1887

Abstract

The deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) relationship among species of the subgenus Orla-Jensen was assessed by means of DNA/DNA hybridization experiments. High genetic homologies were found among subsp. subsp. subsp. , and subsp. ; however, there was only a low level of homology between the DNA of subsp. and the DNA of other subspecies of The DNAs of ATCC 15820 and subsp. ATCC 393 were nearly completely homologous. Although the latter strain has been proposed as the neotype for , it is not related to any of the other strains within the subspecies of and strains identified as belonging to subsp. and subsp. formed a fairly homogeneous and easily recognized group. The DNA of was unrelated to that of any known streptobacteria, and we therefore advocate the recognition of this organism as an independent species. There is a high degree of homology between and ; the name has priority, and is very probably a synonym; for the same reason, has priority over its later subjective synonym, The general DNA/DNA homology relationships among , and justify their status as separate species.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-25-2-160
1975-04-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/25/2/ijs-25-2-160.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-25-2-160&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abo-Elnaga I. G., Kandler O. 1965; ZurTaxonomie der Gattung Lactobacillus Beijerinck. I° Das Subgenus Streptobacterium Orla-Jensen. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. II 119:1–36
    [Google Scholar]
  2. American Type Culture Collection 1972; Catalogue of strains, 10th ed. American Type Culture Collection. Rockville, Md:
  3. Bergey D. H., Harrison F. C., Breed R. S., Hammer B. W., Huntoon F. M. 1923; Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 1st ed. The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner D. J. 1973; Deoxyribonucleic acid reassociation in the taxonomy of enteric bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 23:298–307
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carr J. G., Davies P. A. 1970; Homofermentative lactobacilli of ciders including Lactobacillus mali nov. spec. J. Appl. Bacteriol 33:768–774
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dellaglio F., Bottazzi V., Trovatelli L. D. 1973; Deoxyribonucleic acid homology and base composition in some thermophilic lactobacilli. J. Gen. Microbiol 74:289–297
    [Google Scholar]
  7. de Man J. G., Rogosa M., Sharpe M. E. 1960; A medium used for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol 23:130–135
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eschenbecher F. 1968; Beer-spoilage lactobacilli. Brau- wissenschaft 21:424–437
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fred E. B., Peterson W. H., Anderson J. A. 1921; The characteristics of certain pentose destroying bacteria, especially as concerns their action on arabinose. J. Biol. Chem 48:385–412
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hadley F. P., Bunting R. W., Delves E. A. 1930; Recognition of Bacillus acidophilus associated with dental caries: a preliminary report. J. Am. Dent. Ass 17:2041
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hansen P. A. 1968; Type strains of Lactobacillus species A report by the Taxonomic Subcommittee on Lactobacilli and Closely Related Organisms. American Type Culture Collection; Rockville, Md:
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hansen P. A., Lessel E. F. 1971; Lactobacillus casei (Orla-Jensen) comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 21:69–71
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrison A. P., , Jr., and Hansen P. A. 1950; A motile Lactobacillus from the cecal feces of turkeys. J. Bacteriol 59:444–446
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson J. L. 1973; Use of nucleic acid homologies in the taxonomy of anaerobic bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 23:308–315
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Katagiri H., Kitahara K., Fukami K. 1934; The characteristics of the lactic acid bacteria isolated from moto, yeast mashes for sake manufacture. IV. Classification of the lactic acid bacteria. Bull. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn 10:156–157
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kitahara K. 1940; Studies on the lactic acid bacteria isolated from mashes of various kinds of cereals. Bull. Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn 16:123
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kitahara K., Kaneko T., Goto O. 1957; Taxonomic studies on the hiochi-bacteria specific saprophytes of sake. II. Identification and classification of hioc hi-bacteria. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol 3:111–120
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kitahara K., Suzuki J. 1963; Sporolactobacillus nov. subgen. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol 9:59–71
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuznetsov V. D. 1959; A new species of lactic acid bacteria. Mikrobiologiya 28:248–251
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Langston C. W., Bouma C. 1960; A study of the microorganisms from grass silage. II. The lactobacilli. Appl. Microbiol 8:223–234
    [Google Scholar]
  21. III Miller A., Sandine W. E., Elliker P. R. 1971; Deoxyribonucleic acid homology in the genus Lactobacillus. Can. J. Microbiol 17:625–630
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mills C. K., Lessel E. F. 1973; Lactobacterium zeae Kuznetsov, a later subjective synonym of Lactobacillus casei (Orla-Jensen) Hansen and Lessel. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 23:430–432
    [Google Scholar]
  23. National Collection of Industrial Bacteria 1964; Cata logue of strains, 2nd ed. National Collection of Industrial Bacteria; Aberdeen, Scotland:
  24. Nonomura H., Yamazaki T., Ohara Y. 1965; Die Appelsflure-MilchsHure-Bakterien, welche aus ja- panischen Weinen isoliert wurden. Mitt. Kloster- neuburg 15A:241–254
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Orla-Jensen S. 1919; The lactic acid bacteria. Andr. Fed Host & Son, Copenhagen
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Orland F. I. 1950; A correlation of antigenic characteris tics among certain bacteria of Lactobacillus group. J. Infect. Dis 86:63–80
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Prescot S. C., Dunn C. G. 1959; Industrial microbi ology. p 676 McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc; New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rogosa M., Wiseman R. F., Mitchell J. A., Disraely M. N., Beaman A. J. 1953; Species differentiation of oral lactobacilli from man including description of Lactobacillus salivarius nov. sp. and Lactobacillus cellobiosus nov. sp. J. Bacteriol 65:681–699
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Reuter G. 1970; Laktobazillen und eng verwandte Mik- roorganismen in Fleisch und Fleischerzeugnissen 2. Mitt.: Die Charakterisierung der isolierten Laktobazil- lenstamme. Fleischwirtschaft 50:954–962
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharpe M. E. 1955; A serological classification of lacto bacilli. J. Gen. Microbiol 12:107–122
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sharpe M. E., Wheater D. M. 1957; Lactobacillus helveticus. J. Gen. Microbiol 16:676–679
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tilden E. B., Svec M. 1952; Further studies on a differential culture technique for estimation of acido genic bacteria in saliva. II. Species of lactobacilli isolated from saliva and their distribution in a group of children. J. Dent. Res 31:831–838
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-25-2-160
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-25-2-160
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error