copy number variants (CNVs) are a major cause of several genetic disorders, making their detection an essential component of genetic analysis pipelines. Current methods for detecting CNVs from exome-sequencing data are limited by high false-positive rates and low concordance because of inherent biases of individual algorithms. To overcome these issues, calls generated by two or more algorithms are often intersected using Venn diagram approaches to identify “high-confidence” CNVs. However, this approach is inadequate, because it misses potentially true calls that do not have consensus from multiple callers. Here, we present CN-Learn, a machine-learning framework that integrates calls from multiple CNV detection algorithms and learns to accurately identify true CNVs using caller-specific and genomic features from a small subset of validated CNVs. Using CNVs predicted by four exome-based CNV callers (CANOES, CODEX, XHMM, and CLAMMS) from 503 samples, we demonstrate that CN-Learn identifies true CNVs at higher precision (∼90%) and recall (∼85%) rates while maintaining robust performance even when trained with minimal data (∼30 samples). CN-Learn recovers twice as many CNVs compared to individual callers or Venn diagram–based approaches, with features such as exome capture probe count, caller concordance, and GC content providing the most discriminatory power. In fact, ∼58% of all true CNVs recovered by CN-Learn were either singletons or calls that lacked support from at least one caller. Our study underscores the limitations of current approaches for CNV identification and provides an effective method that yields high-quality CNVs for application in clinical diagnostics.

    Footnotes

    • Received November 2, 2018.
    • Accepted June 4, 2019.

    This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server