735. Malaria Chemoprophylaxis Adherence Among U.S. Active Duty Service Members during Deployment to Endemic Regions

Abstract Background Military members frequently deploy to malaria-endemic regions. Most cases of travel-related malaria occur due to prophylaxis non-adherence, impacting mission readiness. Factors assessing adherence are described in outbreak settings; we prospectively assess adherence in military travelers. Methods TravMil is a prospective, observational cohort study of US military beneficiaries traveling outside the US (2010-2019). Our analysis includes only active-duty service members traveling with a military purpose to malaria-endemic regions, who were prescribed malaria prophylaxis, and who completed a pre- and post-deployment survey; they could also enroll after return from deployment. All travelers received pre-travel counseling. Survey responses were assessed using descriptive statistics and multivariate regression to determine risk factors for adherence. Results 1504 travelers were included (85% male; median age 28 years; 73% white). Median duration of travel was 77 days (12% traveled ≤ 14 days). Africa was the most common destination (33%). Primary prophylaxis included doxycycline (54%) and atovaquone/proguanil (43%). 969 (64%) were fully adherent to their regimen. The frequency of prophylaxis did not match expected values, as 3.6% of subjects reported taking prophylaxis weekly, and 2.9% did not know how often they took it. 103 (6.9%) did not take any of the prescribed regimen. On multivariate analysis, deployers were more likely to adhere if they traveled for ≤ 14 days or to Africa or practiced other mosquito-avoidance behaviors. Study enrollment post-deployment was associated with decreased odds of adherence, as was use of a tent. The use of daily versus weekly prophylaxis was not associated with a difference in adherence, though we had limited subjects prescribed weekly regimens. Figure 1. Reasons for not taking any of the prescribed chemoprophylaxis (n = 103) Table 1. Odds of full adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis on multivariate logistic analysis Conclusion Short-duration travel, travel to highly endemic regions, and mosquito-avoidance behaviors were associated with increased adherence to prophylaxis. The lower rate of adherence in post-deployment enrollees may be a surrogate for inadequate counseling or recall bias. Our study highlights potential holes in counseling regarding malaria prophylaxis and the importance of ongoing provider and patient education on malaria. Disclosures Heather Yun, MD, American Board of Internal Medicine (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Board Member

Background. Babesiosis has gained attention as an emerging protozoal zoonotic disease with an expanding known incidence and geographical range in the US. The infection is caused by Babesia microti in the US and is transmitted by the bite of Ixodes ticks, and occasionally by blood transfusion. The diagnosis is usually established by microscopic examination of a stained blood smear to see intraerythrocytic organisms. The level of parasitemia is only loosely correlated with clinical severity. Anecdotal reports suggest that HDL cholesterol levels decline during acute babesiosis. In this study, we report cholesterol levels in a series of patients with acute babesiosis with the hypothesis that HDL levels may be a potential biomarker for more severe infections.
Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed at Stony Brook University Hospital and Stony Brook Southampton Hospital between 2013 and 2018. Inclusion criteria was defined as a case of acute Babesia infection proven by peripheral blood smear microscopy and who had a lipid profile drawn during presentation to the emergency department. Cholesterol levels that were measured either before or after the infection (at least 1 month apart) were also recorded to compare to the levels reported during acute infection.
Results. A total of 40 patients (27.5% female) met criteria for acute Babesia infection. Fifteen (37.5%) had a history of splenectomy. The patients were divided into two groups for comparisons based on the treating physician's clinical decision: 32 patients who were admitted to the hospital and 8 patients who were not-admitted. History of hypertension was more common in admitted than non-admitted patients (37% vs. 17%, Chi-square test p=0.02); the median levels of LDL and HDL were more reduced in admitted than non-admitted patients (46 vs 76 mg/dL, p=0.04 and 9 vs 28.5 mg/dL, p=0.03, based on t-test respectively) Conclusion. LDL and HDL levels are significantly reduced in acute babesiosis, and LDL levels are inversely proportional to the parasitemia, suggesting that low levels of LDL may predict worsening disease in babesiosis. The mechanism of this phenomenon is unknown. Further prospective studies are needed.
Disclosures. Background. Military members frequently deploy to malaria-endemic regions. Most cases of travel-related malaria occur due to prophylaxis non-adherence, impacting mission readiness. Factors assessing adherence are described in outbreak settings; we prospectively assess adherence in military travelers.
Methods. TravMil is a prospective, observational cohort study of US military beneficiaries traveling outside the US (2010-2019). Our analysis includes only active-duty service members traveling with a military purpose to malaria-endemic regions, who were prescribed malaria prophylaxis, and who completed a pre-and post-deployment survey; they could also enroll after return from deployment. All travelers received pre-travel counseling. Survey responses were assessed using descriptive statistics and multivariate regression to determine risk factors for adherence.
Results. 1504 travelers were included (85% male; median age 28 years; 73% white). Median duration of travel was 77 days (12% traveled ≤ 14 days). Africa was the most common destination (33%). Primary prophylaxis included doxycycline (54%) and atovaquone/proguanil (43%). 969 (64%) were fully adherent to their regimen. The frequency of prophylaxis did not match expected values, as 3.6% of subjects reported taking prophylaxis weekly, and 2.9% did not know how often they took it. 103 (6.9%) did not take any of the prescribed regimen. On multivariate analysis, deployers were more likely to adhere if they traveled for ≤ 14 days or to Africa or practiced other mosquito-avoidance behaviors. Study enrollment post-deployment was associated with decreased odds of adherence, as was use of a tent. The use of daily versus weekly prophylaxis was not associated with a difference in adherence, though we had limited subjects prescribed weekly regimens. S466 • OFID 2021:8 (Suppl 1) • Abstracts  Table 1. Odds of full adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis on multivariate logistic analysis Conclusion. Short-duration travel, travel to highly endemic regions, and mosquito-avoidance behaviors were associated with increased adherence to prophylaxis. The lower rate of adherence in post-deployment enrollees may be a surrogate for inadequate counseling or recall bias. Our study highlights potential holes in counseling regarding malaria prophylaxis and the importance of ongoing provider and patient education on malaria.
Disclosures. Heather Yun, MD, American Board of Internal Medicine (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Board Member Background. The prompt recognition and treatment of Plasmodium falciparum is necessary to prevent death. We reviewed data from a cohort of patients presenting with malaria to Kings College Hospital NHS Trust, London.

Delays in Malaria Recognition and Door to Anti-malarial Time in a South
Methods. Retrospective review of electronic records and drug charts of patients diagnosed with malaria from Jan 2019-March 2021.
Results. 109 cases of malaria were identified representing travellers from 11 Sub-Saharan African countries: Nigeria(38%), Sierra Leone(33%), Ivory Coast(10%). The age range varied from 4 to 76 years with a mean of 44, 66% of the cohort was male. 22 cases occurred during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The commonest symptoms were Fever (97%), Headache (92%) and malaise (72%). P. falciparum was present in 99% cases. A travel history was taken in 94% of cases. Malaria was considered by the first clinician in 82% of cases with the second highest differential being a viral illness. In 6 cases, it took 4 to 11 medical reviews before malaria was considered. 29 patients met the UK criteria for severe malaria. Door to antimalarial time varied from 1 to 128 hours, with a median of 7.4 hours. 46% of the cohort received intravenous Artesunate as their first antimalarial. Extreme delays occurred were clinicians did not consider malaria, patients had negative films or a patient did not declare a travel history when asked. 1 patient died of cerebral malaria with a door to needle time of 2hr 3min. Where a reason for delay is documented, drug availability represented the highest cause with mean delay from prescribing antimalarial to giving antimalarial of 2.7 hours. There was no difference in door to antimalarial administration during the COVID-19 Pandemic, but patients did have a delay in presentation to hospital from onset of symptoms, mean 6.2 days pre-pandemic, 10.5 days during pandemic, this was not statistically significant (P= 0.198). 3 patients presenting during the Pandemic had covid-19 swabs prior to admission and 10 had attended primary care services. Number of days between onset of malaria symptoms and presentation to the Emergency Department Box plot demonstrating that patients were waiting longer post symptom onset to access care in the Emergency Department. 3 patients had covid swabs in the community and 10 accessed care through their primary care physician.
Conclusion. Our data show that malaria is being considered early in the emergency department however there remain significant delays in administration of treatment. In 6 cases where malaria was not considered early there were delays in diagnosis of up to 5 days. An audit cycle will be completed with the aim of reducing door to antimalarial time.
Disclosures. All Authors: No reported disclosures