Abstract
Changes in the corticospinal (CSE) and cortico-cortical (CCE) excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) may underlie the effect of mental fatigue on physical performance. To date, research on this subject has predominantly focused on the examination of CSE, with limited exploration of effects of mental fatigue on CCE. This study aims to investigate the influence of mental fatigue induced through prolonged cognitive activity on both CSE and CCE. Fifteen healthy adults (aged 29.13±7.15 years) participated in assessments of CSE (Motor evoked potential - MEP amplitude) and CCE (Intracortical facilitation - ICF, short-interval intracortical inhibition - SICI, and long-interval intracortical inhibition - LICI) before and after a 60-minute Stroop task (experimental condition) or watching a documentary (control condition). Subjective mental fatigue was measured using the mental fatigue visual analogue scale (M-VAS), and workload associated with the tasks was assessed using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index. Objective mental fatigue was defined by the time-related decline in Stroop task performance. The study results revealed no significant differences in M-VAS, CSE and CCE between the two conditions. Stroop task performance did not exhibit significant changes over time. However, participants perceived the Stroop task to be more mentally demanding and effortful than watching the documentary (p<0.05). Further analysis of Stroop task performance at individual participants level identified two sub-groups of participants: one exhibiting deteriorating performance with time (fatigued subgroup) and the other showing improved performance (non-fatigued subgroup). Descriptively, cortical inhibition increased (reduced SICI and ICF values) from pre to post Stroop task in the fatigued subgroup, while the non-fatigued group displayed an opposite pattern. The findings suggest that mental fatigue may lead to increased cortical inhibition, highlighting the need for further investigation with a larger sample size.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Project ID: 27394
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Etthics commitee of Monash University gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes