528. Hospital Course of Patients Receiving Bamalanivimab: A Real World Analysis

Abstract Background Monoclonal antibodies for the outpatient treatment of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) first received emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration in November 2020. These antibodies have been associated with a reduction in emergency department visits and hospitalization through randomized controlled trials. However, modest data is available to describe the outcomes of patients who were hospitalized despite treatment. This study describes real-world outcomes concerning the treatment of COVID-19 with the first approved monoclonal antibody for COVID-19, bamlanivimab, as well as hospital courses associated with patients admitting after receiving the therapy. Methods This single-center, retrospective study evaluated real-world data of patients treated with bamlanivimab. The primary endpoint was a composite of emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalization due to worsening COVID-19. Data was analyzed from November 23, 2020 to March 5, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include reported symptoms 24-hours post-infusion and time to symptom resolution in days. Additionally, clinical course of patients hospitalized were analyzed and include average oxygen requirements, median length of stay, and mortality. A subgroup analysis was conducted between patients less than sixty-five years of age and those sixty-five and older. Results 619 patients received bamlanivimab during the specified timeframe. The primary endpoint occurred in 34 patients; 11 ED visits and 23 hospitalizations. Baseline characteristics of the patients hospitalized include median age 69 years (IQR 55, 74), 56.5% male, and 82.6% Caucasian. The most common risk factors for severe disease among those hospitalized were age ≥ 65 years and history of diabetes. The clinical course of hospitalized patients varied but 52.9% required nasal cannula for respiratory support and the average length of stay was 4.5 + 4.5 days. Other COVID-19 therapies included dexamethasone in 76.5% of patients and remdesivir in 47.1% of patients. There were no major differences in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion Bamlanivimab appears to attenuate the clinical course of COVID-19 in patients who are hospitalized despite treatment. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Session: P-24. COVID-19 Treatment
Background. Monoclonal Antibody Therapy (MAbs) has been shown to reduce rates of ED visits and hospitalizations in patients at risk for severe Covid-19 infection in clinical trials. Since November, three Mabs received emergency use authorization: Bamlanivimab (Bam), Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab (Bam/Ete) and Casirivimab/ Imdevimab (Casi/imdevi). We describe here the real-world effectiveness of implementing early MAb therapy in the outpatient setting for individuals with Covid-19 at high risk of progression.
Methods. We examined the records of 808 UCLA Health patients with a confirmed positive SARS-CoV2 PCR test who were either referred for outpatient Mab therapy or received Mab treatment in the emergency department (ED) between December 10, 2020, and May 3, 2021. The primary outcome of our analysis was the combined 30-day incidence of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or death following the date of referral. SARS-CoV2 isolates of hospitalized patients who had received Mabs were sequenced to determine the presence of variants.
Results. Of 808 patients, 383 were referred for treatment but did not receive treatment, 109 received Mabs in the ED and 316 patients were treated in an outpatient setting. Composite 30-day mortality, ED visits and hospital admissions were significantly reduced in the combination therapy group (Bam/Ete or Cas/Imd) compared with monotherapy (Bam alone) or no treatment groups (aHR 0.16, 95% CI .038, .67). Significant factors associated with the composite outcome included: history of lung disease (HR 4.46, 95% CI 2.89-6.90), cardiovascular disease (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.12-3.12), kidney disease (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.27-3.25), and immunocompromised state (HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.02-10.26) as well as high social vulnerability index (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.13-3.10). Over one-third of hospitalized patients who had received Mabs were confirmed to have the California variant (B.1.427/29) (Figure 1). Background. Remdesivir (RDV) was approved by FDA in October 2020 for use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We examined the association between RDV treatment and ICU admission in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring supplemental oxygen (but not advanced respiratory support) in MN.
Methods. COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET) is population-based surveillance of hospitalized laboratory confirmed cases of COVID-19. We analyzed COVID-NET cases ≥18 years hospitalized between Mar 23, 2020 and Jan 23, 2021 in MN for which medical record reviews were complete. On admission, included cases had evidence of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest imaging with oxygen saturation < 94% on room air or requiring supplemental oxygen. Cases were excluded if treated with RDV after ICU admission. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association between RDV treatment and ICU admission.
Conclusion. We found RDV treatment associated with a significantly lower risk of ICU admission in patients admitted to hospital requiring supplemental oxygen, suggesting that treatment may prevent disease progression in this group. Further studies should assess the potential benefit of RDV combination treatment with dexamethasone.
Disclosures. Ruth Lynfield, MD, Nothing to disclose Background. Monoclonal antibodies for the outpatient treatment of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) first received emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration in November 2020. These antibodies have been associated with a reduction in emergency department visits and hospitalization through randomized controlled trials. However, modest data is available to describe the outcomes of patients who were hospitalized despite treatment. This study describes real-world outcomes concerning the treatment of COVID-19 with the first approved monoclonal antibody for COVID-19, bamlanivimab, as well as hospital courses associated with patients admitting after receiving the therapy.

Hospital Course of Patients
Methods. This single-center, retrospective study evaluated real-world data of patients treated with bamlanivimab. The primary endpoint was a composite of emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalization due to worsening COVID-19. Data was analyzed from November 23, 2020 to March 5, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include reported symptoms 24-hours post-infusion and time to symptom resolution in days. Additionally, clinical course of patients hospitalized were analyzed and include average oxygen requirements, median length of stay, and mortality. A subgroup analysis was conducted between patients less than sixty-five years of age and those sixty-five and older.
Results. 619 patients received bamlanivimab during the specified timeframe. The primary endpoint occurred in 34 patients; 11 ED visits and 23 hospitalizations. Baseline characteristics of the patients hospitalized include median age 69 years (IQR 55, 74), 56.5% male, and 82.6% Caucasian. The most common risk factors for severe disease among those hospitalized were age ≥ 65 years and history of diabetes. The clinical course of hospitalized patients varied but 52.9% required nasal cannula for respiratory support and the average length of stay was 4.5 + 4.5 days. Other COVID-19 therapies included dexamethasone in 76.5% of patients and remdesivir in 47.1% of patients. There were no major differences in the subgroup analysis.
Conclusion. Bamlanivimab appears to attenuate the clinical course of COVID-19 in patients who are hospitalized despite treatment.
Disclosures. All Authors: No reported disclosures

Session: P-24. COVID-19 Treatment
Background. There is a continued and pressing need for safe and effective treatment of COVID-19. Significant survival benefits have been shown by dexamethasone, tocilizumab and sarilumab, however they are only recommended in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Ivermectin is a well-established and readily available antiparasitic drug which may be suitable for treatment in mild and moderate disease stages. It recently demonstrated anti-viral properties in vitro and now over 80 clinical trials have been registered worldwide to test its effectiveness in COVID-19 patients. This meta-analysis aims to collect data on adverse events reported in new COVID-19 treatment trials for the use of ivermectin as a repurposed medication.
Methods. Data was extracted from randomised trials of COVID-19 treatment trials identified through systematic searches of PUBMED, EMBASE, MedRxiv and trial registries. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis is the frequency of adverse events. Key safety events included serious, gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular and dermatological adverse events.
Results. Overall, 18 trials investigating ivermectin for COVID-19 in a total of 2496 participants reported safety data and were included. There was no significant difference in the proportion of all adverse events between ivermectin and the comparator. There were 371/1261 (29%) adverse events recorded in the ivermectin containing arms and 376/1284 (29%) in the control arms (RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.77 -1.34]; p = 0.91). There was no significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events across treatment arms (RR 1.95 [95% CI 0.75 -5.11]; p = 0.18). No significant differences between ivermectin and the control were seen across different subcategories of adverse events. Figure 1 shows a summary of the results for all adverse events.
Forest plot comparing ivermectin and the control for all adverse events in COVID-19 trials, subdivided into single-day dosing trials and multi-day dosing trials.
Conclusion. The results of recent COVID-19 trials show that overall, ivermectin is safe and well-tolerated. No significant difference in adverse event reporting was found across all subgroups in single and multi-day treatment regimens for the studies analysed. Safety reporting methodologies often varied across trials. Future and ongoing trials should be encouraged to collect and monitor safety data systematically.
Disclosures. All Authors: No reported disclosures