101. Impact of an Integrated Tele-Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at a Rural Community Hospital

Abstract Background Small hospitals in the US may lack access to infectious diseases (ID) expertise despite similar rates of antimicrobial use and drug-resistant bacteria as larger hospitals. A tele-antimicrobial stewardship program (TASP) is a force multiplier, expanding access to specialty care, training, and guidance on appropriate resource utilization. Data on the impact of TASPs in community or rural inpatient settings is limited. Methods We established a TASP at a 160-bed hospital in Armstrong County, PA (population < 5000) in September 2020. Tele-ID consult services were already being used (Figure 1). A non-local ID pharmacist or ID physician performed prospective audits and provided feedback with 1 local pharmacist on a 30-minute video conference call daily. At TASP implementation, all patients receiving intravenous (IV) fluoroquinolones, metronidazole, and azithromycin were reviewed. Figure 1 shows the additional support following TASP implementation, including addition of ceftriaxone, carbapenems, IV vancomycin, and tocilizumab to daily reviews. A patient monitoring form was developed to track interventions and the local pharmacists were trained in documentation. Table 1 lists other TASP features implemented. Figure 1. TASP Timeline Table 1. TASP Accomplishments Results From 09/01/2020 to 04/30/2021, 304 stewardship opportunities were identified and 77% of interventions were accepted. Recommending a duration of therapy was accepted most frequently (93.5%) and de-escalation of therapy least frequently (69.6%) (Table 2). Recommending an ID consultation or diagnostic testing was always accepted but only comprised 6.2% of all interventions. Daily calls involved an average of 5 patient reviews. Monthly antimicrobial use declined on average from 673 DOT (days of therapy)/1000 PD (patient days) to 638 DOT/1000 PD (Figure 2). Daily calls were cancelled on 31/166 weekdays (18.7%) due to staffing shortages. Table 2. TASP Interventions (9/2020 - 4/2021) Figure 2. Monthly Antimicrobial Use in Days of Therapy (DOT) per 1000 Patient Days (4/2019 - 5/2021) Conclusion Implementation of TASP in a community hospital resulted in a high percentage of accepted stewardship interventions and lower antimicrobial usage. Success is dependent on robust educational efforts, establishing strong relationships with local providers, and involvement of key stakeholders. Lack of dedicated stewardship time for local pharmacists is a very significant barrier. Disclosures Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AbbVie (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant)Entasis (Consultant)Ferring (Consultant)Infectious Disease Connect, Inc (Other Financial or Material Support, Director of Stewardship Innovation)Merck (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)Summit (Consultant) Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AbbVie (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Cidara (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Entasis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Ferring (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Infectious Disease Connect, Inc (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Director of Stewardship Innovation, Other Financial or Material Support; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Shionogi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Summit (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Tina Khadem, PharmD, Infectious Disease Connect, Inc. (Employee) Nancy Zimmerman, RN, BSN, I’d connect (Employee) John Mellors, MD, Abound Bio, Inc. (Shareholder)Accelevir (Consultant)Co-Crystal Pharma, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, Share Options)Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support)Infectious DIseases Connect (Other Financial or Material Support, Share Options)Janssen (Consultant)Merck (Consultant) Rima Abdel-Massih, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Employee, Director of Clinical Operations) Rima Abdel-Massih, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Chief Medical Officer, Other Financial or Material Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Shareholder J Ryan. Bariola, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Other Financial or Material Support, salary support)


Assessment of Emergency Department Prescribing Practices for Outpatient Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection, Community-Acquired Pneumonia, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections
Matthew Thaller, PharmD 1 ; Casey J. Dempsey, PharmD BCIDP 2 ; Alexander Levine, PharmD, BCPS 1 ; Kelly Shepard, PharmD 1 ; 1 The Hospital of Central Connecticut, South Windsor, Connecticut; 2 Hartford HealthCare, Bolton, Connecticut Session: P-06. Antimicrobial Stewardship: Non-Inpatient Settings Background. Studies have found a need for improved antimicrobial stewardship in the outpatient setting. The literature is limited by the populations and disease states studied as many focus on viral infections. This study focuses on the adult emergency departments (EDs) in a large healthcare system and quantifies the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions deemed inappropriate for common outpatient infections.
Methods. A retrospective study was conducted in patients with selected common infections treated as an outpatient from the ED. Patients were reviewed for eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria in Table 1. Appropriateness was analyzed based on: need for antimicrobial therapy; agent choice, dose, duration, and directions in concordance with national guidelines and local resistance patterns; and no clinically relevant drug interactions, unnecessary dual coverage, or a better or safer alternative available. The entire prescription was marked inappropriate if any factor was deemed inappropriate.

Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Based on the Epic report generated, a random sample of patients were selected for manual review. Only patients who met the following criteria were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis.
Results. Of the 318 patients reviewed, 274 were included. Treatment was deemed inappropriate 64% (174/274) of the time, significantly above the estimated 30% (p < 0.001). The agent selection, duration, and dose were the most the frequent factors deeming a prescription inappropriate. The most inappropriately used agents were fluoroquinolones and azithromycin. A positive culture required modification of therapy 31% (22/70) of the time and more so when the drug was guideline recommended. For example, when empiric antibiotic selection was per urinary tract infection guidelines, 31% (14/53) required modification compared to 19% (3/16) when the agent was not. This was most apparent when cephalexin was used.
Conclusion. The use of antibiotics at the studied EDs was not in concordance with guidelines in the study period. However, the cultures were sensitive less often to agents deemed appropriate per guidelines for empiric therapy. It is possible that the ideal treatments of bacterial infections in this community are not representative of national resistance patterns. Using ED-specific antibiograms to create order panels for common infections, as well as prospective pharmacist review at ED discharge, could increase appropriate utilization of preferred agents.
Disclosures. All Authors: No reported disclosures Results. From 09/01/2020 to 04/30/2021, 304 stewardship opportunities were identified and 77% of interventions were accepted. Recommending a duration of therapy was accepted most frequently (93.5%) and de-escalation of therapy least frequently (69.6%) ( Table 2). Recommending an ID consultation or diagnostic testing was always accepted but only comprised 6.2% of all interventions. Daily calls involved an average of 5 patient reviews. Monthly antimicrobial use declined on average from 673 DOT (days of therapy)/1000 PD (patient days) to 638 DOT/1000 PD (Figure 2). Daily calls were cancelled on 31/166 weekdays (18.7%) due to staffing shortages. Table 2. TASP Interventions (9/2020 -4/2021)